Reply With Quote
No proof of rape
still applies:
No proof of rape
good thing it wasn't aimed at your head. you didn't duck
This is the problem with politics these days, tbh, we went from rapist to self-admitted 30 year old incel SAWM... what's even more sad it's the former is probably more believable than the later...
I'm actually way more concerned about the nomination now if this guy truly went to college and didn't get any pussy until he was 30+...
where's the middle ground these days? where did all the guys that "touched some boobies in high school and smoked some pot in college" go? It's either saint or the devil? really?
consent is the arbiter
try laughing one of these days, boutons... it's good for you
Senate Democrats Investigate a New Allegation of Sexual Misconduct, from Brett Kavanaugh’s College Years
The claim dates to the 1983-84 academic school year, when Kavanaugh was a freshman at Yale University.
The offices of at least four Democratic senators have received information about the allegation,
and at least two have begun investigating it.
(Ramirez identified the two male onlookers, but, at her request, The New Yorker is not naming them.)
A third male student then exposed himself to her. “I remember a penis being in front of my face,” she said.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-...eborah-ramirez
New Yorker reporters fact-check Brett Kavanaugh’s ‘false’ Fox News interview about sexual assault allegations
Kavanaugh said of the incident, which he denies, “If such a thing had happened, it would have been the talk of the campus.”
at least one witness suggests that the event was talked about on campus in the days afterward.
“And so it was – a classmate who heard about it at the time told me he has thought of it every time he’s heard Kavanaugh’s name – for the last 35 years!” said Mayer.
“Worth considering [regarding] Kavanaugh’s assertion that all men & women he knew in college consider this ‘inconceivable’: his roommate at the time is on the record saying Ramirez’s claim is credible and consistent with Kavanaugh’s behavior he witnessed,”
The interviewer did, in fact, note that Kavanaugh’s roommate found Ramirez’s allegations credible with. Kavanaugh had no explanation for why his roommate would say this.
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/new...e+Raw+Story%29
! There's more evidence about K's sexual shenanagans, even rape,
than there was, after EIGHT ING REPUG COMMITTEES and $10M, (what)about "Ben Ghazi!"
"Her Emails!"
"Uranium One"
But Repugs want NO investigation, no "advise and consent" of K by FBI or Senators, let's hurry and vote before MORE K truth(s) are discovered, confirmed.
Lol "both sides". Shut the up.
It’s difficult to believe red team would think blue team would play nice after Mitch McConnel’s Obama proclaimation and Garland.
I think Dems playing this wrong. If all it takes is an FBI investigation to nail this guy to the wall, then go ahead and let him confirmed. He's guilty, right? If you beat him now, Trump just puts another conservative judge up there. IF you put K on the bench, you need only wait a couple of years, get your own president up there - THEN do your FBI investigation. He's guilty, so impeach him - AND replace him with a solid liberal justice. FOR LIFE!
Yeah - this is what stuck out to me too. Prime Yale/Harvard pussy and this guy had to resort to sexual assault?
lol
Kavanaugh did not allow his wife to answer the question asked to her directly (on Faux news) - if she supported an FBI investigation to clear her husbands name- Kavanaugh interrupted and repeated his "fair process" mantra and then said he would do what the Senate recommended.
In other words - FBI investigation "over my dead body"
Why are they terrified of an FBI investigation - while the accusers are asking for an FBI investigation?
Interesting, but too long of a shot.
Too much can go wrong
I don't think the Dems will have 2/3 of the Senate for many years need to convict an impeached judge.
I posted an article that suggested why the Repugs are sticking with this asshole when they could withdraw him and replace with a baggage-less asshole.
Federalist Soc has many hard right extremist activists ready to go.
Republican Party Declares Moral Bankruptcy
WASHINGTON —The Republican Party officially filed for moral bankruptcy on Tuesday morning,
a move that many in the nation considered long overdue.
In filing for moral bankruptcy,
the Republicans will formally attest that they have no morals, standards, or ethics on their balance sheet, and
will agree to cease all activity as a political party in exchange for indemnity from any and all legal actions.
Harland Dorrinson, a Washington attorney who specializes in moral bankruptcies, said that, by making its moral vacuum official,
the G.O.P. could theoretically break itself up and sell off the parts, but, he warned, “There are no buyers.”
“From Lindsey Graham to Ted Cruz to Mitch McConnell to Chuck Grassley,
all of the Republican Party’s assets could only be described as toxic,” he said.
“Their breakup value is zero.”
Further complicating such a sale, Dorrinson said, is the fact that
the lion’s share of the Republican Party is already owned by the National Rifle Association, Koch Industries, and the Russian government.
“All of those en ies are going to take a major loss on their investment,” he warned.
“The Kochs have been trying to sell Paul Ryan for months, and they can’t give him away.”
While bemoaning the demise of a once legitimate political party, Dorrinson did see one silver lining.
“The bankruptcy of the Republican Party will be presided over by Donald Trump, and no one has more experience in this area,”
he said.
https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/republican-party-declares-moral-bankruptcy
LOL hilarious satire by the king of satire! Just nonstop laughs! He's saying what we're all thinking, and that's what makes it so funny.
Republican Party Declares Moral Bankruptcy
WASHINGTON —The Republican Party officially filed for moral bankruptcy on Tuesday morning,
a move that many in the nation considered long overdue.
In filing for moral bankruptcy,
the Republicans will formally attest that they have no morals, standards, or ethics on their balance sheet, and
will agree to cease all activity as a political party in exchange for indemnity from any and all legal actions.
Harland Dorrinson, a Washington attorney who specializes in moral bankruptcies, said that, by making its moral vacuum official,
the G.O.P. could theoretically break itself up and sell off the parts, but, he warned, “There are no buyers.”
“From Lindsey Graham to Ted Cruz to Mitch McConnell to Chuck Grassley,
all of the Republican Party’s assets could only be described as toxic,” he said.
“Their breakup value is zero.”
Further complicating such a sale, Dorrinson said, is the fact that
the lion’s share of the Republican Party is already owned by the National Rifle Association, Koch Industries, and the Russian government.
“All of those en ies are going to take a major loss on their investment,” he warned.
“The Kochs have been trying to sell Paul Ryan for months, and they can’t give him away.”
While bemoaning the demise of a once legitimate political party, Dorrinson did see one silver lining.
“The bankruptcy of the Republican Party will be presided over by Donald Trump, and no one has more experience in this area,”
he said.
https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/republican-party-declares-moral-bankruptcy
Another one of those, "this would almost be funny- if it weren't so goddamn true" - smh.
It would have been really stupid of him to claim he was a virgin if he wasn't.
He should’ve nominated Diane Sykes and been done with it. I couldn’t see Dems going dirty on a female candidate.
You need to be woke, son.
that bastion of integrity the FBI.
Christian supremacists DROOLING over 5 hard right SCOTUS s who will overturn Roe, Obergefell, etc
Justice Brett Kavanaugh would represent an immediate threat to LGBT rights
Major anti-LGBT group is ready, with at least four cases on established rights heading for the Supreme Court
https://www.salon.com/2018/09/25/jus...o-lgbt-rights/
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
