Reply With Quote
A) Why is "gender confusion" more prevalent in the West?
B) Why is "gender confusion" becoming ever so more prevalent in the USA?
Those are the important questions we should be asking. Self reflect on what we are projecting and teaching our youth
Dr. Fabbs co-signing
A) Why is "gender confusion" more prevalent in the West?
B) Why is "gender confusion" becoming ever so more prevalent in the USA?
Those are the important questions we should be asking. Self reflect on what we are projecting and teaching our youth
"Although also unnamed, this seems to refer to Drummond et al. (2008), which followed up 25 kids assessed in childhood for gender issues: 15 of the 25 received official diagnoses for their gender dysphoria, and 10 were judged to be experiencing the feelings, but to be “subthreshold” for an official diagnosis. That is, the alleged criticism is that including “subthreshold” cases would water down the results from cases who are formally diagnosed. The irrelevance of that claim is again easily seen by looking at it directly: Of the 15 kids who received a diagnosis, two continued to be transgender in adulthood (13/15 = 87% desistance), and of the 10 without a diagnosis, one continued to be transgender (9/10 = 90% desistance)."
https://www.psypost.org/2017/12/many...ay-trans-50499
This is from my second link. This may not be accurate. Perhaps there is more relevant information or this is an outright lie. If this is true the "medical professionals" don't know and this is 100% child abuse.
Don't forget the 40% suicide rate
But islam didn't cuck you.
Yeah, I mentioned the 41% attempted suicide on the first page.Don't forget the 40% suicide rate
Do you have some numbers on how prevalent this is?
Some of you guys are so obsessed with the whole gender dysphoria and gender confusion that are missing the forest from the tree.
The related paragraph of law:
The right of minors and nonminors in foster care to health care and mental health care described in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 16001.9 includes covered gender affirming health care and gender affirming mental health care. This right is subject to existing laws governing consent to health care for minors and nonminors and does not limit, add, or otherwise affect applicable laws governing consent to health care.
There's no doubt a lot of these kids go through an extremely difficult psychological period (and their parents too). The whole suicide rate doesn't just come from becoming transgender, but from the fact that these are very troubled individuals (for whatever reason, it really doesn't matter).
They're not stupid and they're not weird, they're just going through a troubling period with their gender and sexuality. They have specific mental health issues that need to be addressed by professionals, that understand that 'gender confusion' or whatever you want to call it is a real issue.
Even for kids that 'grow out of it', they don't just breeze through it. There's peer pressure, social pressure, sometimes family pressure. It's a difficult path they travel, and having a professional that's able to help them through it is important, and California is stepping up to the table here to assist these kids.
tbh, tattooing your calves and shouting out "they're all gots" is easy, but this is difficult stuff families go through, and it's serious. It's not even new, really, in the past it was all taboo and not spoken about, and you still had suicides and everything else.
I don't think many are against them having access to a therapist to discuss their mental disorder tbh.
You're content to leave them in the custody of the state while whining about how the state treats their mental health with your tax dollars. This makes me question how much you actually care about the children.
Do any other conditions of California foster care concern you, or is it just the (maybe) couple dozen per year that may need health care related to gender iden y?
I didn't know we were talking about only State custody would-be-forced trannys.
How many trannys have you adopted?
Legit therapists yes, that minority.
Perverts with agendas, no.
That's because the op was disingenuous and you didn't read the article
That's probably because you didn't read the legislation.
I'm not accusing the state of child abuse.How many trannys have you adopted?
Do you think Bruce Jenner could have been saved with competent intervention?
You're pretty ignorant tbh
Do you wish you could be cucked by the demonic Kardashian cult and then tranny'd?
I don't have the medical authority to speak on how Ms. Jenner's life may have been different, but I do know that medical philosophies and practices aren't typically guided by a single example of a patient.
"But what about this well-known celebrity" is not usually a good argument in a discussion about broad medical practice.
lol gossipy Flabbs
That's pretty stupid.
Well I thought there was a chance you might not want to.
Never implied anything else. I had links. There was nothing disingenuous about it.
You and The Federalist sure downplayed the out of this being about foster kids.
muh taxes
You and The Federalist sure downplayed the out of this being about foster kids.
didn't even mention this legislation was geared specifically towards foster kids.
Totally not disingenuous. Totally.
That's the le. I don't think I made a single comment about taxes(could be wrong). My greatest concern has been the abuse/permanent damage of children.You and The Federalist sure downplayed the out of this being about foster kids.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions