Well you're no expert in the field so your concerns are easily discarded.
Well you're no expert in the field so your concerns are easily discarded.
It states in the first sentence of the second paragraph that it is about foster care children. I posted the first paragraph in here. Therefore all you have to do is click and read the first thing you haven't read.
Next time I'll be more clear. There was nothing disingenuous though.
I'm sure the people that voted on this were experts and not just pushing their agenda.
Then perhaps you should post the law along with some medical opinions about the impact of transgender health care for children instead of an article from the ing Federalist.
Try to do some of your own thinking.
The article has a link to the law.
Welcome to the median of the slippery slope.
Why was this particular article's tax-heavy and foster-kid-downplaying coverage of the law your preferred source for discussion of child abuse?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)