Brett Kavanaugh now under FBI investigation

[DMC]

It's not a matter of her credibility - there is no proof or evidence to back up her allegations.

There doesn't need to be because it's not a trial where preponderance of evidence is used. This is only a claim to sway votes, and Dr Ford said as much. She wasn't trying to report a crime, she was trying to stop a selection.

[baseline bum]

Shower time.
Yep. I got something on that.
Gotta listen to the rest.
Fn amazing.

I don't think it's amazing any more. It's par for the course after Trump got the presidency on conspiracy theories.

[hater]

As opposed to the ed up party that is rebuilding itself in Trump's image?

They have no choice. They rebel and get beheaded

[DMC]

Would yes definitely

Several years ago maybe, right now she's a version of Chow Yun Fat.

[hater]

Several years ago maybe, right now she's a version of Chow Yun Fat.

Age is sometimes a positive rather than a negative

[DMC]

Dude when are you going to channel your anger where it belongs, towards the ed up party that cleared the field for that who couldn't beat Donald ing Trump.

To be fair, the field was Bernie Sanders, a guy who wasn't even with the DNC until it became convenient. They really stopped looking after Obama got in.

[DMC]

Age is sometimes a positive rather than a negative

Except when it means the roast beef hangs on both sides.

[rmt]

There is no proof or evidence to back up her allegations and CHANGE THE MINDS of the few senators necessary to get to 50 confirmation votes.

[baseline bum]

There is no proof or evidence to back up her allegations and CHANGE THE MINDS of the few senators necessary to get to 50 confirmation votes.

They said they found Ford credible during rat er's entire testimony. They still support him. Therefore they don't give a .

[Reck]

If it was you, both could be correct.

Go eat a burger fattie.

[Nathan89]

I told him earlier that he was wrong.

[hater]

Except when it means the roast beef hangs on both sides.

Yes of course. Roast beef can hang at any age

[LkrFan]

Have you gotten to Lindsey Graham's tirade? He's for sure setting himself up to be Sessions' replacement after the primaries. And the Vince Foster conspiracy theorist rat er Kavanaugh with more Clinton conspiracy theories in his opening statement.

We really are a hole country with this guy soon to be on our court

[Mikeanaro]

That's in a legal proceeding.

This was a hearing to determine whether Judge Kavanaugh is a good choice for a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court. I don't know how you can watch him today and come away thinking he belongs with the 9 most important legal positions in the country unless this is just about scoreboarding.

Pick another conservative who can carry himself or herself with more dignity. This was an embarrassment, but then again, look at our President.

The embarrassment is the empty accusation with no evidence, someone could do the same to you and then you will lose your dignity in a blink, it doesnt work like that.
40 years living as a honorable person and suddenly Garth Algar comes out of nowhere claiming things that supposedly happened 36 years ago.

[Mikeanaro]

There doesn't need to be because it's not a trial where preponderance of evidence is used. This is only a claim to sway votes, and Dr Ford said as much. She wasn't trying to report a crime, she was trying to stop a selection.

Thats why its purely a poli ical move, she feared for her life but sway da votes.

[Mikeanaro]

These people need to make up their minds. They were saying he was gay. Now he grabs drunken girls by the pussy.

It doesnt matter really, if he admits he groped a girl maybe he plays for both teams, like Marlon Brando.

[Th'Pusher]

It's not a matter of her credibility - there is no proof or evidence to back up her allegations.

Do you think that Mark Judge should be interviewed by the FBI and if not, why?

[ElNono]

Only heard parts of his testimony (didn't hear Ford), and at least he looked more human, tbh, football parties, beer, etc...

[rmt]

Do you think that Mark Judge should be interviewed by the FBI and if not, why?

Didn't he give a sworn statement under penalty of perjury? that did not substantiate her allegations.

[Th'Pusher]

Didn't he give a sworn statement under penalty of perjury? that did not substantiate her allegations.

No

[Spurs Homer]

You have zero knowledge of what she may or may not have gained.

She laid on the "I'm naive" shtick a little to thick at parts of that question and answer session. She cannot recall what she did recently, yet somehow can recall all those details from 3.5 decades ago. She can't recall how she got home, nowhere in her trauma did "I cannot tell this person who just picked me up" come into play. She didn't recall giving her therapy notes to the WaPo and that was recently. She acted like she was unfamiliar with the polygraph but she's a psychology professor. I have a hard time believing she's unaware of it. She lied about her fear or anxiety about flying, stating later it was just inconvenient. She stated that her beach friends kept trying to coach her, which means she told them about it.

There's a lot here that doesn't add up. Perhaps she was attacked, but I don't believe she's sure of it. What I do believe now that I have heard her testimony (as it were) is that she had an agenda that did not include catharsis, only revenge disguised as civic duty. There's likely a host of reports dropped on the desks of politicians when these types of things happen. She's an affluent white girl who even now speaks like a high schooler, who somehow is a professor of clinical psychology.

Maybe she's telling the truth, but she was willing to destroy this man after almost 40 years of doing nothing about him, solely for a political cause. She's not innocent, not now.

Talk about zero knowledge - whew - that is exactly the amount you displayed in this post = zero.

She was 100% credible and honest. She said she either gave the WAPO - notes - or told them verbally just could not remember at this moment and it wasn't a huge issue - she admitted that she did give the content to them one method or the other.
She said she did not really look or pay attention to cameras or recording devices but just assumed she was being recorded. She is not in law enforcement or investigations or any kind of profession where she should have intimate knowledge of polygraph workings. (the machine or its hook up procedures which is what she referred to).

She did not lie about a fear of flying - she testified that she is uncomfortable or gets extreme anxiety being in an enclosed space - which probably started when your frat boy rapist trapped her in a room and covered her mouth and then put his body weight on her until she thought he might accidentally kill her. She has flown when necessary but only after weighing if her anxiety is worth bearing for 4 hours as opposed to driving across the country. Completely reasonable - just ask the millions of humans who have a fear of flying - or some kind of discomfort being trapped in a small enclosed tube for hours.

All of the above actually makes her more credible - not less. A trained liar (like Kavanaugh or Trump) would actually recite tales that they preconceived in their minds and make sure to wrap their lies neatly in a bow - because they are lying and trying to cover up their lies.
For example - the lie Kavanaugh told under oath today about that girl in the yearbook that the football team said they were "alumni" of. The one they bragged about banging - (which she called lies - but hurtful/humiliating). Kavanaugh was asked about the meaning of this and he said because they all (the football team) were just "admirers" of the girl.
A small lie - but the fact that he felt the need to defend a little lie goes a long way in explaining how he is covering up bigger issues/bigger lies.
He told another little lie regarding his yearbook and barfing - just like as in the prior example he covered this little lie - by making up a new one. Instead of manning up and saying - yeah we partied - we barfed - just like most partying young men - instead - he says he has a weak stomach and this is why he wrote that entry in his yearbook.

Perjury again. Yet here you are - slandering the victim who was 100% honest and credible - and defending the en led frat boy sexual assaulter.

It was also established by the hired-hand female prosecutor that she (Dr. Ford) actually reached out to report this assault - BEFORE - Kavanaugh was named as the actual nominee. She began reaching out and reporting her claim when Kavanaugh was just on the "short list" of nominees - blowing the right wing claim and your false claim that she is some kind of left wing operative trying to destroy a good man's name.

Are you going to say that if Kavanaugh had not been the SC pick that she was just going to change the name of her assaulter AFTER already having reported him?

[Chris]

[Spurs Homer]

Didn't he give a sworn statement under penalty of perjury? that did not substantiate her allegations.

A sworn statement on a page is no subs ute for an impartial investigator from the FBI who can ask follow up questions to his claim.

Mark Judge was hidden away by republicans because they are hiding something and they are avoiding a real impartial investigation. NEW ALLEGATIONS RESURFACED - after Kavanaugh's background investigation was already closed. This is why from the beginning there has been a rush and the hiding of hundreds of thousands of do ents.

[Reck]

Didn't he give a sworn statement under penalty of perjury? that did not substantiate her allegations.

Turns out his attorney wrote that. It's void basically.

He could lie and not be held to account because it's not his actual signature.

kind of like Trump did with the pornstar payoff.

David Dennison

[Spurs Homer]

Turns out his attorney wrote that. It's void basically.

He could lie and not be held to account because it's not his actual signature.

kind of like Trump did with the pornstar payoff.

David Dennison

lol