This is silly:
There will be no confidentiality. It's like confession to your priest. It's confidential until you confess to a knowledge of a crime.
Sexual assault IS a crime. Subpoena him already!!
Don't know if this was already mentioned - but the FBI can also look into the TWO OTHER ALLEGED VICTIMS - instead of sweeping them under the rug. If those two are just frauds - the FBI can prosecute them.
Valid point. He'll have to prove he did not participate.
She also said that him and Brett were teenage drunks. His book corroborates that claim. Hard to prove he was a drunk, but not a tape co-conspirator. His credibility would be in question.
that was great at the time. i might have even posted that here
“Wondering if there’s a good Bernie narrative for a story, which is that Bernie never ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess,” wrote DNC Deputy Communications Director Mark Paustenbach to DNC Communications Director Luis Miranda, in response to backlash over DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz shutting off the Sanders campaign’s access to voter database files.
Over the past several weeks, Guccifer 2.0 released several internal memos showing DNC staff strategizing to make Clinton the presidential nominee—as early as March 2015. In June 2016, Florida-based law firm, Beck & Lee, filed a class action lawsuit against Wasserman Schultz and the DNC based on the revelations from these leaked files.
Other emails show DNC staff in damage control over allegations from the Sanders campaign, when a report—corroborated by a Politico—revealed the DNC’s joint fundraising committee with the Clinton campaign was laundering money to the Clinton campaign instead of fundraising for down-ticket Democrats. Regardless of the fundraising tactics, because both major campaigns didn’t agree to use the joint fundraising committee super-PAC with the DNC, the DNC should have recused itself from participating with just the Clinton campaign.
https://observer.com/2016/07/wikilea...ned-democracy/
i predict that people here will call mark judge a liar.
Why Do We Tolerate Kavanaugh’s Complicity With Torture?
how did Kavanaugh’s candidacy get this far?
How did his bid last long enough to get to the point where it was imperiled by #MeToo-related personal misbehavior?
Why didn’t it founder first on the rockier shoals of his insane ideology?
As a judge the nominee was quoted saying that the NSA’s mass surveillance of every American’s emails, phone calls and texts is “entirely consistent” with the Cons ution.
As a lawyer once told me, that is not and cannot be true.
“In my view, that critical national security need outweighs the impact on privacy occasioned by this [NSA] program,” Kavanaugh wrote. It is impossible to overstate the importance of this issue. The NSA programs exposed by Edward Snowden transformed the United States from the supposed “land of the free” to an authoritarian Orwellian dystopia.
White House lawyer Kavanaugh worked on Alberto Gonzalez’s notorious “torture memos,”
the flimsy legalistic covers Bush used to justify waterboarding and murdering innocent Muslim kidnap victims at Guantánamo concentration camp and CIA dungeons around the world.
he played what Senator Chuck Schumer described as “a critical role” in Bush’s novel use of “signing statements.”
The vaunted John McCain-sponsored bill banning torture was a classic example.
Bush signed it. Then he signed a signing statement that amounted to crossing his fingers behind his back: the federal government would not enforce the law.
McCain’s bill became law but torture continues.
Kavanaugh is a fervent devotee to the weird counter-cons utional “doctrine of the unitary executive”
promoted by such fellow neocons as Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz.
“In its most extreme form,
unitary executive theory can mean that neither Congress nor the federal courts can tell the President what to do or how to do it, particularly regarding national security matters,”
Supporting torture.
Undermining Congress and the rule of law.
Contempt for habeas corpus.
Giving the president the powers of a king.
Any of these are more than enough reason to oppose Kavanaugh but Democrats ignored or barely mentioned them during judiciary committee hearings.
There were no rants, no floor speeches.
Liberal protesters did not gather to condemn Kavanaugh on torture.
Liberal groups did not air ads about it.
Those messages to the world are toxic and dangerous. Our national moral high ground has been further eroded because Democrats took the easy path to non-confirmation.
https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/09...-with-torture/
you're so ing dense
The irony of you whiffing and calling me dense after you totally miss a blatant joke
Absolutely. Avennati vetted one of them. If they go thru with the FBI investigation, Kavanagh = f
Yea please lets bring him Avenati and his “victim” out in the open
that will really help
kudosThe irony of you whiffing and calling me dense after you totally miss a blatant joke
Too lateYea please lets bring him Avenati and his “victim” out in the open
that will really help
I'm not so sure. Trump stole the electoral votes. If the Ds flip the house this Nov as expected, laws will be put be put in place to prevent Russian interference.
GOP let it happen. Dems won't. Only reason Trump "won" this election is thru cheating.
You people have lost your minds
How so?You people have lost your minds
but seriously, luferians good now
kavanaugh plays devil games. luciferian alter confirmed
I know right? SMH
squishy GOP yes votes are seeking political cover from the FBI; no matter which way they go, for Kavanaugh or against, they can point at that.
You of ALL ing people typing something so trite and hypocritical.
It'll be interesting to hear what people say next when the FBI report comes back with the same stuff that has already common knowledge.
Never claimed to beat an opponent at internet nigaYou of ALL ing people typing something so trite and hypocritical.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
