Reply With Quote
YOU CALLED IT
YOU CALLED IT
Kavanaugh's prepared statement could have been the opening for an episode of Hannity, minus the crying.
Go piss on an underage girl, you .
“I’ve ordered the FBI to conduct a supplemental investigation to update Judge Kavanaugh’s file. As the Senate has requested, this update must be limited in scope and completed in less than one week.”
so limited as to be a useless nothing but pro forma bull
Trash thinks we are all as credulous, as dumb as his base
Why aren't the Dems going after dumb , bag K for his political work for Starr, for lying about Miranda stolen info, for supporting Repug torture and extraordinary rendition?
Let me guess...yawn..
Double win for my Djohn.
No, I'm not a Republican hack. You are a democrat hack. I'm not nearly as fanatical about this as you are. But if a man is accused of gang rape and other crimes, and doesn't come out pissed, then it shows me that he doesn't think he's innocent. He had to come out with fire and emotion and he did.
You are naive if you think that anyone that has any influence by the Clintons doesn't enjoy all this character assassination. Like I said, that's not the main reason all this came out. It came out because this is the most hotly contested seat in the history of the Supreme Court for many reasons.
You want an embarrassment that undermines faith in the objectivity of the court? Think about how poorly the democrats have handled the entire Ford matter. They could have had it investigated in the background without making it public. They could have addressed it with Kavanaugh in July and August when he was meeting people. They could have had an FBI investigation in July or August. They could have honored Ford's wishes to not have her name go public by doing a private investigation in July or August. I would wager if they did that, Trump would have pulled Kavanaugh back in August just because this was not a battle worth having when he could nominate a woman that is far more conservative than Kavanaugh.
But the Dems chose to sit on the information and then leak it to the press so they could turn this whole thing into a circus, which meant dragging both Ford and Kavanaugh into the mud. They did it to blow up the confirmation, but it's ultimately going to fail because it is now even more likely that Kavanaugh will be confirmed, but the Dems will have forever damaged this process. I do not doubt that if this situation comes up again, but in reverse roles, that Republicans will do the same thing. I think this is the beginning of how future appointment battles are going to be and that is very, very bad for the bench.
I can still say you lied about an FBI investigation for two weeks and you can’t deny it. The investigation will be done in a week and they’ll present congress with nothing new as no one can corroborate Ford’s account. Kavanaugh will be confirmed and you’ll start a thread crying about the FBI being corrupt.
We'll stop him.
Brosef, you have 200+ posts on this thread. You care...and it shows.
What investigation? Done by who? Please be specific.
Bro, I am interested in the case and the dilemmas, but I don't really care if Kavanaugh is put on the bench. I think he should be and I think this process was handled poorly, but if they nominate and confirm someone else and the person is qualified, I'm fine with that. It's not like I'm related to or friends with Kavanaugh.
Not the FBI investigation you lied about for two weeks.
lol I would not believe acosta
I laugh because that hearing involved few facts under oath that are going to be challenged. The FBI isn't going to have a big meeting about what a couple stupid things written in a year book mean and besides, you'll get 10 different answers depending on who you ask. That's not verifiable. If you want to get Kavanaugh for lying under oath, you need to find some evidence that shows he was at a party with Ford 35 years ago, at a minimum, and moreso a party with like 4-5 people and in the general location of where it was described to be by Ford. The chances of something like that happening (and that's assuming that the unverifiable story is true) is nearly impossible.
Again, relying on this makes you look desperate. The Dems wanted the investigation to stall the vote so they could try and dig up more accusers, no matter how outrageous the claim. They all know that there is nothing to investigate. If there was, they would have pushed Ford to file a complaint with the local police and have them investigate. They at least have jurisdiction to actually take legal action.
Who is conducting this investigation? Be specific
The comments are just
What if Sean Hannity tweeted that?
The FBI.
Who was conducting the investigation you lied about two weeks ago? Be specific.
Thread le says NOW.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
