Reply With Quote
Derp thinks someone must be laughing with him.
Poor derp
Streisand effect, tbh... then again, not sure why these people whine. Twitter is no different than Spurstalk banning Avante... it's not a democracy...
Derp thinks someone must be laughing with him.
Poor derp
Fairness and commerce rarely mix. Heavy hitters get more attention by everyone, they will therefore get more scrutiny. The one off types don't move the needle.That same thing was retweeted thousand times and twitter did not ban all retweeters
If tweeter banned all retweeters of fake news they would end up with about 10 members
By that same token, heavy hitters should get more la ude. Twitter is disrespecting a broad base of people with their targeting based on ideology.
You cannot get more scrutiny and more la ude at the same time. You either work under tighter restrictions or you don't. James Woods gets the benefit of having a large audience provided by Twitter. He doesn't also deserve to have leeway because of it. But it's a business so unless Woods is making Twitter millions, he's more of a liability than an asset, and that's how they treated him.
Woods is not a liability to Twitter.
lefties have the same gripe. maybe y'all should compare notes.
Tell us what exactly their gripe is.
god forbid anyone should deprive you of your precious victimhood
Free speech matters except when it doesn't
^^^hugging it tight.
never take off that victim slipper
I'm curious to know as well.
you guys are like baby birds, always dependent upon another stomach to digest your dinner.
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/201.../pers-a23.html
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/201.../goog-s19.html
https://www.salon.com/2017/10/18/fak...on-left-media/
https://www.michigandaily.com/sectio...alist-websites
https://mic.com/articles/190621/left...her#.HtyKrnNG0
https://dearkitty1.wordpress.com/201...tter-facebook/
With this "Russian meddling, fake news on social media ed Hillary" sites like Facebook and Twitter are afraid of being blamed for Trump.
We should also add that he becomes a liability when Twitter is called up to Congress to explain what they're doing about fake news. And Woods is certainly a big megaphone for some people that love to take the bait.
Woods is free to speak
Lol liability
What about cnn or Bullshington post ter accounts
They post more fake news than woods could ever
not only is Woods free to speak, the ban itself has given him a soap box and pissed off audience
Prove it
Why isn't his allegation good enough? Now proof is required?
https://www.dailywire.com/news/36227...-ryan-saavedra
I didn't realize the DNC was the party that reported this. I guess they really think their voters are that pathetic.
Repugs KNOW their base is ing pathetic, and will swallow any turd that Repugs excrete in their direction, swallow with drooling gusto.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 09-30-2018 at 12:51 PM.
The difference is wapo and cnn use twitter as a bridge to their own platforms. Wood's platform *is* twitter.
Comparing violent anarchists to people wanting to discuss the issues without sugarcoating.
:
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions