Reply With Quote
Your posts warrant little else. Lazy "own the libs" stuff.
You can't, or won't defend your chosen party's ideas, that that it has any.
While I'm sure the WH/Senate will both restrict the FBI into irrelevance AND ignore, even classify, the findings
it doesn't matter
K's nervous breakdown last Thu, ( stressed out much, Brett? maybe you'll feel how it is to live PTSD, lotsa beer helps ) and his repeated, proven lying is more than enough to conclude that he is unfit for ANY judge ship.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 10-01-2018 at 04:56 PM.
Your posts warrant little else. Lazy "own the libs" stuff.
You can't, or won't defend your chosen party's ideas, that that it has any.
The Last Week Tonight host summarized the Senate Judiciary Committee’s message as, “We believe you — we just don’t care.”
https://www.vox.com/2018/10/1/179247...t-week-tonight
John Oliver: Kavanaugh’s Senate hearing was a “ you” to women
If anything, Oliver said, Kavanaugh’s testimony only seemed to underline just how unfit he is for the Supreme Court — as well as cast even more aspersions on his supposed innocence. He specifically cited an exchange that Kavanaugh had with Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), in which she asked him whether he’d ever blacked out from drinking, and he responded, “I don’t know, have you?”
“Aside from being deeply disrespectful, ‘Have you?’ is just not the answer of an innocent person,” Oliver pointed out, noting just how easy it would have been to simply say no if that was in fact the truth. “If you ask someone if they ever blew a dog and they go, ‘I dunno, have you?’ that person blew a dog.”
HEY KAV, GET ED:
: The fact that Kavanaugh’s testimony was a mess didn’t actually matter. Some Republican senators — including Orrin Hatch (UT) and Lindsey Graham (SC) — had seemingly already made up their minds before the hearing began, as had the conservatives throwing their weight behind Kavanaugh’s nomination. It didn’t matter whether or not he’d committed sexual assault; he would further conservative goals, such as curtailing abortion rights, and that was that.
“It’s a stance that prioritizes human lives, as long as you think life begins at conception, stops right before a sexual assault, and then starts right back up again as soon as that assault is over,” Oliver said, earning raucous applause from his studio audience as he came to his central point: “It feels like they’re doing this just to deliver a ‘ you’ to Democrats and, even more directly, a ‘ you’ to women.”
JO is one the best journalists in USA and he's British joker.
He's addressed so much ed up in USA that commercial journalists won't / can't touch.
Jon Stewart’s disciples managed to simultaneously ruin comedy, journalism, and late night talk shows.
Looks like K's school/college "friends" are not friends who will cover up for him.
lawdy!
Bye RapeK.
That's kind of an easy out. I mean, the Kavanaugh allegation is very different from the other allegations in the Me Too Movement. For one, he was in high school and not in a position of power to be able to suppress his alleged victim. But also, the allegations against guys like Weinstein, Matt Lauer, and other movie stars or powerful people in the news is that there were multiple women that could allege times, places, and a pattern of behavior that demonstrated consistently what was going on.
The troubling part of this story is that it is an event that happened 35 years ago and there is no evidence of its existence. The witnesses that were alleged to be there have no memory of the event. And the lone accuser forgets so many important facts, like how she got there, who's house, how she got home, etc. and confuses her story that it is just as likely that if she was sexually assaulted, it was someone other than Kavanaugh. With all these questions unanswered, the allegation is nothing like say Harvey Weinstein or Russell Simmons. Yet people want to give Ford the presumption she is telling the truth in accusing Kavanaugh while presuming that Kavanaugh is lying on unverifiable allegations from 35 years ago. Look, I'm not saying that things didn't happen like Ford is saying, I'm just saying there is no evidence and no way to verify that what Ford is saying is true and that if she was sexually assaulted, it was Kavanaugh. That being the case, why are people acting like Kavanaugh must take the brunt of the me too movement? It's like all these protesters that are complaining that they were sexually assaulted are claiming that it is Kavanaugh that must be punished or stopped for what happened to them by someone else.
Mock this if you want, but any allegation made by Kavanaugh could be made against anyone. He won't be the last person that gets this type of allegation and the next person may be a Democrat. Caveat Emptor.
It’s only Monday and Kavanuagh caught lying under oath lol
"The troubling part of this story is that it is an event that happened 35 years ago and there is no evidence of its existence. "
Ford's claim is now irrelevant. I've gone way past it.
K's nervous stress breakdown on TV, even sniffly (coke sniffles) reading his prepared script/strategy, and repeated lying is evidence that he's unfit and should be impeached/convicted.
Some brown stuff running down Chris’ shorts.
Interesting gloss over RapeK's multiple perjuries. I bet he won't be working on that.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
