Manchin and Heitkamp Getting Are Pressure to Vote for Kavanaugh
The ultra-conservative Judicial Crisis Network (JCN) is spending big money to pressure red-state Democrats Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) to confirm Brett Kavanaugh.
JCN announced on Monday they will spend $400,000 this week on pushing Manchin and Heitkamp to support Kavanaugh.
They are the only undecided Democrats, and both are up for reelection next month.
By all accounts Kavanaugh remains short of the 50 votes needed to confirm him.
Three Republicans — Jeff Flake of Arizona, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Susan Collins of Maine — have not said for sure
they would support Kavanaugh when it comes to a vote on the floor of the Senate.
https://www.politicususa.com/2018/10...iticus+USA+%29
Oh she rembers she only had one beer but can not rember when the party was
He would never answer ANY question regarding his views on Presidential power in THIS hearing- claiming that a judge cannot weigh in on "political" issues.
His Right Wing conspiracy theory laced rant blew that lie out of the water - he most definitely weighed in on a political opinion - his own political biased opinion.
Ford is being attacked - but the hypocrites are using the Dems to attack her - saying they put her up to this - when she was the one that went to the Washington Post - on her own - before any Dem had a say.
You mean Feinstein - not Pelosi - has already rightfully defended her decision -
Her #1 concern was keeping the anonymity of the victim - but - as stated above - the victim herself reached out to the Washington post - when she saw that the repukes were going to ignore any allegation and speed-rush confirm Rapey Brett.
Everything refuted - but you won't see the truth in front of your face.
What's the difference between ^ that and you taking away their healthcare and putting them in cages and separating them from their parents?
Seems like killing them saves them the torture you would rather inflict. Neither way is virtuous.
Hillary, Obama, Jr, Sr, Billy, Reagan, Carter, etc, etc
Ding
ducks lets see if this can be proven.
If so, what a huge cup of STFU for the snowflakes.
Ford is irrelevant, now. Even if she is totally discredited, it doesn't matter.
K's lying to Congress and lying about everything, his extreme partisanship rat ing career, plus his nervous breakdown last Thu are his failings, his unfitness for SCOTUS
Rightwing hate media is after Ford to slime her as a hysterical woman, and because she's attacking a man whom they see their proxy for themselves as racist, misogynist bags.
smh.
You will fall for anything.
You are seriously the most gullible person I have ever had to read text from, outside of mouse.
i dont even need to click on that to say it's probably not true
Because Dr. Ford requested that her name be kept out of it. She requested that.
Or through your red goggles are you blind to that, 101a?
She could still have anonymity, if not for Feinstein and the legal team she recommended.
Last edited by DarrinS; 10-02-2018 at 10:27 AM.
What a load. Judge Bluto is still a Clinton conspiracy theorist twenty years later, as evidenced by his crying opening statement at the hearing.
What Kavanaugh actually said about political power was this: “I don’t think we want judges commenting on the latest political controversy because that would ultimately leave people to doubt whether we are independent,”
What he said about whether a president can be subpoenaed is this: Can a sitting president be required to respond to a subpoena? “I can’t give you an answer on that hypothetical question,”
You've successfully morphed two answers into one to fit your narrative.
Ford is not being attacked, but the Democrats have certainly exploited her - including her own attorneys. SHE testified that she would rather have met in private in California, but unless she perjured herself, somehow she didn't know that was on the table. Feinstein wanted anything but for her to remain anonymous. She wanted the (36 year old, uncorroborated allegation without evidence to get AS MUCH TRACTION AND ATTENTION as possible - that is done by behaving exactly as she did.Ford is being attacked - but the hypocrites are using the Dems to attack her - saying they put her up to this - when she was the one that went to the Washington Post - on her own - before any Dem had a say.
The Republicans found out about the letter pretty much at the same time as everyone else - when the story was published. How could they rush the nomination before the allegation, when they didn't know it was out there? Once Feinstein got Katz involved, the objective wasn't protecting Ford's anonymity, it was hyper-publicizing her. Again, can you explain how Ford didn't know this could happen without her getting on a scary airplane and in front of the klieg lights?You mean Feinstein - not Pelosi - has already rightfully defended her decision -
Her #1 concern was keeping the anonymity of the victim - but - as stated above - the victim herself reached out to the Washington post - when she saw that the repukes were going to ignore any allegation and speed-rush confirm Rapey Brett.
Just seeing if you can read this.Everything refuted - but you won't see the truth in front of your face.
So you haven't read the article he wrote in 2009, huh?
[tweet]
Fraud Ludington
I'm actually impressed by the paper - Kavanaugh admits he has possibly changed his position - something 99.9% of this board NEVER do.
Wow. the "artist" and everyone who thinks that is funny or at all appropriate.
RandomGuy what are your thoughts on Swetnick? I’ve been told women don’t lie about these things.
what are they afraid of hiding her medical records
Poor little paranoid, sniffy, sniffling K, wimmen beatin up on him
Republicans have a strategy to save Kavanaugh. It exposes Trumpism at its worst.
the South Carolina Republican showcased what is emerging in some quarters as the last-ditch strategy to save Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination — a strategy that exposes Trumpism at its ugliest.
“This good man should not be destroyed,”
if two GOP senators end up opposing him —
it will “end up legitimizing” the “destruction of a good person” by a “horrible process.”
if Kavanaugh goes down, President Trump should renominate him, and
push for another vote by barnstorming in states that Trump won. In other words,
Trump should whip his voters into a rage over the profound injustice of such an outcome.
Graham’s basic claim is also at the core of a big new campaign to rescue Kavanaugh.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...nl_most&wpmm=1
“This good man should not be destroyed,”
It's a ing job interview for an lying bag who already lied his way into, already has a Federal lifetime job,
Destroy?
Last edited by boutons_deux; 10-02-2018 at 11:01 AM.
oh well is jason beale of the federalist says so...
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
