Brett Kavanaugh now under FBI investigation

[monosylab1k]

And all those that cheered and applauded.

Hillary really nailed the deplorable comment. The one thing she got right in 2016.

The fact that she backtracked and apologized is what’s wrong with Democrats. The game has changed and they’re still not up to speed.

[Reck]

The fact that she backtracked and apologized is what’s wrong with Democrats. The game has changed and they’re still not up to speed.

No doubt about it.

They're too quick to give in. Just look at Franken and Schneider for example. Accused of sexual assault and resign within the day. Had it being a republican, they'd still be there right now.

[boutons_deux]

The fact that she backtracked and apologized is what’s wrong with Democrats. The game has changed and they’re still not up to speed.

the deplorables can't handle the truth that they are racist, xenophobic, misognyst, gun fellatin, Bible humpin, science-denying deplorables, aka, Trash's base.

[Winehole23]

Vince Foster tie-in?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/sinister-...202425923.html

[TSA]

Therapist much more reliable than jilted X.
Get real. You are pulling a blu team stretch hoping for more women.

You are aware Ford never named Kavanaugh when speaking to her therapist correct?

[in2deep]

Hillary picked a fight with the deplorables and lost

sure next democrat can try it and see if they are successful this time. It would be employing politics of division and hate which Trump and 3rd world candidates do.

basically sure they can stoop to Trump level but deplorables are still abot 50% of goters so still a toss up

basically the most successful extreme candidate will win just like it happens in 3rd world country

[DarrinS]

Trump Says It’s a Very Scary Time for Men, Because Women Can Vote Them Out of Office

https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trump-says-its-very-scary-time-for-men-because-women-can-vote-them-out-of-office

You go to so much trouble to hide your unfunny borowitz link. Why?

[TSA]

You were the one who posted an irrelevant video tweet that you thought somehow showed her lying.

Also you're the conspira of the board so I'd be careful pointing fingers on who's stupider or have a learning disability because by my count, you keep making the same dumbass mistakes over and over again.

The video was very relevant, you were just too stupid to figure it out.

[Reck]

The video was very relevant, you were just too stupid to figure it out.

How was it relevant? Did it showed she lied or that she gave pointers to other people on how to lie on a polygraph test?

Try not to run from these questions and actually answer them this time, pizza boy.

[Trainwreck2100]

If you disagree that the description is a very accurate to what he said then no. You didnt really watch it. You kight have played it but you didnt watch.

That makes no sense

[TSA]

How was it relevant? Did it showed she lied or that she gave pointers to other people on how to lie on a plygraph test?

Try not to run from these questions and actually answer them this time, pizza boy.

I shouldn’t even have to answer these questions as anyone with the slightest bit of intelligence would have already figured it out on their own.

Her ex-boyfriend said under penalty of perjury that he witnessed Ford coaching her friend for a polygraph. Ford was asked under oath if she’d ever coached anyone for a polygraph and she answered never.

Do you have any other idiotic questions?

[hater]

That makes no sense

Exactly. Makes no sense you said u watched it and disagree with my post

[monosylab1k]

I shouldn’t even have to answer these questions as anyone with the slightest bit of intelligence would have already figured it out on their own.

Her ex-boyfriend said under penalty of perjury that he witnessed Ford coaching her friend for a polygraph. Ford was asked under oath if she’d ever coached anyone for a polygraph and she answered never.

Do you have any other idiotic questions?

Statements made under penalty of perjury are good now? Great, I’m glad you support Julie Swetnick.

[boutons_deux]

Hillary picked a fight with the deplorables and lost

her deplorables comment did not cost her any votes from deplorables (and they are deplorable Trash's deplorable base)

she won the popular vote, while Comey and Pooting handed the election to Trash

[TSA]

Statements made under penalty of perjury are good now? Great, I’m glad you support Julie Swetnick.

I don’t support Julie Swetnick and think she is 100% lying, but she knows nobody is going to go after a “victim” for perjury. Do you support Julie Swetnick? Yes or no.

[monosylab1k]

I don’t support Julie Swetnick and think she is 100% lying, but she knows nobody is going to go after a “victim” for perjury. Do you support Julie Swetnick? Yes or no.

So statements made under penalty of perjury are only good when it helps your side? Figured.

[TSA]

So statements made under penalty of perjury are only good when it helps your side? Figured.

Statements made under penalty of perjury are neither good nor bad, they are simply statements made under penalty of perjury.

Do you support Julie Swetnick? Yes or no.

[monosylab1k]

Statements made under penalty of perjury are neither good nor bad, they are simply statements made under penalty of perjury.

So what’s your criteria for believing one and not the other? Is it whether or not the statement helps your side?

[ducks]

Donald J. Trump
realDonaldTrump
·
3h
I see it each time I go out to Rallies in order to help some of our great Republican candidates. VOTERS ARE REALLY ANGRY AT THE VICIOUS AND DE ABLE WAY DEMOCRATS ARE TREATING BRETT KAVANAUGH! He and his wonderful family deserve much better.


THE TRUTH!

[Reck]

I shouldn’t even have to answer these questions as anyone with the slightest bit of intelligence would have already figured it out on their own.

Her ex-boyfriend said under penalty of perjury that he witnessed Ford coaching her friend for a polygraph. Ford was asked under oath if she’d ever coached anyone for a polygraph and she answered never.

Do you have any other idiotic questions?

Where have I heard this before?

Oh yeah, Mark Judge was also under "penalty of perjury" as well. When asked to produced the do ented statement of facts, it turned out he didn''t sign anything, it was his attorney.

Even then, republicans won't act on it and you know it.

But hey, let's see this "friend" and the signed statement. If it squares, let's get these republicans to charge her with perjury.

Seems like you're alone in this. I dont see any republican senators asking for head lying head.

[TSA]

So what’s your criteria for believing one and not the other? Is it whether or not the statement helps your side?

Question pending pussy. Your reluctance to answer makes me think we have the same criteria on believability.

Do you support Julie Swetnick? Yes or no.

[TSA]

Where have I heard this before?

Oh yeah, Mark Judge was also under "penalty of perjury" as well. When asked to produced the do ented statement of facts, it turned out he didn''t sign anything, it was his attorney.

Even then, republicans won't act on it and you know it.

But hey, let's see this "friend" and the signed statement. If it squares, let's get these republicans to charge her with perjury.

Seems like you're alone in this. I dont see any republican senators asking for head lying head.

I never called for Republican Senators to go after Ford if she lied under oath.
You’re too stupid to deal with right now I’m done.

[TSA]

Christine Blasey Ford's changing Kavanaugh assault story leaves her short on credibility

https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/1497661...mpression=true

[monosylab1k]

Question pending pussy. Your reluctance to answer makes me think we have the same criteria on believability.

Do you support Julie Swetnick? Yes or no.

Nope, I think she’s lying her ass off and is being paid by Avenatti to do so. I think Avenatti is absolute s , and if in some bizarro timeline he is the Democratic nominee in 2020, I wouldn’t hesitate to vote for Trump. I don’t blindly support my “team”.

[monosylab1k]

So what’s your criteria for believing one and not the other? Is it whether or not the statement helps your side?