Reply With Quote
Hey I know who we can get to counteract the image of Repubs as old white farts:
Oh, please Ducks. You are making conservatives look as unhinged as Boutons makes liberals look.
Hey I know who we can get to counteract the image of Repubs as old white farts:
Male Student S s Out $12,000 In Legal Defense After Female Student Changes Mind About Consensual Hookup
https://www.dailywire.com/news/36964...mpaign=dwbrand
What if that was you males ?
FBI's Wray confirms White House limited Kavanaugh probe
FBI Director Christopher Wray told the Senate on Wednesday that the White House put limits on the re-opened investigation into Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh,
but the law enforcement chief insisted that the process used was a typical one.ok!
the inquiry was "very specific in scope
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...e-limit-888667
So Senate had a huge of docs on K that was ignored,
FBI 6 b/g checks were ignored and DIDN't exonerate,
WH limited the rape stuff, while
FBI ignored all the sex and drinking lies verified by K's classmates, friends, whatever.
Trash and Repugs give America a huge ALL Y'ALL
If you have all those guns whats the panic room for?
Also followup question..how do you shoot the guns at the invading people when you're in the panic room?
We give you a big You Boo!
The panic room has a turret i think
It not a panic room wad. It a safe/closet big enough to walk in. Give it the up.
Like we have been saying:FBI's Wray confirms White House limited Kavanaugh probe
FBI Director Christopher Wray told the Senate on Wednesday that the White House put limits on the re-opened investigation into Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh,
but the law enforcement chief insisted that the process used was a typical one.
the inquiry was "very specific in scope
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...e-limit-888667
So Senate had a huge of docs on K that was ignored,
FBI 6 b/g checks were ignored and DIDN't exonerate,
WH limited the rape stuff, while
FBI ignored all the sex and drinking lies verified by K's classmates, friends, whatever.
Trash and Repugs give America a huge ALL Y'ALL
COVERUP and a SHAM.
D A R V O in action
Boy sues school for gender discrimination over expulsion after admitting to sexual harassment
a high school student and his father in Virginia are trying to sue for gender discrimination after the school expelled the boy for sexually assaulting and harassing female students.
The school did an investigation and found him responsible for committing those acts, and
he was forced to transfer to an alternative school.
He even confessed to exposing his genitals
and making sexually explicit remarks, but said they were just “jokes.”
In true Betsy Devos-esque behavior,
the student punished for assault is framing himself as the true victim here.
From the Washington Post:the attorney for the plaintiff said that
The boy and his father say media reports that
“suggest the pervasive nature of sexual assault committed by male students” influenced Fairfax’s treatment of the student,
who has a 4.1 grade-point average and belonged to the crew team and drama club.
School officials, according to the lawsuit, refused to believe the student because “he is male and would have believed a female student in the same situation.”
getting expelled from school is worse than a criminal conviction.https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/10/1803082/-Boy-sues-school-for-gender-discrimination-after-expulsion-for-admitting-to-sexual-harassment?utm_campaign=trending
The punishment, Binnall said,
could harm his client’s college and career prospects.
“These findings are just awful for anyone who wants a future,” he said.
“It’s worse than a criminal conviction, or just as bad.”
Lawyers will say and do anything for $$$
Last edited by boutons_deux; 10-11-2018 at 05:32 AM.
News flash: Kavanaugh is a conservative judge.
Was I right though? Does the panic room have a gun turret?
Whoa! True if huge
Chris gonna be so excited when he finds out hes a conservative
'What Goes Around, Comes Around': Kavanaugh's Snarl Takes on New Meaning Now That He's a U.S. Supreme Court Justice
"So no matter how genteelly he forces himself to behave in the future," warns Naomi Klein, "remember that the snarl was the truth - not just about his character but about his true purpose on the bench."
author and journalist Naomi Klein posited that it is more important than ever to understand that moment and recognize the profound ramifications it will have going forward now that Justice Kavanaugh is a reality.
"The Coming Kavanaugh Court Doctrine: Democrats Are Uncons utional"
—the threat of "what goes around comes around" could have serious implications for "cases that help Republicans and harm Democrats" in the future.
"Essentially what he did is he took his mask off and he revealed himself as a politician who wears a robe,"
Kavanaugh is being appointed not *in spite* of that snarl but precisely because of it.
he is a snarling gargoyle who can be counted on
not just to defend himself but
the whole damn frat known as the Republican Party + its billionaire backers.
Against all threats to their power + wealth.
He has shown he will do whatever it takes to protect them. That's why he was worth backing despite his copious baggage.
remember that the snarl was the truth - not just about his character but about his true purpose on the bench.
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2018/10/07/what-goes-around-comes-around-kavanaughs-snarl-takes-new-meaning-now-hes-us-supreme
Roberts asks federal judges to handle Kavanaugh complaints
Could this investigation have serious repercussions? Or is it a way to sweep this under the rug?
By Mark Sherman | AP
It’s possible the complaints will never be investigated if the lower-court judges determine they have no jurisdiction over a Supreme Court justice under the judiciary’s ethics rules.
The judges may be forced to conclude “that intervening events have rendered the allegations moot or make remedial action impossible,” said Arthur man, an ethics professor at the University of Pittsburgh.
Another ethicist, Stephen Gillers of New York University, disagreed that the complaints are moot.
Kavanaugh remains a federal judge and the complaints “allege misconduct that occurred while Kavanaugh was on the D.C. Circuit and subject to the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges.
Any violation of the Code does not disappear because he is now on another federal court,” Gillers said in an email.
But Gillers said the complaints “may be found not to be meritorious in the end.”
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...tail=emaildkre
whitewashing imminent, handslapping at very worst
Susan Collins Gets Six Figure Dark Money Payback For Kavanaugh"Yes" Vote. But It's Not A "Bribe".
Susan Collins Gets ‘Six Figure’ Payback From Dark Money Group After Voting ‘Yes’ On Kavanaugh
A “dark money” group that spent millions promoting Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation effort announced on Tuesday that it’s
rewarding Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) with a new “six-figure TV and digital ad campaign” in support of her re-election after she voted for Kavanaugh’s confirmation.
The group, Judicial Crisis Network, issued a press release expressing its gra ude to Collins for her “yes” vote.
“Thank you Susan Collins for thoughtfully reviewing Judge Kavanaugh’s judicial record and weighing the evidence, and
for being a reasonable voice during this incredibly divisive time,” Carrie Severino, the group’s chief counsel and policy director, said.
Judicial Crisis Network was one of several well-funded dark money groups to support the accused sexual assaulter’s nomination.
This raises a serious question: Did Collins accept a bribe in exchange for her vote?
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...tail=emaildkre
I was responding directly to Chris, silly
that's just the way it works now. unless there's an explicit quid pro quo, it's not bribery. rewarding a politician for doing something you like post-facto isn't considered corrupt anymore.
btw, the JCN also sprung for a 1.5 million dollars in TV ads for Kavanaugh.
stakes just went up for Supreme Court confirmations.
I know thats what makes it all so great
There are at least 15 ethics complaints against Kavanaugh. Will he be held accountable?
Complaints against Brett Kavanaugh in the D.C. Circuit, the federal appeals court that hears appeals from D.C., have just been passed along a second time.
challenging as unethical Kavanaugh’s statements during his first Senate confirmation hearing and his response to allegations of sexual assault.
Here’s the money passage from the first complaint, filed by the Democratic Coalition:
Kavanaugh violated Canons 1 and 2 of Code of Judicial Conduct by committing crimes of dishonesty while he was a federal judge,
by obtaining confirmation of his appointment as a federal judge by false and perjurious testimony,
by concealing and covering up his criminal actions and by obstructing justice.
He is unfit to serve as a judge by reason of his corrupt, unscrupulous, dishonest and criminal conduct.
The complaint points to Kavanaugh’s claim that he didn’t use materials stolen from Democratic offices by a Republican operative, Manuel Miranda, and had no knowledge of the offense.
Enter the second complaint filed, also from the coalition;
it takes aim at Kavanaugh’s “public and partisan campaign of lies to cover-up [sic] and conceal sexual misconduct and crimes he committed in the past.”
The complaint cites his appearance on Fox News and perjury before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
As the number of complaints grew, Garland recused himself from reviewing them, without saying more, and
the complaints went to the next-most senior judge,
Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson, a George H. W. Bush appointee.
On Oct. 6, Henderson released a statement concerning the ethics complaints against Kavanaugh.Judge Timothy Tymkovich, a George W. Bush appointee
Under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act (28 U.S.C. §§351-364) any person may file a misconduct complaint against a federal judge in the circuit in which the federal judge sits.
After the start of Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings, members of the general public began filing complaints in the D.C. Circuit about statements made during those hearings.
The complaints do not pertain to any conduct in which Judge Kavanaugh engaged as a judge.
The complaints seek investigations only of the public statements he has made as a nominee to the Supreme Court of the United States.
There’s little doubt that, should the court investigate, they’ll find Kavanaugh didn’t just violate but set fire to the judicial canon of ethics.
Under that canon, perjury matters in and of itself, regardless of content.
So too does partisanship.
When I clerked on a federal appellate court, even our gym gear and bumper stickers were policed.
Problem is, Supreme Court justices aren’t subject to the canon of ethics. Still, there’s hope. The D.C. Circuit limited its consideration of complaints against Kavanaugh to those relating to his behavior while serving as a federal appellate judge.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...ld-accountable
The democracts like the live in the past results and try to change those outcomes instead of trying to run on what they would do if elected
The GOP does the same thing with Healthcare...didn't they vote for it too? Didn't they negotiate it in committee?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
