Your mom pees her pants!
it's called sarcasm.
Leftist frequently argue the male and female chest are equivalent. By that standard this is very serious.
Also I'm not giving women a free pass. That would sexist.
Is this your standard, Nathan?
Yes or no.
It's standard I've learned from the left. But seemingly a fake standard that they only espouse verbally in confined limited context because I've yet to see them react accordingly to a man being sexually assaulted on the chest.
Is this your standard, Nathan?
Yes or no.
alt-right street violence. looks pretty cowardly from the vids.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-New-York.html
orly, no takes on this?
Jacob got a liberal arts degree and worked at target. Sounds like a democrat.
They claimed to be attacked first. A little restraint would go a long ways though. Antifa vandalized the establishment before the event and sent a threatening letter. Antifa could very easily have started the fight and got their ass beat. Of course I don't support kicking defeated people while on the ground.
There is your take.
You don't know what happened, but you presume the Proud Boys were justified for their gang style beat down of two or three protesters.
To any conservative that goes to events where you have a decent chance of conflict: do not start fights, show constraint when defending yourself, and the more cameras the better.
Remarkable restraint on display.
No, I said what they claimed. And I said if what they claim is true they still shouldn't beat those on the ground.
well, they did. that's who they are.
That was weak.![]()
Just because I don't support it I understand it will happen very often. Antifa already created a heated environment by vandalizing the establishment and sending a threatening letter. If they attacked first people are likely to go overboard. And there were proud boys yelling "stop" at the other proud boys. So basically a statistical certainty given all the factors. The main unknown is who started the fight. Whoever did that is most to blame.
Man, you are all in for these Proud Boys and their violence.
lol statistical certainty
If group "a" is attacked by group "b" after group "b" vandalized and threatened group "a" it is a statistical certainty someone or a few people from group "a" will go overboard when beating up the weak of group "b". However there will also be people from group "a" yelling at others to "stop" and attempting to break things up. As you see in this case.
not nearly as craven as what the proud boys did, but yeah, that was some weak .
Do you agree with your Proud Boy, Nathan?
Yes or no.
One of your boys, Nathan:
Certainly looks like he's just there to peacefully protest....something....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)