Did Obama Forget Marbury v. Madison?

[boutons_deux]

"they strike the entire law and we have to start over"

Repugs will block any more health care reform. It will probably be decades before national health care reform is passed.

The Repugs will not do anything to reduce the exorbitant health care prices. They will deny health care govt expenditures to sick, poor, disabled, young.

[Wild Cobra]

We should not forget:

[Winehole23]

You owe him a box of wine

Appreciate the sentiment, but my access to wine is more or less unhindered. I'm not wanting for wine, nor would I demand it as tribute for allegedly helpful bulletin board replies, so alas, I must decline your generous offer of someone else's generosity...

[Winehole23]

Nothing against the box wine. Nothing at all.

Some of that's pretty good wine nowadays, the price point is good and it stays fresher longer in a vacuum sealed bag than it would in a bottle...

[boutons_deux]

We should not forget:

St Ronnie was dumb fool, a wealthy tool for the VRWC.

for-profit, capitalist "medicine" is sucking Human-Americans dry ($15K+/year just for insurance for family of 4, projected at nearly $25K in 10 years), while "death panelling for profit" 10s of Ms.

American sheeple just bend over and take it.

But some don't, and many can't, so:

http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financ...alk_surowiecki

[spursncowboys]

Appreciate the sentiment, but my access to wine is more or less unhindered. I'm not wanting for wine, nor would I demand it as tribute for allegedly helpful bulletin board replies, so alas, I must decline your generous offer of someone else's generosity...

[Winehole23]

interesting thread about "judicial supremacy", court-packing and how mass politics affects SCOTUS.

focus is on the aftermath of the Dred Scott decision.

[Spurtacular]

No, he didn't forget it. He didn't say the court didn't have the right of review.

He made the point that unelected judges should not overturn law. Try to keep up, 2012 pavlov.

[Pavlov]

He made the point that unelected judges should not overturn law. Try to keep up, 2012 pavlov.

lol no, derp.

You're wrong.

Again.

[Spurtacular]

lol no, derp.

You're wrong.

Again.

sociopath truth

[Pavlov]

sociopath truth

Obama said the law was cons utional therefore the SCOTUS shouldn't overturn it.

Did SCOTUS overturn it, derp?

Yes or no.

Tell the truth.

[spurraider21]

from the OP

Here is what President Obama said today:

I would just remind conservative commentators that for years what we've heard is the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly cons uted and passed law. Well, this is a good example.

he was absolutely right. the hypocrisy is mind boggling. the same people who whine about "activist judges" are the same ones who were cheerleading for SCOTUS to overturn obamacare.

barry didnt claim SCOTUS didn't have the authority to review law, he was shoving those people's own ideology back in their face

[Pavlov]

at how indignant CC was about Black President over this.

The Presidents comments were not intended for the consumption of politically astute individuals that attempt to understand the cons ution and separation of powers...they were cynically intended for the unfortunately vast under educated rabble that will take anything that President Obama says as unassailable fact. I really find that cynicism in his position reprehensible.

The fact that the mainstream media didn't call him out on his ridiculous comments is even more reprehensible.

The most he can say about Trump is Lookit all the tail he gets!

[Spurtacular]

Obama said the law was cons utional therefore the SCOTUS shouldn't overturn it.

Did SCOTUS overturn it, derp?

Yes or no.

Tell the truth.

Giving one part of the argument doesn't negate the other part of the argument.

Today's do ented sociopath.

[Pavlov]

Giving one part of the argument doesn't negate the other part of the argument.

what are you even talking about?

Here's the quote again:

I would just remind conservative commentators that for years what we've heard is the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly cons uted and passed law. Well, this is a good example.

What are you saying is his argument, derp?

[boutons_deux]

"5th Circuit Court of Appeals"

the rigged, stuffed, hyperconservative 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ? dubya- bag Priscilla ing Owen's court? LMFAO