Reply With Quote
Your 2020 candidate
Democracy.
Your 2020 candidate
Doesn't that mean they'd have to investigate Kavanaugh's prep school career?
Signed,
Perplexed
Simply put, the sworn statement Mr. Avenatti provided the Committee on October 2 appears to be an outright fraud. According to NBC News, the purported declarant denied - both before and after the sworn statement was released - the key allegations Mr. Avenatti attributed to her. She stated she was clear and consistent “from day one” with Mr. Avenatti that those claims were not true. And she said Mr. Avenatti “twisted [her] words.” When reporters pressed him on these discrepancies, Mr. Avenatti attempted to deceive them in an apparent effort to thwart the truth coming out.
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo...s_Redacted.pdf
You only like tax dodgers when they dodge the draft too, I guess?
senile off bag Grassley and accomplices intimidating anybody thinking of opposing Repugs
I dont know why republicans want to put Kavanaugh back on the news. You cant investigate Avennati and his client without getting Kavanaugh involve too.
Republicans won, got rapeK on the SCOTUS, got a boost of support from their base and yet here they are looking for more. Ever heard of the saying "leaving sleeping dogs lie?"
This is good news actually - the Kavanaugh coverup gets a closer look.
No, no one has ever heard the saying “leaving sleeping dogs lie”. That’s not a saying, “let sleeping dogs lie” is a saying.
Half the time I think your word salad and odd word choice is from re ation and the other half of the time I think it’s because you were foreign born. So are you re ed, foreign born, or both? And what country were you originally from before landing in New York?
So instead of addressing the valid points I make you go on a personal insult rant.
Like you need your pushed in even more today, ricin/pizza boy. Isn't that right, cuck?
Draft dodging is a good thing. Tax dodging is not. If everyone dodged their taxes, there would be no federal services. Although I will say that congressmen/staff/presidents etc are overpaid.
you should know, right? haha
cuckSo instead of addressing the valid points I make you go on a personal insult rant.
Like you need your pushed in even more today, ricin/pizza boy. Isn't that right, cuck?ouch
You didn’t really make any valid points. They already have Avenatti’s sworn statement. Now they just need the declarant to testify.
“Simply put, the sworn statement Mr. Avenatti provided the Committee on October 2 appears to be an outright fraud. According to NBC News, the purported declarant denied - both before and after the sworn statement was released - the key allegations Mr. Avenatti attributed to her. She stated she was clear and consistent “from day one” with Mr. Avenatti that those claims were not true. And she said Mr. Avenatti “twisted [her] words.” When reporters pressed him on these discrepancies, Mr. Avenatti attempted to deceive them in an apparent effort to thwart the truth coming out.”
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo...s_Redacted.pdf
So, what country were you originally from before landing in New York?
Yeah that's nothing new and does not address my post at all. Why are you interested in where I'm from? A bit creepy but I dont mind telling you where I'm from. It's a place called America.cuck
You didn’t really make any valid points. They already have Avenatti’s sworn statement. Now they just need the declarant to testify.
“Simply put, the sworn statement Mr. Avenatti provided the Committee on October 2 appears to be an outright fraud. According to NBC News, the purported declarant denied - both before and after the sworn statement was released - the key allegations Mr. Avenatti attributed to her. She stated she was clear and consistent “from day one” with Mr. Avenatti that those claims were not true. And she said Mr. Avenatti “twisted [her] words.” When reporters pressed him on these discrepancies, Mr. Avenatti attempted to deceive them in an apparent effort to thwart the truth coming out.”
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo...s_Redacted.pdf
So, what country were you originally from before landing in New York?
Look it up. It's currently being run into the ground. Want more info? My parents are Italian-American. lol
There wasn’t anything to address in your post. You think this criminal referral will be a problem for Kavanaugh, it won’t.
I’m interested in where you’re from because of how often you phrase and say things that just odd if you were born here.
A lot of your sentences and their structure look like they were run through an English translator program.
leaving sleeping dogs lie lol
I didn't say it would be a problem for Kavanaugh. I said he would need to be involved in that process of investigation.
And yeah you got me, I totally care how well I write on a board with 99% of trolls. You can tell I do because I capitalize letters and such. Auto correct gives me an A on efforts every single time.
Of all the re ed things you could argue you chose this.
But that’s not a point it’s just a given. What was your point/points you didn’t think I addressed?
You’re the one who said “ever heard of the saying” and then posted something that isn’t a sayingAnd yeah you got me, I totally care how well I write on a board with 99% of trolls. You can tell I do because I capitalize letters and such. Auto correct gives me an A on efforts every single time.
Of all the re ed things you could argue you chose this.
I’m not arguing I’m just curious and asking you questions. And I never said anything about your spelling, it’s your word choice and sentence structure. It’s just odd, that’s all I’m saying.
For starters the tweet.
They're not my points as much as they are Avenatti's.
How do you send a criminal referral to the DOJ for some particulars and think the involvement of the center figure wouldn't be needed? At the very least the FBI would actually have to do an investigation into the allegations that Kavanaugh did these things in full. Not just politely asking 2 questions and excluding key witnesses like Ford, this chick and all of the Kavanaugh's class mates who actually said Ford was not lying about his drinking and whatnot.
So instead of addressing the valid points I make you go on a personal insult rant.why won’t you address the points I didn’t make
Concerning this criminal referral Kavanaugh doesn’t even need to testify again. Only Avenatti and the declarant need to testify. The criminal referral has to do with Avenatti’s sworn statement.
“the purported declarant denied - both before and after the sworn statement was released - the key allegations Mr. Avenatti attributed to her.”
You're too stupid to string together proper sentences and to know the difference between "too" and "to".
Grassley should be investigating the Kavanaugh lies while he's at it...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions