Reply With Quote
I answered it. I literally gave you the number you were crying for.still not answering the question.
Yes, they are "in part". That's a meaningless statement though without knowing the significance of it. And the significance of it probably drops much more in the more relevant violent crimes.
I answered it. I literally gave you the number you were crying for.
Still looking for an out.
Still looking for an out.just another question that made you yourself.
Based on what?
Your spidey sense? You've given us nothing more to go on.
Thanks by the way for your acknowledgement of ins utional racism, even though you arbitrarily declared it meaningless in yor next breath.
I recognize different sentencing between demographics men have a multiplier of time over women. Black men have an extra multiplier. Hispanic men likely fall in between white men and black men.
I didn't declare it meaningless overall. The significance of the impact is just much more relevant. Or it's very important to the discussion.
Says you based on you. You've adduced no empirical support for your views.
You don't need statistics to back up what I'm saying. "In part" is vague. That could be very significant or of little significance.
Allow me to explain it
Blacks often have juvenile records (break their probation and/or don't bother sealing their records). Furthermore they are more likely to be represented by a public defender. I had a DUI case and my hired attorney went in and argued behind closed doors for a technicality. I know because afterwards when I was presented with my updated charges - another attorney walking by stopped and told me I was very lucky because there was a debate and the courtroom was split. My hired attorney also presented that I am a working student with a healthy family etc.
Furthermore I had a normal haircut and respectable clothing. I saw other individuals wearing street clothes, not covering their tattoos AND smug/"ya/na" responses to answers. The judge takes 1 peak at you from his paperwork and draws a conclusion. That is why men of uniform wear it to court
If you are too dumb/lazy/arrogant to put your best foot forward in court - tough luck. It also illustrates court is not a big moment in your life and chances are you'll be back
Last edited by FrostKing; 10-27-2018 at 10:52 PM.
You've given no empirical support for your opinions that white people are not dangerous and that immigrants are. Or that their culture is dangerous .
Just pointing that out.
I've given empirical support that US natives are more likely to commit crimes than immigrants. Also that the period of heaviest illegal immigration correlates with a historic decrease in crime. You've given nothing of the sort to support your views.
Last edited by Winehole23; 10-27-2018 at 11:16 PM.
Except the stuff from Chuck that says Hispanics are stupider than other groups.
By the way, I still object to characterizing the problem with immigration as being a Central American issue. The present and future trend is Asia.
Not that that's a problem either. Not a demonstrated problem, and neither is immigration from Central America.
Your resentment does and doesn't make it a problem.
the exodus is actually a Trash false flag.
His foundation/reelection fund paid all those asylum seekers to go marching so Trash could stoke his racist, xenophobic mob as a campaign tactic.
TRUST ME
People say Trump is just using the Caravan for political purposes but his reaction seem truly visceral. He hates the caravan. It's easy to tell when he's pretending to care about something but the caravan has sent him into a panic.
We can't all be good cucks like you and lie down and take it.
Take what?We can't all be good cucks like you and lie down and take it.
Wait, you're not a doctor?
What is your psychological/psychiatric training?
he hates non-whites.
If the caravan people arrives and some get in, failing, illegit, so-called Pres Trash would look like a pushover for the hated, filthy, diseased, criminal brownies, which his base wouldn't like.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 10-28-2018 at 10:07 AM.
I will say this... if the distinction between asylum seekers and economic migrant matters and is even possible to distinguish, then aren't asylum seekers basically undermining their own claims by not seeking asylum in Mexico? Doesn't it make it obvious that they are economic migrants.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
