Reply With Quote
Nathan seems to think they're marching straight for the voting booth.
A frenzy? — you should be a journalist, tbh.
Nathan seems to think they're marching straight for the voting booth.
You should say why this caravan is such a problem
Nothing I said indicates that.
Pueblo Sin Fronteras
People without borders
lol you're so full of , Darrin.
We saw the lefts reaction to Kavanaugh pre accusation. If the country was being flooded with future republican voters I think they'd be singing a different tune. Since it's not though let's just paint 10s of millions of your fellow Americans as racist for trying to prevent the ruining of the country.
"flooded"
so scared
how are immigrants ruining the country? no one ITT has offered any plausible explanation.
Legal immigrants aren’t ruining the country.
how are illegal immigrants ruining this country?
The same way Kavanaugh will ruin the country or 9 Kavanaughs if we were flooding the country with Republicans. I guess you could say it's a matter of perspective and one perspective is being drowned out. That's why I think it would be best for the country to split in two.
Chain migration is a problem with legal immigration though. Premium legal immigrants are wanted and a necessity for the country.
This is completely unrelated to the question I asked. Why did you post this?
The question again: Who is suggesting we shouldn't do ent who's coming in and reject felons?
immigrants seldom come with any US political affiliation, but what you and the GOP are saying couldn't possibly help.
why is chain migration a problem?
The only mainstream discussion happening is about illegals stop saying immigrants. Although chain migration is a problem with that. It's disingenuous to conflate the two. The bulk of the conversation is about illegals. And it's absurd to think Americans should be silent on things they have problems with.
immigrants seldom come with any US political affiliation, but what you and the GOP are saying couldn't possibly help.
Underperforming populations are going to vote for the free party. On top that they are going to be more likely to vote how the Hispanics community that they'll be living in will vote.
brown skin+ Spanish surname = underperforming. (based on SATs and "group differences" in IQ propounded by Chuck).
you think Hispanics are too stupid to be proper US citizens.
you say "they" all stick together and vote alike, but Trump got 35% of the Hispanic vote and about 50% of Hispanics in Florida.
seems you don't have faith that Republicans can possibly win over new migrants. do you think it's because they're lazy and greedy?
Trump says he can end birthright citizenship with an executive order.
https://www.axios.com/trump-birthrig...1fd72ea82.html
This is the kind of stunt that everyone should just ignore. It is obviously a troll job and the media jumps on this and wastes a news cycle instead of talking about how the Repugs are stripping health care away from citizens.
we'll see
the both sidesism is astonishing. media heads are "questioning" whether the President can unilaterally change the US Cons ution.
idiotic. as you said, most come with no party affiliation to begin with and many central americans are not automatic shoe-ins for either party as they are aware of the contribution that both parties have made in regards to the state of the northern triangle of central america.
Trash, sworn to defend the Cons ution, dog whistles to his racist mob that he is racist-ly against anchor babies, birthright citizenship.
his racist bona fides affirmed , mission accomplished
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
