What’s your definition of Alpha? Because Tony is an Alpha. Have you seen highlights of prime Parker? He could ing score under trees. The guy was fearless. Directed then already champ Duncan and called him “Timmy”, a rookie and 19? Believe me, Tony’s an Alpha. You can’t be the general of four championships team if you’re not. Kawhi, however great a player he is, is NOT an alpha. He could not lead a team. Lowry is the vocal leader of the Raptors. Kawhi would always need a leader, not him, to lead. Being a cold assassin doesn’t make him an alpha. He lacks the leadership, the will to overcome insurmountable challenge. The guy doesn’t even have the balls to say “hey I don’t want it here.” He hides and let other people talk for him. That was not being an alpha. It takes more than scoring to be an alpha. It takes at ude to get him over the edge. Kawhi is a ing-good-player, but to me, he’s not an alpha.
If you’re making comparison, Demar’s game is neither of these two. Tony relied on speed, floaters and finishing under the rim. Kawhi was looking to score not pass. Demar is averaging 8 assist and moves like butter. The closest Spur comparison to me was Gervin, a smooooth scorer who worked in the mid-range, layups. He’ll pick his spot and score like Demar.
If you meant who’s the closer (not alpha). It’s Demar. Before it was more like Manu the way he could score in different ways and such a clutch and could get fouled and very good free throw shooter. Watch Spurs highlights, you would see it was mostly Ginobili. Peace