Reply With Quote
Bertans shooting is fine, though. It's the other facets that are lacking at the moment.
Semi hard-on tbh. Like 3/4 chub. We already have one underachieving shooter in Bertans though.
Bertans shooting is fine, though. It's the other facets that are lacking at the moment.
Don’t know what the back story is with Chriss, but he’s the exact 3 and D four we need in the starting lineup. And by D I just mean role not exactly ability. If I’m not mistaken he’s a decent shot blocker but I’m not sure how he is mobility wise on the perimeter. But I’d love to see him and Murray play together again. I’m gonna do some research....
stanley johnson out of the pistons rotation, should spurs try and trade for him?
Spurs have been linked with him twice (2017 & 2018 trade deadline).
He’s actually playing for detroit at Brooklyn. He was in the starting lineup.
I don't see who they would want from the Spurs in a trade considering Johnson is their starting 3. I assume they'll make a run at him in the offseason. He's an RFA and MLE money should be enough to get him. He's only 22 and I guess they think Chip can fix his jumpshot
dis kent
These former first round picks that don’t have option years picked up become UFAs right? As far as I understand it, they only become RFAs after their fourth year. Teams retain Bird or early Bird rights though?
Non-firsts are different - anytime in first three years similar to the Parsons situation.
As far as I know, your interpretation is correct. It's less clear as to what happens if such a player is waived and then signs a new contract with a team, though. Kendall Marshall was in line for RFA after being waived after one year and signing with LAL, but Jimmer was a UFA after being waived by SAC and signed with CHI. Regardless, the teams retain the right to go over the cap to sign those players, but they cannot sign the player to a contract starting at anything above the value of the option the team turned down.
Harrison waived by Grizzlies. He sucks, but makes sense as something of a Murray replacement and the type who'd pair well with either Forbes or Mills. He's huge, can provide some ball handling/play making, while being able to slide across three positions defensively.
I would be happy with Harrison, at least on a two-way. With the B2Bs starting, Pop is going to want to rest guys. Harrison isn't just depth for Forbes and Mills. He is depth for DeRozan and Beli.
Harrison played well enough against us in the playoffs a couple years back to be on PATFO's radar but I can only see him on a two way. Austin needs a guard and we need one on two way. Makes some sense I guess. I like his game tho.
Why not, every time i saw him he was bad or so-so but he could provide some size and maybe some D plus he's a capable playmaker.
Harrison looked good to Spurs fans because we got to see him go against Mills.
Some people here have been trying to trade for Chandler since the beginning of time
Chandler would have been an interesting player around the deadline if the Spurs moved Gasol/Poeltl in a deal for a star. He didn't seem to have a lot left in the tank last game, so he's not a huge loss. Still would have been nice to have the option if the team can find a good deal later in the year.
doesn't really do anything to move the needle with LA imo. Javale probably is a better player at this point in time. Chandler probably won't make the same bonehead plays McGee makes though. He only made sense for us tho if we moved Pau or Poeltl. I hope we intend to stay with a small ball four and move away from the traditional two big lineups.
This. Pau is our TOSB Chandler.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
