Watch the video. Post notes. You won't do it because you can't bring yourself to shame the Democrats like that. I mean, your disability check is not worth ing with at the end of the day.a second fake quote white flag.
I asked for you to show us the amount of money you pwomise will be saved.
Or just show us the cost savings from the last time.
Quit stalling.
I asked for you to show us the amount of money you pwomise will be saved.Watch the video. Post notes. You won't do it because you can't bring yourself to shame the Democrats like that. I mean, your disability check is not worth ing with at the end of the day.
Or just show us the cost savings from the last time.
Your answer is Tucker Carlson in a Prager U. video.
I won't watch a five minute video
I asked for you to show us the amount of money you pwomise will be saved.
Or just show us the cost savings from the last time.
If you can't prove your claim, just say so, derp.
You have never proved any of your claims in the past, so it's nothing new.
lol
I asked for you to show us the amount of money you pwomise will be saved.
Or just show us the cost savings from the last time.
If you can't prove your claim, just say so, derp.
You have never proved any of your claims in the past, so it's nothing new.
lol
The truth is the last time we committed this number of troops, the growth of the illegal population continued to rise unabated until the economic crash reduced it to the level where it remains today.
It was a waste of money under Bush and Obama.
Now Dennison wants to triple down as a midterm stunt.
lol derp
That is exactly what happened in 2006.
And
Sorry to burst your bubble.
That is exactly what happened in 2006.
And
Sorry to burst your bubble.
Sorry, it's the truth.
Feel free to show your numbers and correlations, derp.
Sorry, it's the truth.
Feel free to show your numbers and correlations, derp.
The other truth is that about 600,000 is added to the number of illegals here each year with zero border issues and nothing the troops could possibly prevent.
Feel free to show your numbers and correlations, derp.
You won't.
You'll just cry and whine.
I'm not planning on selling my home.
This is the entire point. If I was planning on selling, increasing the selling price would be desirable.
You're crying and whining, derp.
Feel free to show your numbers and correlations, derp.
You won't.
You'll just cry and whine.
I know you have no numbers and can't counter any argument I make with any facts or figures.
You can only cry and whine.
lol derp
The last deployment of this size did nothing to quell the growth of the illegal immigrant population and such deployments completely ignore the largest source of new illegal immigrants every year.
That's all.
^^^
OK, show your numbers.^^^
Prove your claims.
You seem to find that task impossible and fail to do it every time.
Amazon Plans to Split HQ2 Evenly Between Two Cities
https://www.wsj.com/articles/amazon-...d=hp_lead_pos1
Amazon is in advanced talks with multiple cities but hasn’t made a final decision on which two locations it will pick, according to people familiar with the matter. The Wall Street Journal on Sunday reported that Amazon was in late-stage discussions with Crystal City in Virginia, Dallas and New York City.
A decision and announcement could come as soon as this week, according to people familiar with the matter.
David Dayen: Amazon just scammed 236 cities by scraping their non-public information for free.
http://inthesetimes.com/article/2157...pe-cities-datathe biggest suckers on HQ2 aren’t New York and Virginia; it’s the other 236 cities that bid on a headquarters they were never going to get. Those bids didn’t just include the size of the bribe; they included a wealth of important data about plans for transportation, housing, education and workforce development. Amazon now has a treasure trove of non-public information about America’s future, in addition to knowing how much cash cities are willing to part with to land an Amazon facility. And it got all that, along with a giant PR benefit from the bidding war, for free.
If you knew a city was going to build a road in a particular place, you could make a lot of money buying up the real estate there. Imagine that on a national scale and you can see how Amazon will grow far wealthier from the data it collected than even the raw dollars extracted from HQ2’s big winners. In fact, this was the real reason Amazon orchestrated the whole charade.
Amazon can now go back to every city that put in a bid and offer a warehouse or data center or satellite office for one of its 16 subsidiary companies. The company will have significant leverage in those negotiations, because the other side has already made an initial offer. Just as important, Amazon can set up operations with the foreknowledge of what cities have divulged to them. It can build its convenience stores or bookseller outlets where cities have planned rapid development and population growth. It can locate its warehouses where a new highway expansion is imminent. It can shift knowledge jobs to areas where universities will soon be built and high-tech education projects funded.
It can even potentially sell this data to other companies who long for similar deals, or at least start up a new business line in negotiating deals between companies and municipal governments
Former Amazon employees squeal: Amazon uses retailer data to favor its own private label products.
Essentially, it's alleged that Amazon competes with the third party sellers it hosts.
https://thecapitolforum.com/wp-conte...2018.11.05.pdf
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
