Reply With Quote
Rodgers threw it into double coverage. Terrible playcall. Why not run or sneak? Great catch, though.
Pathetic life? I'll be laughing all the way to the bank this friday when I get >$5000 direct deposited into my bank account for the second time in three weeks...Keep crying Andrew. Your pathetic life won’t get any better even if Brady loses
Rodgers threw it into double coverage. Terrible playcall. Why not run or sneak? Great catch, though.
is that supposed to be a lot of money?
MVS... how did that dude fall to the 5th round? His measurables are similar to Megatron's, he runs great routes and has terrific hands... how the did he fall to the 5th round?
I guess in Baaawwwwston it isn't, but if you extrapolate that out, it's around 120-130k after taxes.
And the best part, it's all W2 money, not that sketchy stuff or drug money and .
Of course the luckiest team of all time lucks into a fluke turnover. Of course.
Packers love to give away Rodgers's W's.
i hate that er White and have for a long time
it's always some bull fluke fumble too
really frustrating. You knew it was an immediate Pats TD as soon as he fumbled. Seen this same game too many times
Damn fumble ended the game
GB would win NE in a neutral field SB; but it doesn't look like they're gonna get through that tough NFC.
might not even make the playoffs at this rate... sad
they're 3-4-1 after tonight and we assume the Vikings win the division... GB plays at minnesota which strongly favors minnesota.
so they have to get a wild card, but that tie pretty much functions as a loss in that regard... seattle and atlanta are ahead of them there... and the redskins assuming the eagles win the division. also, redskins have the tiebreaker over them. seattle tbh. And they still have to get over the bears which they should. But to get a playoff birth won't be easy for green bay at this rate
They likely get in at 9-6-1 and maybe even at 8-7-1.
And for what it's worth, that tie should've been a loss. At least it gives them a tiebreaker they wouldn't have had.
8-7-1 won't get a wild card. NFC is way too good for that. Panthers will win 11 and someone else will win 10. And there's no tiebreaker if they lose at Minnesota which is likely.
1) Saints 13-3
2) Rams 13-3
3) Vikings ??
4) NFC East champ ??
5) Panthers 11-5
6) ??
is how I'm seeing it
The tie is WC tiebreaker. Obviously, it's not likely GB will win the division. And 8 wins could be enough if these NFC teams beat up on each other enough and/or if a team or two goes into a slump. It's way too early to tell.
8 wins hasn't been enough to make a wild card in the stacked NFC all century. I think it happened once in the AFC. It's extremely rare. And the NFC is better than the AFC anyway. Though the AFC is better than usual this year.
I think one of the NFC East teams will break out. Winner of Eagles/Cowboys next weekend, tbh.
But yea, 9 or 10 wins is probably more likely to be the threshold.
GB losing to Detroit will ultimately kill them. Detroit may not clear more than 5 wins this year because of their schedule and the bloodbath of a division
stop putting this fudge packers team on tv. they haven't been good in years tbh
I think we should all refer to Carolina as "#5 Seed" until Breesus retires, because that's their fate every year tbh
That's gotta be disappointing for the Packers Defense.
They did have more sacks, held Brady to the longest incompletion streak of his career but their QB is 2-7 in the 4th
Even Burtles threw for 5TD against the Patriots defense...
have to agree somewhat with this. they're great at beating up/putting up epic comebacks on bad teams (especially at home), but they've pretty much the bed against good teams ever since 2012 or so. Pretty predictable team imho
i'm sure godgers fans will find a way to reframe this loss..
*one post later*Here comes a gui ude meltdown after that roughing the punter call
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
