I don't particularly care, tbh... I want some show...
this is some zen buddhism level wisdom. deep man deep
I don't particularly care, tbh... I want some show...
Yeah it's simple advice but he's posting on a political forum about how politics irritates him.
How many Hispanics said "que chengos pinche 'Orourke'?"
Only about 16% of registered Hispanics actually voted last time. Most of the Hispanics I know prefer to remain off the radar.
Ive been receiving daily text messages from Democrats
When I spent a night in Anaheim, their local TV ads were non stop politics
It's actually "chingados" instead of "chengos", .
Okay, so Hispanics tend to be less likely to vote, which would seem to imply the 16% who do vote are more politically aware. You think those people don't know what Beto's last name is? Or what (R) and (D) mean?
non sequitur
Just got done voting, wrote in Hillary for every race.
time to change you # nig
I asked how dumb you think Hispanic voters are, you came back with the Hispanic voting rate.
How dumb do you think Hispanic voters are?
Im on d way niga. Voting all blue
Just blazed one so hopefully I can operate the machine succesfully![]()
So mine was a paper ballot
hole country![]()
If the wait is really like 15 minutes or less in Atlanta and the media in an effort to dramatize things and get ratings/headlines is telling people its going to be 3 hours a lot of people are going to stay home. Lmao dumbasses
I asked "how many" and you then offered a non sequitur that lower percentage turnout indicates more intelligent voters.
So your question begs the question. I think people in general are dumb, and it's not necessarily race specific.
I canceled Boutons vote last week.
That's not a non sequitur. If one is a voting member of a non-voting subset of people, it stands to reason he is more informed. It may not be the case for every one of them, but it's a logical conclusion for the whole. It's a stretch to think many such people aren't going to know that "O'Rourke" = "Beto."
An example of a non sequitur would be giving an anecdote about Hispanic non-voters when asked a question about Hispanic voters, because what do Hispanics preferring to be off the radar have to do with the intelligence of a Hispanic voter?
1st, I've seen no studies that suggest voters are more informed than non-voters. 2nd, a subset of registered voters (let's not move the goalpost here) aren't necessarily more informed than the rest of the group. So yes, it is a non sequitur to suggest that those who voted are more informed than those who registered and did not vote. It might be wishful thinking but that's all it is. I suppose you've never heard the term "low information voter".
It's not a logical conclusion. Saying it more often doesn't make it more true.It may not be the case for every one of them, but it's a logical conclusion for the whole. It's a stretch to think many such people aren't going to know that "O'Rourke" = "Beto."
I am the one who asked the question and you're the one who offered the non sequitur. Try to stick to that. What happened after you left the road isn't relevant.An example of a non sequitur would be giving an anecdote about Hispanic non-voters when asked a question about Hispanic voters, because what do Hispanics preferring to be off the radar have to do with the intelligence of a Hispanic voter?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)