Jim Acosta Out!

[Spurtacular]

"physically controlling"
Today's derp fantasies.

Acosta put a hand to the woman in order to keep the microphone for which it was her job to obtain. You are in favor of that, sociopath chump.

[Pavlov]

Acosta put a hand to the woman in order to keep the microphone for which it was her job to obtain. You are in favor of that, sociopath chump.

why do you keep changing your terms?

You said Acosta assaulted a woman with a traumatic karate chop.

Own it.

I don't think interns should be put in that situation. Send an armed guard if you think it's that dangerous, derp.

[Spurtacular]

why do you keep changing your terms?

You said Acosta assaulted a woman with a traumatic karate chop.

Own it.

I don't think interns should be put in that situation. Send an armed guard if you think it's that dangerous, derp.

Objecting to terms and then crying when I do my best to make them innocuous (because it doesn't give you the easy out you're looking for).
Re karate chop: Trying to go back to prior debates to run.

Here is your current position: It is okay for a man to physically handle a woman in the work place.

[Pavlov]

Objecting to terms and then crying when I do my best to make them innocuous (because it doesn't give you the easy out you're looking for).

why try to make them innocuous?

Re karate chop: Trying to go back to prior debates to run.

you never rescinded your characterization.

Here is your current position: It is okay for a man to physically handle a woman in the work place.

Nope.

Your current position is that Acosta physically assaulted a woman with a criminal traumatic karate chop.

Own it.

[Spurtacular]

Your current position is that Acosta physically assaulted a woman with a criminal traumatic karate chop.

Own it.

I did, sociopath.

[Spurtacular]

I don't think interns should be put in that situation. Send an armed guard if you think it's that dangerous, derp.

That's not how it works, sociopath.
Sociopath pretending professional decorum (not to mention abiding laws) is not a thing.

[Pavlov]

I did, sociopath.

"I do my best to make them innocuous."

That is running away from it, derp.

lol

[Pavlov]

That's not how it works, sociopath.
Sociopath pretending professional decorum (not to mention abiding laws) is not a thing.

Decorum would have Trump answering simple questions. Lord knows you can't do that.

What law was broken, derp?

[Spurtacular]

"I do my best to make them innocuous."

That is running away from it, derp.

lol

I owned my position. Regardless, you're having a hard time reconciling yourself with the fact that your position is that Acosta is allowed to manhandle women (according to your current stance).

Sociopath Chump

[Spurtacular]

What law was broken, derp?

:Cry Let's rehash this. I need to run.

[Spurtacular]

Decorum would have Trump answering simple questions. Lord knows you can't do that.

Trying to rely on moral relativism.
Desperate sociopath

[Pavlov]

I owned my position

no

manhandle

there you go again.

[Pavlov]

Trying to rely on moral relativism.

there's nothing moral about decorum.

[Spurtacular]

no
there you go again.

no
there you go again.

Bitter mumbles won't erase your current advocating of manhandling women in the workplace.

[Pavlov]

Bitter mumbles won't erase your current advocating of manhandling women in the workplace.

You mean "avocationing."


Why wasn't Acosta arrested, derp?

[Spurtacular]

You mean "avocationing."

I mean you're okay with Acosta physically handling women in the workplace and on the national stage at that.

[Pavlov]

I mean you're okay with Acosta physically handling women in the workplace and on the national stage at that.

You keep changing your terms.

Can't own any of it.

Why wasn't Acosta arrested, derp?

[Spurtacular]

You keep changing your terms.

Can't own any of it.

Why wasn't Acosta arrested, derp?

You spinning all over. You're okay with Acosta physically handling women in the workplace and on the national stage at that. You can't refute that.

[Pavlov]

You spinning all over. You're okay with Acosta physically handling women in the workplace and on the national stage at that. You can't refute that.

Define "handling."

Did he pick up and throw her somewhere?

[Spurtacular]

Define "handling."

I said physically handling. That's pretty straight forward. Do you want me to define 'is' next?

Sociopath Chump

[Pavlov]

I said physically handling.

But what does that mean, derp?

[Spurtacular]

But what does that mean, derp?

He put hand(s) to her (and controlled her in this instance).

[Pavlov]

He put hand(s) to her (and controlled her in this instance).

How could he put two hands "to" her if he's holding the mic on one?

And who has ever put hands "to" anyone else?

you haven't even seen the video!

[Spurtacular]

How could he put two hands "to" her if he's holding the mic on one?

And who has ever put hands "to" anyone else?

you haven't even seen the video!

Geez, you're ing desperate.

Acosta physically handled the woman to prevent the woman from taking the microphone. This isn't hard. You're only looking for cheap semantics to pretend that's not the case.

[Pavlov]

Geez, you're ing desperate.

Acosta physically handled the woman to prevent the woman from taking the microphone. This isn't hard. You're only looking for cheap semantics to pretend that's not the case.

"physically handled"

He shouldn't have done what he did but there is no way an intern should've been sent out to do that. Just cut off the mic feed. Simple, but everyone wants the drama -- especially you.

He should've just held the mic up and made her jump for it.

And it wasn't assault.

And you'll never answer why Acosta wasn't arrested.