now you're acting like she was kidnapped.
You don't give a about women so don't start now.
I already said he shouldn't have done what he did.
Where did you get your legal education you keep bragging about?
Running....
Acosta physically handled the woman against her will. You have not said that that is not okay.
now you're acting like she was kidnapped.
You don't give a about women so don't start now.
I already said he shouldn't have done what he did.
Where did you get your legal education you keep bragging about?
All that lashing out cos you have no defense for Jimmy.
"Shouldn't have done what he did" makes it sound advisory rather a matter of right/wrong.
no
I can't prevent you from making a re ed inference.
Is physically handling a woman against her will a terminable offense?
What Acosta did is not, but good idea for you to move the goalpost.
again with the dramatic terms.
No goalpost moving. This is a simple progression.
Is physically handling a woman against her will a terminable offense?
I already said what Acosta did is not.
you moved the goalpost from muh Law 100 criminal assault prosecution to workplace policy.
Sociopath conveniently not finishing sentences properly (and with clarity). Par.
Is physically handling a woman against her will a terminable offense?
Yes or no.
I already said what Acosta did is not a terminable offense.
What part of that do you not understand?
Second time in a short time you said you "already" said something when you didn't.
Today's sociopath
I can't understand sentences for you, derp.![]()
I didn't ask you to make a specific evaluation of the Acosta incident. Sociopath still trying to be slick.
I asked, is physically handling a woman against her will a terminable offense?
Yes or no.
You'd have to describe every possible scenario and take it up with every HR department and manager in the world, derp.
Then you'll have your answer.
Get to it, slick.
So, you're saying that it can be a terminable offense but that there are exceptions to the rule? Tell us about some of these exceptions.
I'm saying every workplace and situation is different. We're talking about Acosta. You can't understand that and now you want your hand to be held and go into the weeds.![]()
Explain how physically handling a woman is not a terminable offense. What makes Jimmy have this privilege apparently?
Because it's not what you're breathlessly trying to make it out to be, derp.
You're a snowflake and this isn't a big deal.
Sorry to ruin your dreams.
Ah. It's not a big deal for Acosta to physically handle a woman against her will you say. Got it![]()
I think chump has already agreed acosta acted inappropriately and the White House had grounds to pull his press pass.
Describe the "physical handling."
You can't even say he put a hand on her. How can you physically handle someone you don't even put a hand on, derp?
He forcefully repelled her to prevent her from doing her job. You say that this is not a terminable offense for some reason. You are okay with violence towards women as long as it doesn't meet a certain threshold.
Not that I recall.
buzzwords.
He moved his hand down which had he effect of moving her hand further down on the hand in which he held the mic.
"violence"
You're a dainty, girly little snowflake.
Chump has already agreed Acosta crossed the line. You guys have just spent all day arguing the physical level.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)