All he has to do is say what he has been right about and it’s doubled. Simple. Two things.
Sounds like a good bet then. Take it. I dare you.
All he has to do is say what he has been right about and it’s doubled. Simple. Two things.
DMC called it.
The only one having trouble answering the question is your ass.
Do you accept the new bet terms? Yes or no.
Only children think all military men went through some HS bull course.
Want to bet on the fat thing? Surely you'll take that one.
Why would you want such a irrelevant caveat to a sure bet unless you want a backdoor to sneak out of?
I think he was being used as one, yes.
You think he's a western agent because his lawyer says so.
OK.
You were laughably wrong about pizzagate and Q anon martial law. If I'm wrong about this, OK.
It’s really an easy caveat.
You can’t name ANYTHING you have been right about?
It's your on ramp to changing the direction of the conversation. You want to nitpick each item to get away from this embarrassment you're facing now.
You can just say no if you don’t want/can’t afford the new bet terms. Are we good with the new terms? Yes or no.
You can’t even name who authorized the Uranium. You thought it was Hillaryn
It’s really an easy question. You don’t to talk about you being wrong. Because you’re a pussy. So when you are wrong again, you will shy away from it like the little stain you are. The bet stays.
lol muh bets
lol Hillary sold Putin uranium
So is the FIRST question I asked that you continue to dodge. Do you accept the new terms? Yes or no.
Forum mosquito buzzing around every conversation hoping to parasite some blood ^
Don’t want to talk about your claim eh?
lol you just described yourself, DMC.
The first take you've ever had here was that Hillary sold Putin uranium and your ass is still sore about it.
Yes, two pages back before you shifted the topic![]()
Sad. A grown ass man.![]()
I know Hillary didn't sell Putin uranium.
Do you know that?
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)