You're claiming to know it. Burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim (you).
![]()
You're claiming to know it. Burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim (you).
![]()
Actually the burden is on you to prove your assertion.
The owners of Uranium One sold Uranium One.
There. I proved it.
Prove it.
Only a broke like yourself thinks the other party is betting because they need money.
Only a broke keeps begging for people to take message board bets.
Extra pissy at the suggestion you have no money eh?
Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s Canadian founder.
Yeah, we went over this all over a year ago when TSA was pushing conspiracy theory.
From your snopes article you failed to link:
The Uranium One Deal Was Not Clinton’s to Veto or Approve
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hi...m-russia-deal/
lol DerpMC
Prove it.
I think I proved my point already Skeeter.
I’m not the one running from doubling the bet. You bit off more than you can chew. Deal with it and move on or keep exposing your lack of confidence and funds.
Lol no.
white flag
lol DerpMC
Literally begging for a bet.![]()
We already have a bet dip . Literally running from an offer to double your winnings.
broke
no confidence
you weren’t this desperate when you were pushing the book of Q. Guess you owe some money
It’s funny you think the Uranium One is done being investigated, especially knowing the hardon Whitaker had for the Clinton’s corruption.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...e-deal-n831436
You’ve already passed up the opportunity to double your money. I’ve moved past the offer and am now just laughing at your no confidence having broke ass pass on it.
LOL, djohn afraid of TSA.
Dec. 21, 2017
What charges are you predicting against Clinton almost a year after bookmarking this story, TSA?
Be specific.
Biased witness testimony
"never had veto power"
"all nine federal agencies were required to approve.."
Not approving = same as veto
Already have a bet head![]()
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)