Point of order, my question came first.
Why would a purported CIA employee such as Bush make it a point to contact the FBI directly? He would have obviously been connected to just pass any info along through his own channels. What say you, sociopath chump?
My request for your conspiracy theory came before that.
Since that made you yourself, I'm calling you out on this point.
I am challenging your claim.
Post your evidence he was a employed by the CIA while running for the US Senate.
It's your claim.
Back it up or shut yourself down.
And I told you that I will gladly slap you systematically if you want to discuss the highly su ious behavior of GWHB as it relates to JFK...
Why would a purported CIA employee such as Bush make it a point to contact the FBI directly? He would have obviously been connected to just pass any info along through his own channels. What say you, sociopath chump?
Seems you can't do anything when challenged.
I call bull .
Post your evidence he was a employed by the CIA while running for the US Senate.
It's your claim.
You can't proceed until you back it up.
Lol derp getting after anyone else for not doing "the grown-up thing"
Lol "highly su ious".
There is no way that derp is not also a 9/11 twoofer
Answer the question, sir. Quit stalling.
Why would a purported CIA asset (employee) such as Bush make it a point to contact the FBI directly? He would have obviously been connected to just pass any info along through his own channels. What say you, sociopath chump?
Show your evidence Bush was a CIA asset (employee).
I reject this premise.
I call bull .
You have to prove he was a CIA asset (employee) before proceeding.
If you have no evidence, just say so.
Your rejection of the premise has been stated many times now. You can still answer it as a qualified hypothetical according to your stated p.o.v.
Nope. There is no reason to go any further if you have no evidence Bush was a CIA asset (employee).
Do you have evidence Bush was a CIA asset (employee) during his US Senate run in 1963?
Yes or no.
You beg and beg and beg for the evidence and then shut down when the hits the fan.
The only way would hit the fan is if you have evidence Bush was a CIA asset (employee) during his US Senate run in 1963.
Do you have evidence Bush was a CIA asset (employee) during his US Senate run in 1963?
Yes or no.
It's a very simple question.
You see the writing on the wall. You're shutting down.
Actually you've shut down.
I am perfectly willing to continue with you down this rabbit hole if you have any evidence Bush was a CIA asset (employee) during his US Senate run in 1963.
Do you have any evidence Bush was a CIA asset (employee) during his US Senate run in 1963?
Yes or no.
If yes, post that evidence.
If no, lol derp.
Let's see your answer.
If you want my case, then stop shutting down. You've been asked a simple question. You've been allowed to qualify it as a hypothetical, and yet you're still shutting down. This shows you're afraid of the answer.
Nope, there is no reason to continue if you have no evidence Bush was a CIA asset (employee) during his US Senate run in 1963.
I will allow no hypotheticals.
I will allow you to back up your claim with evidence.
Do you have any evidence Bush was a CIA asset (employee) during his US Senate run in 1963?
Yes or no.
Just answer the question.
I might; but you answering a question doesn't hinge on that. You can be scared of a hypothetical question though; it suits you.
Nope, either you do or you don't.
Do you have any evidence Bush was a CIA asset (employee) during his US Senate run in 1963?
Yes or no.
Just answer the question.
Yup, I either do or don't. I'm going to progress through my case accordingly. Stop being scared of the question if you want "the conspiracy theory".
You have no evidence Bush was a CIA asset (employee) during his US Senate run in 1963.
I'm going to progress accordingly.
lol derp
You've said this many times, rain man. Now why would a CIA guy go to the FBI and not through his own channels? You tapping out?
He wasn't a CIA guy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote