Reply With Quote
More color commentary vs substance from the forum troglodyte.
Sorry you agreed with me and got angry about it, DMC.
Gotta be tough for you.
More color commentary vs substance from the forum troglodyte.
Perfect description.
hypocrisy to boot.
lol DMC
More color commentary vs substance from the forum troglodyte.
lol DMC
Petty provocation
lol DMC
"I'm a victim"
I never said I was a victim.
I said you are obsessed with posters' personal information.
lol DMC's nonstop narrative creation
lol sorry if i confused the issue
i was being facetious - of course mueller does not have carte blanche
but from all the evidence implicating pence i was pretty much joking that mueller might as well have cb when it comes to pence
because pence is in deep!
Comey
Spoke with Comey about what?
I asked for the evidence. This is where all of this started. Instead of evidence all I got was that he hired a lawyer and that he "begged" for an interview.
What Pence said in public cannot be considered perjury. He would have to lie under oath, so comparing notes between a talk show comment and a testimony is pointless. The commentary on a talk show might be enough to raise su ion, but I don't think prosecutors could use that against him in a perjury case.
I never said you claimed to be a victim. You sure seem defensive though, even going into 3rd person off and on. Are you off your meds?
You're one to talk about being sensitive... you had at least 3 people banned for trolling you.
Andrew C. McCarthy: Why Trump is likely to be indicted by Manhattan US Attorney
The point for this day is that the Cohen case in New York City is not about Cohen.
The president is in peril of being charged.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/andrew-c-mccarthy-why-trump-is-likely-to-be-indicted-by-manhattan-us-attorney
About the emails...
Duh.
Fox News good now
You said it yourself - ^
Mueller can use that as a reason to investigate Pence.
Why was pence lying? Why was he denying he knew anything about Flynn speaking to AND accepting money from foreign governments?
Well - good question.
Need more evidence;
Congress - IN WRITING - advised Pence (who was the HEAD of the Trump transition team) that Flynn had accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars from Turkey.
Yet - Pence solemnly denied that he had
"any knowledge of Flynn accepting anything from foreign gov'ts"
Mueller has all he needs to investigate Pence.
The most troublesome element of the Q and A between Gowdy and Comey was the fact that, at one point, Comey was talking to himself according to the transcriber.
Seriously though, the bias between Peter Strozk and Lisa Page is a bigger issue, to me, than anything else Comey is being questioned about. Even though Strozk was removed from the investigation, there's at least enough credible, damning evidence to illustrate a concerted effort to turn a blind eye to Hillary's transgressions. The Lynch/Clinton meeting wasn't good either, but no one can prove what was said and I disagree with Comey about the fact of the meeting being more important than what was said, especially right after he said there's no way of knowing what was said. If the prosecution (assuming there was one) focused only on the fact of the meeting, they would rely too heavily on the appearance of conspiracy while knowing the conversation would either prove it or disprove it.
Either way, there's some shady going on on both sides. Probably has been since George Washington led, but knowing about it leaves me nauseous.
Talk about a nothing-burger -Strock/PageThe most troublesome element of the Q and A between Gowdy and Comey was the fact that, at one point, Comey was talking to himself according to the transcriber.
Seriously though, the bias between Peter Strozk and Lisa Page is a bigger issue, to me, than anything else Comey is being questioned about. Even though Strozk was removed from the investigation, there's at least enough credible, damning evidence to illustrate a concerted effort to turn a blind eye to Hillary's transgressions. The Lynch/Clinton meeting wasn't good either, but no one can prove what was said and I disagree with Comey about the fact of the meeting being more important than what was said, especially right after he said there's no way of knowing what was said. If the prosecution (assuming there was one) focused only on the fact of the meeting, they would rely too heavily on the appearance of conspiracy while knowing the conversation would either prove it or disprove it.
Either way, there's some shady going on on both sides. Probably has been since George Washington led, but knowing about it leaves me nauseous.
c'mon - THIS bothers you?
Not lying, tax fraud, pros utes, conspiracy to defraud, moscow tower bribes, emoluments clause ery - where trump is getting millions or billions from saudi or russia?
The HORROR
is strock/page talking about trump!
I talked about trump when he was a candidate. I said he was a piece of criminal. Half the ing country knew he was a lying pos criminal.
Strock - KNEW - that the FBI had opened an investigation of 4 of Trumps team members BEFORE the election - but he said nothing?
He surely could have helped HRC - but he didn't - why?
Because he was just an FBI professional who got caught texting stupid texts - he still did his job.
He also ASSISTED COMEY - in writing the letter that would reopen the HRC EMAIL - investigation yet again - and cost Hillary the election.
Why would he ever assist in drafting that letter and NOT tell anyone - NOT leak anything about Trump team being investigated for russia contacts?
The HORROR that Strock/Page (rightfully) thought that Trump was a piece of who should not be allowed to be president.
Still - after having said all that = MUELLER KICKED THEM OFF THE TEAM IMMEDIATELY.
nothing-burger
Funny how Comey has perfect memory for his book, but can't recall ANYTHING when he is being questioned.The most troublesome element of the Q and A between Gowdy and Comey was the fact that, at one point, Comey was talking to himself according to the transcriber.
Oh, why did you use the word in a reply to me, DMC?
Explain.
I have never complained to anyone about any trolling.You're one to talk about being sensitive... you had at least 3 people banned for trolling you.
lol DMC's narratives
No one said he couldn't. There's a reason he hasn't and that is likely because the evidence hasn't led him there. It's counter-intuitive to think Mueller would have the goods on Pence and ignore it. So Pence getting a lawyer or publicly stating he would interview doesn't indicate guilt to Mueller. Hopefully he has a stronger sense of what cons utes "evidence" than some wishcasters here have.
There's no legal ramifications to lying to the public. Regardless of his reasons, legally he's safe and I doubt Mueller relies on that to make a case about it.Why was pence lying? Why was he denying he knew anything about Flynn speaking to AND accepting money from foreign governments?
Didn't deny it under oath.Well - good question.
Need more evidence;
Congress - IN WRITING - advised Pence (who was the HEAD of the Trump transition team) that Flynn had accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars from Turkey.
Yet - Pence solemnly denied that he had
Then why hasn't he?"any knowledge of Flynn accepting anything from foreign gov'ts"
Mueller has all he needs to investigate Pence.
Because I wanted to. Are you confused?
SureI have never complained to anyone about any trolling.
lol DMC's narratives
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)
Posting Permissions