Reply With Quote
I generally wait for all the evidence to come in before I offer an opinion. You have no such limitations.
What's your take on Mueller suppressing evidence, and why is he so scared to produce the original 302?
I generally wait for all the evidence to come in before I offer an opinion. You have no such limitations.
Close reading in retrospect of the Steele dossier at Lawfare:
https://www.lawfareblog.com/steele-d...-retrospective
I won't read it then either.
When’s the last time you had one?
Probably locked away in those illegal servers
Good thing Comey said it was salacious and unverified. Pretty much puts to bed all of that Russia nonsense. Interesting read if you just joined the conversation.
dodgerjohn has no take. On anything. Zilch. Nada.
What’s on a 302 Chris?
Any news on Flynn charges being dropped today?
Box scores.
Lots of news on Flynn's charges being dropped today. I'm guessing you decided not to read anything posted above?
So nothing on Flynn’s charge being dropped.
If you did read you read without comprehension or you're lying about what you read. my money's on didn't read it.
The article says the dossier is partly corroborated by the course of the Mueller investigation and that nothing in it so far has been disproven.
"Has held up pretty well" is their summation.
Propaganda Chris can't tell a straight tale.
Oh yeah? I can't find it. Give me a post #.
I did, thanks for sharing.
Typical "you didn't read it" bull from Winetroll23. Pavlov would be proud.
Your gloss of the article is completely implausible. You either didn't read it or didn't understand it. Hard to see another option here.
Ken White loads the blunderbuss against fair weather friends of criminal defense, right and left.
Mr. White does not argue that Flynn was entrapped or that the FBI broke the law, but essentially that the law is unfair to targets and unduly deferential to LEOs -- that it screwed Mike Flynn, as it is designed to do in any case.
It's a defense lawyer's angle, that power creates its own justifications and does wrong to whomever is so unlucky or unwary as to enter its crosshairs. I have a lot of sympathy for this view.
Flynn to
why the sympathy for Flynn when cops kill 10s, 100s of black every years, Ms of black railroaded into prison.
Flynn, 'im and all his traitorous connections with Russians.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 12-15-2018 at 02:26 AM.
Mix him with Boutons.. Boutyhole
lol
Yeah this bulls hit view. A military man did not know not to lie to the FBI? And by the ing way. If you are a subject to any federal investigation they likely know when you are lying and know it ahead of time. So why lie? Especially in Flynn’s case when he knew that they already knew the answers. So why would he continue to lie?
Last edited by djohn2oo8; 12-15-2018 at 08:23 AM.
You also also have sympathy for Julian Assange.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
