Reply With Quote
More bull glibness from DMC...when were they good?
Hillary cleared. Not Trump.
More bull glibness from DMC...when were they good?
On a flight, nothing else to do. Echo chamber posting ain't my thing.
conspiracy and treason good now
US Allies. Opposed war in Iraq.
Treason!
Actually it is. You're just using a different chamber.
Regurgitating pro-Trump talking points is your thing.
That makes no sense.
How Terrible a Lawyer is Rudy?
the Trump Tower Moscow deal that apparently remained live through the 2016 election.
The last time Giuliani admitted a fact that was not publicly known, it was to get ahead of the Stormy Daniels story before it was disclosed in a likely indictment of Cohen.
It seems safe to assume that
he is revealing the fact that Trump was negotiating the Trump Tower Moscow deal/bribe in the closing days of the election for the same reason.
Cohen’s office was raided on April 9th and not coincidentally, Giuliani announced as Trump’s new lawyer on April 19th.
Looks to me like Giuliani is trying to construct a firewall here.
Admitting the fact that the negotiations were taking place right up to the election so that he can deny the evidence that they continued after Trump won.
Also significant is the obvious lie that the Moscow Tower deal was known about.
Like the Trump Tower meeting it was vociferously denied both before the election and after the inaugural.
It seems clear that in private discussions
Trump’s team has a running conversation about a very damaging set of facts,
an effort to conceal a lot of those facts but also a parallel effort to stand up legal theories that those facts don’t equate to crimes.
In Giuliani’s partial defense, the facts appear to be really, really, really bad and
the relentlessness of the Mueller probe is making it extremely difficult to keep them secret.
So standing up defenses on the law is both necessary and inevitable, as far-fetched as they may be.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/how-terrible-a-lawyer-is-rudy
Filed FARA ex-post, like I said.
What do you think about NATSEC advisors in the employ of foreign governments?
Is that new?
You need to go back and check the history all the way up until now. Dumb
Of course it does.
You're white-knighting with your "the press were mean to Trump" counter to Russian interference in the US election.
THAT makes no sense, chirpy.
What are your other examples of such employment?
Let's see them.
Lol his Turkey comment.
So there are people here echoing that? If not, you don't understand what the term means.
I am asking
March 10, 2017
WASHINGTON — The candidate he was advising last fall was running on a platform of America First. The client he was working for last fall was paying him more than $500,000 to put Turkey first.
Michael T. Flynn, who went from the campaign trail to the White House as President Trump’s first national security adviser, filed papers this week acknowledging that he worked as a foreign agent last year representing the interests of the Turkish government in a dispute with the United States.
Almost 2 years old
lol this is the only echo chamber that exists in the world?
Stick to chirping.
Before Erdogan when they were secular and not some Islamic hole.
Yeah this was after he was fired. DMC with another dumbass chirp
None that I know of.
Do you think there are?
There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 11 guests)
Posting Permissions
