Reply With Quote
how's that?
lmao Mueller grabbed Nunes by the pussy
how's that?
Nunes, the same Uber cowboy running interference for Trump who blocked subpoenas of Stone, and other witnesses now all of a sudden votes to give info to Mueller
why would Congress refuse such a request?
if they had refused you'd accuse them of carrying water for DJT and covering up lies.
in your mind they're either pussies or corrupt, with no third option -- no pat on the fanny for doing the right thing.
they have been refusing to subpoena witnesses, do ents and refusing to compel trump team to answer questions for two years now
nunes has also run to the white house and informed trump on evidence against him
disgraceful
However that may be, whoever's in the majority gets to run the House inquiry how they like.
I won't disagree that Nunes is a contemptible weasel, but that hardly distinguishes him from his peers.
One of the things that causes posters like you and djohn to lose credibility is your apparent unwillingness to credit Republicans for their good deeds.
I never denied giving credit - good that they agreed to release Stone's transcript -
NOT good that the DEMS had been begging for months and months for this to be done and were denied.
They asked for ALL the transcripts to be released - Trump jr, Bannon, hope hicks etc... and they were denied.
When Bannon and the rest came to testify and were asked a question they refused to answer and were asked why. They said the white house requested them to refuse to answer.
The dems asked the Repubs to compel them to testify or be held in contempt - they refused.
The dems stated that they felt several witnesses might have perjured themselves and asked the majority to subpoena them to come and clarify their answers - and were denied.
This travesty went on for two years and now the Repubs see they can refuse - and then two weeks from now - the Dems will release anyway - so the Repugs suddenly go along? This deserves credit?
Ok, thanks very much Repugs - nice looking out for the country!
Elections have consequences, now the Dems will have their own turn at selective disclosure.
This kind of thinking is really harmful IMO.
How did we get to a place where obstructing justice, defending suspects and even covering their crimes is just a matter of R vs. D?
How is it that you can even think for a second that if a party wins an election they can just become "criminals during our majority term?"
How does one arrive at this thinking?
Now that the Dems are in control of the house - do you think for one second that I would support them if they suddenly started obstructing investigations of criminal wrong doing?
Do you think I would applaud them and support them if they suddenly found out that a Dem committed crimes - or was suspected of that - and then they began to defend his crimes?
SMH
Robert Mueller Just Dropped A Major Clue That He’s Heading Straight For Donald Trump Jr.
According to The Washington Post, the special counsel has asked the House Intelligence Committee for a transcript of former Trump adviser Roger Stone’s testimony.
The report notes, “Securing an official transcript from the committee would be a necessary step before pursuing an indictment that Stone allegedly lied to lawmakers, legal experts said.”
While this is a sign that Mueller could be on the verge of indicting Stone,
it could also spell doom for Donald Trump Jr. as the special counsel is looking into whether the president’s aides and family members lied to Congress during their testimony.
During a discussion on MSNBC, David Corn, Mother Jones Washington bureau chief, pointed out why the president’s eldest son should be concerned.
https://www.politicususa.com/2018/12...ue-don-jr.html
Roger stone requested they be released
https://www.scribd.com/do ent/3960...script-release
And Mueller requested them. Which means he believes Stone lies.
TSA. You okay with this?
[QUOTE]At the same time the requests were being made, Treasury officials were using their government email accounts to send messages back and forth with a network of private Hotmail and Gmail accounts set up by the Russians, rather than communicating through the secure network usually used to exchange information with other countries.
Analysts at an elite agency within Treasury first warned supervisors in 2016 that the Russians were “manipulating the system” to conduct “fishing expeditions.” And they raised fears that the Treasury’s internal systems could be compromised by viruses contained in emails from the unofficial Russian accounts. But staff continued using the Gmail back channel into 2017, despite repeated internal warnings that Russia could be trawling for sensitive financial records — including Social Security and bank account numbers — to spy on, endanger, or recruit targets in the West.
The Treasury Department refused to tell BuzzFeed News why its officials were communicating with unofficial Gmail accounts at the same time that Russia was sending the su ious requests, or to say whether it eventually turned over any do ents in response. Nor would officials answer any other specific questions about the matter. [/QUOTE] very bad op-sec, and what a coincidence!
Mueller’s probe to remain under Rosenstein’s supervision
AG Whitaker in charge of oversight on Mueller.
Flynn repeatedly admitted to repeatedly lying to the feds.
No one can spin that.
lol Madcow
Chris didn't read the article; doing the troll thing.
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)
Posting Permissions
