"..but giving up Danny Green was too much."

[Amuseddaysleeper]

Am i? Hey but that 1 steal!! And -20 sheesh

He was injured a majority of last season

[Mugen]

So no mention of Kawhi and LMA shooting like as opposed to Demar/LMA going off last night? Not to mention the Spurs PG last night didn't waddle around the court to a tune of 4 points

[Chinook]

Am i? Hey but that 1 steal!! And -20 sheesh

Hit half his threes and you're complaining?

[look_at_g_shred]

Hit half his threes and you're complaining?

Look back at my point that you disagreed with. I was right.

[superbigtime]

Please explain how giving cash in trade impacts anything on the court.

It doesn't. Never said otherwise.

[Chinook]

Look back at my point that you disagreed with. I was right.

You're comparing a game last year where everyone played poorly (one of those games where Kawhi "gave it a go" and messed up the flow of the offense) to say the same would happen this year, even though the team has a more active Aldridge and a healthy DeRozan instead of a hobbled and disgruntled Leonard. Doesn't make sense. Green shot reasonably well in that game

[HarlemHeat37]

I don't think anybody would deny that Green was horrendous last year.. I'm one of his biggest fans here, but it was a good idea for the Spurs to move on from him(although I don't think they should have just gave him away), he didn't fit well with Aldridge-ball and the lack of playmaking options..

I think he would have been much better with White and DeRozan around him, though..replace Belinelli with Green and this team would be even better(that wasn't the trade-off that actually occurred, but just using it as an example)..

Regardless, it doesn't matter, the Spurs are playing like an elite team and Green is doing much better in Toronto, worked out for both parties..

[kaji157]

Aside from the discussion of it's a good or bad trade. Danny was a little comfortable here, and also Pop was with him. The change is fitting both.