Reply With Quote
lmao "i got the wrong information", nah her employer got the wrong info from her claiming she was an actual journalist or whatever the her dumbass is.
lmao "i got the wrong information", nah her employer got the wrong info from her claiming she was an actual journalist or whatever the her dumbass is.
CNN
Just another bull overused term tbh. Mostly used to dismiss the perspective of others and shutdown conversation.
Similarly based on bull like this you'll have people acting as black men are better off than black women because they have determined that men have privilege and women don't. Meanwhile the new York times has a graphic showing that poor black women aquire wealth on the exact same pace as white women. So much for the privilege of color and gender. Meanwhile you can find articles calling black men the white people of black people.
You're so persecuted.
Maybe you should avoid things that make you this angry. There are so many things on the internet to entertain yourself.
Why do you choose to seek out stuff that you can't emotionally handle? Are you a masochist?
Pretty clearly pointed out how the nonsense hurts black men in that paragraph.
Nice try though.
Lol, no one is offended. We are laughing at how stupid this is.
I don't see anything describing how, tangibly, this "nonsense" hurts black men. I see you ranting about articles you don't like.
Is Spurminator really this dumb?
No he's actually quite intelligent, just bent a bit by partisanship and somewhat tainted by the fact that he was likely part of the generation that did nothing for anyone but themselves so they think they are saving the world by being metro-sexual.
Had some black liberal talkshow host been called white by a conservative caller, and djohn started a thread on it, the tone would be completely different.
Actually I wouldn't have watched/read the OP, same as what I did here. I would have mocked Nathan's response, though, most likely, because it's always vacuous "woe is the white man" whining.
Then Chris would have called me out, unprovoked, because I've accurately pegged him as an incel and a loner, which has wounded him emotionally, and you would have coattailed on his post, for whatever reason, even though both Chris and Nathan are far below your level intellectually.
So it probably would have worked out the same.
bunny/pancake
nah, just shows a pattern. darrin gets unneccessarily hot and bothered over sjw activity. spurminator has had the same response of "you care too much about this stupid ." dont see where the supposed partisan leanings come into play, or your weird shpiel about generations and metrosexuality
But theyre the same but mirror images of each other!!..or something. feeling lazy here with this take but I gave it
Can you show me the intelligent posts? I can write wordy diatribes with fancy adjectives to prove my intelligence, but I prefer succinct sentences straight and to the point. All I'm seeing is a cynical man who projects his own inadequacies to what he perceives as low hanging fruit. That's just my opinion though.
He's not as smart as a Ben Garrison cartoon or a ThomasPaine1774 tweet mind you....but i think hes smart nonetheless myself
You can usually tell by people who may dabble in talk but return to dialogue even with people they've been "at it" with. It takes some re ed minds to constantly harp on the same stupid without ever recalibrating the discussion now and again, some Boutons level .
You really can't Chris, and you wouldn't know what an intelligent post looks like if it would slap you repeatedly. There's a reason only one poster here was deemed a robot on Twitter AND actually admitted to it in this place.
Stick to copy pasta, that's your thing.
That's your thing and I called you out on it a while back. Still salty about it I see.
rofl, time to post det 60 tweet thread nobody reads. chop chop.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
