Reply With Quote
yes, time to get rid of the 3-point line that turned a game of pyhisical and mental skill (basketball) into a boring teenager videogame
Or at least increase the rim height by 2 feet, thereby making more difficult the angle on long shots.
yes, time to get rid of the 3-point line that turned a game of pyhisical and mental skill (basketball) into a boring teenager videogame
Or at least increase the rim height by 2 feet, thereby making more difficult the angle on long shots.
What attracted me to the sport in my youth was the strategy and the plays. I would love to see them become a more important part of the sport again. However, teenage videogamers are the demographic of commercial relevance. No going back.
I one of the better posts in this forum. The game boils down to watching and waiting to see who misses the next three... defense has all but been removed from the game.
the 3pt shot is actually the only thing giving teams a puncher's chance against GSW. The league is finally adapting to it and it's a big reason why the Warriors aren't ever going anywhere close to 73-9 again. Rockets had a shot until they had one of the biggest choking jobs in history (and no CP3)
The only folks that should say goodbye to the midrange is us. 1st in 3p%, 28th in attempts. Less DDR/LMA fadeaway midranges, more beautiful game.
So they watch basketball for the3 s?
Tthe least highlighty shot in basketbaqll with so many players being good at in 2019?
2K most likely; nobody runs plays in games when they could just jack up 50 3s. I do the exact same thing.
Like everything else, this will likely swing back, at least to some extent. We LITERALLY beat Houston in the playoffs because they refused to take 15 footers that were open. When you ONLY take 3s or drive to the rim, you make the defense's job easier. Pop is only the first to realize that not only do teams not shoot from mid-range any more, they don't DEFEND it, either. There are easy, uncontested shots in that area.
That’s because if the team can make their 3s ata good percentage, and make layups, the long 2 is an inefficient shot
The game of basketball is a game of strategy correct. And the 3pt shot is a part of the strategy. It’s trying to get open shot, higher percentage shots and that’s what Pop is trying to beat with their own medicine. 3pt shots are necessary to free-up the lanes. If other teams have better 3pt shooters then be it. It’s the challenge of how to beat the system instead of whining about it. I hate the Harden’s foul baits tbh. But as long as the refs don’t give him those 4 stepbacks, traveling, and ticky-tac foul. But to get back to 3pt line, it’s part of the game and whoever can use to his advantage imo
Any 3-point shot from an average shooter IS NOT 50% less efficient than a 2-point shot from an average shooter, but it is rewarded with 50% more output.
There is no way around it, the productivity of the 3-point shot is immensely superior, and the difference compounds esponentially with every shot taken.
That's why 3-point volume-shooting offenses dominate the NBA. It is, sadly, simple math.
Unfortunately.
It's very efficient when it's unguarded. That's what Pop has discovered. Because everyone else is shooting only 3s and going to the rim, teams no longer know how to defend the mid-range game.
During the hot streak, SA was #1 in the NBA on ORtg with our "inefficient" mid range offense, and that likely would have continued if Gay and Beli didn't get hurt.
Eh. That hot streak had more to do with Bertans, Beli, Forbes, and to a lesser extent Gay making shots out of their minds
The Spurs' midrange game is part of what is freeing up our 3-point shooters. When defenses are staying home on our perimeter players our 3-point percentages seriously free-fall. I think this team does need both to be successful. Credit has to be given to Gay, DeRozan and LMA for their ability to get the defenses to sag off our 3-point shooters.
I agree with this concept, but I still think a better balance could be achieved: The Spurs being #1 in the NBA in 3ptFG% but #30 in 3ptFGA seems like too dramatic a disparity to me.
https://www.teamrankings.com/nba/sta...mpted-per-game
Solid post and I agree. The league is just waiting on the next dominant big for it go back to inside-out.
Is it more of a disparity that Houston being #16 in 3G% and being the 3 pointiest team, shooting over 1000 more 3 pointers than we have...so far?
The roughly 15+ foot jumper to the three point line is the inefficient shot that I’m fine being gone and eliminated from the game. Once you start creeping out further closer to the three point line, it makes no sense not to step out just a little further out to get rewarded 50% more points.
However there are shots inside roughly 15 feet but not all the way to the rim that could still be valuable parts of an offense. The runner / floater, short pull-up jumper, different hooks, baby, facing, half hooks, the fade-away started from a backdown from the low post, short elbow bankshot. Especially for guards and wings who want to avoid shotblocking right at the rim, there’s an area inside the three and just outside the immediate area around the basket that can be efficient enough to be a part most offenses. And with all the spacing three point shooting provides, those areas are relatively open to exploit. Just need practice.
Part of the problem with these these shots is they aren’t practiced as much or much at all. That’s part of their inefficiency. If players who aren’t great three point shooters invest their practice time perfecting some of those shots, where they end up being 50-60% efficient at those shots, then that trumps the efficiency of the three point shot if they’re only 30-33% shooters from behind the arc. Even in this three point proliferation era, there’s still value in some type of midrange offense.
I don't think the youngings are that re ed yet to think that is excitting basketball.
Just because Heroes of Might and Magic 5 or whatever is popular, does not mean they want to see it in an action movie.
So make a 3 worth 4 & a 2 worth 3? Only worth 33% more that way.
I say make a 3 worth 2, as it is supposed to be, and play real basketball again
nah, just allow some kind of physicality in the perimeter and ban illegal screens (as it should be), and the facility to create open shots (and consequently their efficiency) will decrease, it's quite simple really
I don't want to see points change as I think it would ruin stats. I still think the corner 3 just needs to go and keep everything the same. The 3 point line should be the same length across the court. Currently, you must defend the corner and it really takes away one defender out of the equation. He is in his own island out there and can only cover the baseline. He can't come down and help, and if he rotates up the top, ball movement will give you an open baseline 3.
If this was removed and it was only a 2, I can see teams forgoing the corner to help down low, to help on the penetration. Defense would just get much better. At the moment, its the best open shot in the game.
The way shooters are protected, running at a shooter is really difficult to do. The way players defend now is to run to the side of them and contest the shot. That is why there are so many blow-bys now. Rotations can't stop the 3.
Warriors wouldn't be anything without the 3 point shot.
The only folks that should say goodbye to the midrange is us. 1st in 3p%, 28th in attempts. Less DDR/LMA fadeaway midranges, more beautiful game.
Derozan and Aldridge rank #1 and #2 in the NBA in 2pt field goals attempted this season despite being ranked #9 and #16 in overall field goal attempts
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
