Reply With Quote
Let’s get nobody
I'd lo e him
Let’s get nobody
T. Thompson for Pau! Win in my book
I really like Alec Burks but he's been injury prone his entire career but still feel he has untapped potential. Nevertheless, I think standing pat makes sense if there is no 3 and d guy out there as a backup 3. If DDR would get back to playing like he was before, we have a solid "big" 3.
Cleveland has this SF that could prove useful...name is something Blossomgame. Spur should get him included.
Spurs aint doing bois...get used to the Holting Pattern (tm) again
Eh, they'd probably just keep him stashed in the GLeague for like three years.
No interest in either. Conley would be more useful, but he's not worth the resources to get him, even if that's just cap space.
Would like the spurs to maybe trade for garret temple
pau and forbes for marc and mike. do it!
Just bring back Fathead.
Do they want to salary dump them or get draft picks (lol)?
If they want to salary dump... Pau, Forbes, and Cunningham for Marc Gasol works.
Permaban.
In two seasons that cancerous piece of has caused the Spurs to lose Kawhi, Parker, and Manu and now the Grizzlies to lose Gasol and Conley.
Maybe because I listen to Dunc'd On but i'm pretty sure i've heard that he is a pretty bad defender or at least overratted several times before. Either way, not worth his $18.5 million dollar bill next season and I doubt the Spurs would be interested in paying that price.
What resources?
Yuck. $18.5 million for Thompson next season. Spurs are much better off with Gay, Aldridge, Bertans and Poeltl.
Considering he makes like 32 million a year, we would need to trade a good amount of salary. Which seems pretty unlikely given Conley is on the wrong side of 30, due 65 million over the next two years, and spurs have Murray/White. Why on earth would we even be interested in Conley
no. Gasol is overrated. Aldridge is just fine. Conley is way overpaid and injury prone
9 good rotation players is pretty damn good tbh. There is always a risk of injury but this team's depth is the reason why they are 19-7 over their last 26 games.
Walker, Murray, and White went down and Forbes stepped up. Then White came back and proved that he's and NBA player. Poeltl was a 3rd string center but played well when Gasol went down and is now the back up five. I don't know how many playoff teams can say they have 9 quality NBA players in their rotation.
It would be nice to add a player like Carrol for Gasol but I wouldn't do any of the other trades that have been posted here.
They could still have all those guys. TT’s money is really irrelevant unless Gay demands a hefty raise. The question is would you rather have Pau + the MLE, no Pau + the MLE or TT + the MLE?
It will be interesting to see what MEM gets for Marc if it comes to that. Like I said, he’s still a very good player but the fact he has a player option has to scare teams away somewhat.
For MEM, they have to feel like they may just have to get anything for a guy who is leaving anyways.
Spurs don’t need depth. You don’t give up first round picks for guys that don’t move the needle. Would having more depth be good? Sure, but they don’t need it.
But yeah, if you can give up Pau/Pondexter/Cunningham and maybe like a 2nd round pick to take a flier on someone younger, im fine with that.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
