Reply With Quote
worried about what alyssa milano says
Chris obsessed with celebrities.
Why is that funny? Are you under the impression that the system doesn't need mouthpieces?
lol "Free Press"
New York Senate Passes Bill Legalizing Abortions Up to Birth
https://www.lifenews.com/2019/01/22/...s-up-to-birth/
ing sick people.
Once signed by Democratic governor Andrew Cuomo, who has long pushed for expansive abortion-rights legislation, the bill will expand the state’s already liberal abortion regime to allow late-term abortions when “the patient is within twenty-four weeks from the commencement of pregnancy, or there is an absence of fetal viability, or the abortion is necessary to protect the patient’s life or health.”
The legislation provides a further exception to permit abortion at any point during pregnancy if a health-care prac ioner deems it necessary for the mother’s life or health — the exception that was defined in Roe companion case Doe v. Bolton as “all factors — physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman’s age — relevant to the wellbeing of the patient.” In other words, abortion will be available to women essentially on demand up to the point of birth. The RHA will also decriminalize abortion, moving it from the state’s criminal code to the public-health code.
---
The (Supreme) Court's opinion in Doe v. Bolton stated that a woman may obtain an abortion after viability, if necessary to protect her health. The Court defined "health" as follows:
Whether, in the words of the Georgia statute, "an abortion is necessary" is a professional judgment that the Georgia physician will be called upon to make routinely. We agree with the District Court, 319 F. Supp., at 1058, that the medical judgment may be exercised in the light of all factors - physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman's age - relevant to the well-being of the patient. All these factors may relate to health.
---
Great stuff from New York, especially respecting current Supreme Court precedent...
dem headlines
they basically codified Roe v Wade/Planned Parenthood v Casey
basically said women are free to terminate pregnancies up until the point of viability. after viability, it must be to preserve the life/health of the mother. that's already cons utionally protected.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/fed...pinion-1959104
so please explain to me how new york's new statute is some radical law that is any different than the supreme court's ruling from nearly 3 decades ago
Universities don't teach students how to behave at all, Chris.
STOP THE PRESSES, A LIBERAL IN CALI SPIT ON SOMEONE'S SIGN AT A COLLEGE CAMPUS!
SOMEONE SHOULD CALL THE POLICE, PROPERTY WAS DAMAGED!
fascistic oral roberts so-called U, liberty so-called U, etc Christian Taliban madrasas do, and they forbid, punish violated proscriptions
chrisbot continuing to spam tweets and links, avoiding any actual dialogue at all costs
Undo ented is more dangerous than all those. Because undo ented shouldn't exist.
You're a disingenuous person. What's the point?
only if bursting your misinformed bubble is being "disingenuous"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
