trump is another great example of somebody who lacked experience to hold his position. and the results are showing.
i like to type in small caps. and run-ons. the results show that there is a deep state resistance embedded in media, intelligence agencies. and all branches of government. thank you trump for exposing the swamp creatures. aoc is dumb as a rock. and you agree with her.
punctuation smack
she's correct that shultz lacks the experience to be president. doesn't matter how smart she is or isn't. if she said 5+5 = 10 are you going to disagree with her just because you think she's generally stupid?
He's doing a great job of triggering snowflakes like you.
Do you like him?
Yes or no.
Pre-emptive ding: Obama lacked extensive governmental experience but at the very least had knowledge of cons utional law. Nonetheless we're pretty lucky he turned out to be a middling president.
People known mainly as businessmen as POTUS without elected government experience?
Trump and Hoover?
Yikes tbh.
Muh pigeonhole though
You declared I didn't like the guy but you're too terrified to speak for yourself.
lol derp
And you haven't disputed that.
I'm laughing at you.
Do you like the guy?
Yes or no.
Is that supposed to bother me?
Sociopath Chump
to his credit barry had also been a state senator for 6 years prior to his 4 year stint as a US senator. a decade of legislative experience is at least something, in addition to his legal career
Triggered you into replying.Is that supposed to bother me?
lol derp
So, you were attention whoring
Hence the "extensive" qualifier. That's close to a bare minimum IMO. Good point about legislative experience. People tend to make a bigger deal of executive experience but it's been a pretty mixed bag for presidents with only that.
Triggering you is easier than falling off a log. You should make it more difficult.So, you were attention whoring
Derp, you notice you're only talking about me here?
lol obsessed
I noticed you being a drama queen.
Hoover was and Trump is a terrible president.I noticed you being a drama queen.
Would you like to post about the discussion or would you only like to post about me?
State your choice.
Expanding asylum seeker/refugee applications and overall immigration numbers is a form of this
No.
Open borders are open borders.
No one here has advocated open borders.
Period.
You apparently consider 60,000 a month flowing over our southern border to be acceptable since it used to be more. That's pretty much accepting open borders.
No.
Sorry.
Do you consider this a crisis, CC?
Yes or no.
Crisis is an intentionally loaded word. I consider it totally unacceptable.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote