Reply With Quote
Scary!
That Trump is still giving her.
Scary!
Huber/Horowitz
Better safe than dead.
Why are you against the FBI volunteers' taking precautions?
What about them?
Explain.
She's under investigation.
TSA was bragging that Huber was keeping all his indictments sooper dooper secret because reasons.
Wouldn't it look exactly the same if he has no indictments on file at all?
"dabom2" has no idea what is being discussed here.
Actually no. The investigation is under review.
For a year and a half.
And Huber refused to update Congress about it.
lol
No, that's warranted laughter tbh.
lol "predict the future! (oh you can't? lol you got shutdown!)"
lol "dabom2"
Huber is investigating the Clinton Foundation.
Horowitz is investigating the 'HQ Special' and already outlined the corruption there with his first report. FBI raided a whistleblower a few months ago...https://dailycaller.com/2018/11/29/f...inton-uranium/
(you're welcome)
He has nothing to fear
He has nothing to fear
Quoting me and then dodging my question by posing one of your own lol
Why hasn’t Glenn Simpson been indicted by Mueller? It falls under his mandate.
Speaking of being wrong.
Do you really want me to list all the you've been wrong about in this thread? So wrong and embarrassed that you went into hiding each time. If you want I'll list all of them and the amount of time you hid like a little , just say when.
I see you Raul, I mean djohn
Because he hasn't committed a crime probably.
“Simpson testified to the Intelligence committee on Nov. 14, 2017 that he did not meet with anyone from the Justice Department or FBI until after the election. But Ohr testified that he met Simpson on Aug. 22, 2016.”
Explain how Stone lying to the Intelligence committee is a crime but Glenn Simpson lying to Intelligence committee is not a crime.
Did he amend his testimony?
Was he under oath?
Also was it material?
Also why can't Whittaker bring charges via the local AUSA?
I don't know the answers to any of these.
Explain your understanding of each.
Last edited by Pavlov; 01-30-2019 at 09:56 PM.
Because - all he has to do is go in - JUST LIKE JEFF SESSIONS DID -
and say he thought it was after the election but "my bad - I guess if you say it was in August - then so be it"
and there goes your stupid traitor conspiracy to attack the good guys and defend the traitors.
Simpson/Ohr/Comey/Strock et al were simply doing their jobs and commenting on what a piece of trump is - just the same as 67% of all other americans -
yet your cult and you destroyed their lives -
trump and his criminal enterprise - sold out their country, stole the election, betrayed their oaths, laundered billions, etc -
and all you can do is defend their crimes.
You are a piece of . I would you up if I ever ran into you.
you.
meltdown harder
No meltdown - just factual.
Trump sides with the enemy who attacked the USA -
you support the traitor.
You are a traitor.
You would deserve it.
No he didn’t amend his testimony. Yes he was under oath. Yes it was material. Whitaker could, but that’s not what we are discussing.
Explain how Stone lying to the Intelligence committee is a crime but Glenn Simpson lying to Intelligence committee is not a crime.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
