How re ed do you have be to think this will prevent murders? She compares it to the tax on the frequent usage of cigarettes. Of course this is just another attack on law abiding gun owners. That's the only objective. Let's make is cost prohibitive to practice your second amendment rights and compare the tax to cancer sticks. These people need help. Only you can vote the big government authoritarians out.
just like smoking it's not like there aren't substantial social costs associated with using guns as they're designed. tens of thousands thousands of trauma injuries yearly
why would it unreasonable to require gun users to pay a portion for the socialized costs?
8 kids EVERY day SHOT IN USA
That's total bull . The honest gun owners/hunters will get hammered while the crooks and bangers wont give a .
Tens of thousands? Can you source that?
They do with their taxes. We have the 2nd amendment in this country and discouraging the legal usage of guns is an insult to the Cons ution and illogical.
If you don't want socialized costs then don't socialize the costs. Socialized costs shouldn't be an invitation by the government to control citizens to their ideal.
If don't give a about the rights of Americans then Dems should tax the ammunition of the demo that commits 50% of homicides.
Hey legal gun owners we want to discourage you from practicing shooting.
Hey poor Americans this amendment is out of reach for your income level.
Guys let's socialize costs so then will have that as an excuse for our authoritarian rules.
Do any blacks live in Connecticut?
Tax protesters because the socialized costs that come with police, cleanup, etc.
No, that's an hetical to our cons ution.
But the socialized costs.
Ok. Those costs are shared. You don't burden people to control them.
Oh. That was my plan.
Probably.
Meh, their homicide rate is fairly enviable. Law probably won't pass.
Wouldn't stop anything...so now you have to pay $10 for a box of 9mm FMJ.
that 's hairline taxed her ass.
2.8 billion yearly on treating gunshot wounds. I 'll try to find. figure on how many cases that is.
Might be as many as 90,000 Americans yearly:
https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/fu...haff.2017.0625
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...unshot-wounds/
Better stats ight be easier to find ( that study covers just 8 years) if the US Congress hadn't made it illegal to appropriate money to study it
Wonder why that is?
Lol 1st Amendment superpatriots demand society subsidize the social costs of gun use at public hospitals and through higher insurance premiums.
gun fellators prioritize their (perverted) rights to guns over the rights of humans to live
Took you three posts to get to your real point. Congrats on your restraint!
melodramatic hyperbolic .
I notice you ignored my reply after asking me a direct question, then turned around and slapped boutons for acting like himself.
So tuff!
Freedom has a price and that price is shared.
But really your problem seems to be socialized healthcare.
Where is the bill that says "the right to smoke shall not be infringed"?
Some of you act like you're from another country (some are) and don't understand we have a Bill of Rights.
How does taxing infringe on the right to bear arms?
I wasn't aware guns amd ammo were tax free, is that really the case?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
