Reply With Quote
I've posted that same video at least three times already.
you go out of your way to find this , tbh
I've posted that same video at least three times already.
TSA concerned with how Stone was arrested when weeks ago he laughed off the idea of Stone being arrested
Comrade TSA -
90
Point remainsI've posted that same video at least three times already.
I wasn't
Explain.
No I don't think they above that but your scenario where they would makes no sense. The do ent was sent from CNN to Stone's lawyer. Stone's lawyer sent to the judiciary. Where in that exchange do Stone's people come alter the metadata?Do you think people connected with or supporters of Roger Stone are above altering metadata to discredit Mueller?
There was rampant speculation Stone would be indicted because the grand jury had been reconvened. Including from Stone himself.
Has Weissmann proven to be a dirty prosecutor? yes or no
Do you think Weissmann is above tipping off CNN about the indictment so they could have cameras rolling at Stone's house when he was arrested?
How did CNN receive the indictment before it was filed under seal?
A sensational muh Russia news story to smear Trump by association even though the indictment had nothing to do with Trump/Russia election collusion.Which accomplishes what?
Explain.
So your theory makes no sense at all.
What was the first do ent on the DOJ site? Was it the same as the draft? The lawyer's wording is terrible there.
Sorry, multiple questions pending.
Where in that exchange do Stone's people come alter the metadata?
Has Weissmann proven to be a dirty prosecutor? yes or no
Do you think Weissmann is above tipping off CNN about the indictment so they could have cameras rolling at Stone's house when he was arrested?
How did CNN receive the indictment before it was filed under seal?
Who gives a .
A traitor to this country - got arrested in a "by the book" arrest.
Who gives a that is not a russian traitor?
Just you dumb traitorous piece of .
Dunno. Probably wasn't altered. Sounds like the draft was on the website from the lawyer's messy narrative.
Since that's a matter of opinion, no.Has Weissmann proven to be a dirty prosecutor? yes or no
I see no point to it tbh, especially since those on the right are whining about the FBI's tactics like little es.Do you think Weissmann is above tipping off CNN about the indictment so they could have cameras rolling at Stone's house when he was arrested?
Goes back to my question about the first do ent on the DOJ site.How did CNN receive the indictment before it was filed under seal?
Maybe you can take a crack at it.
I don't think you will.
There was no Pacer heading on the do ent. It wasn't from the website. How did CNN receive the indictment before it was filed under seal?
What was the first do ent from the website?
Why does he go on about the first do ent from the website?
Are you going to take a crack at that?
Irrelevant. First and second on PACER had PACER header.
Who would have access to a draft copy of the indictment before it was filed under seal? How did CNN obtain a draft copy of the indictment without a PACER header before it was filed under seal?
Where does it say the first had a PACER header?
And again, why would Weissmann have to send an entire do ent to CNN with his name on it? Dude could just call someone to tip them off. If it's his draft, it's more likely it isn't him.
this is just wrong. wayback machine to the rescue
https://web.archive.org/web/20190125...ustice.gov/sco
this is from january 25. you can click the indictment that was posted there. no pacer heading.
then you flip forward one day to january 26 (or i'll just directly link here... https://web.archive.org/web/20190126...ustice.gov/sco )
and you click the indictment again and there is a pacer heading
You're missing the point. How did CNN obtain a draft copy of the indictment with metadata showing it was created and modified a full day before the indictment was filed under seal?
Lol wrong again
#95
Trump traveled to Moscow in the 90s to discuss real estate projects with Russian officials: ex-mayor
Donald Trump meets with fellow American real estate magnates and Russia's deputy mayor in Moscow in 1995.
Moscow’s former mayor Yury Luzhkov has revealed that in the 1990’s,
he held talks with Donald Trump about building a “sprawling” underground mall near the Russian State Duma.
The Moscow Times reported that Luzhkov, in an interview published with the Interfax news agency earlier on Tuesday, said
Trump had “one or two” contacts with Vladimir Resin, a current Duma member who was then first deputy mayor, about the proposed project.
“[Trump] planned to take part in the mall’s construction,” the ex-mayor told Interfax.
“There were intentions… but the matter didn’t go further.”
Resin spoke to Trump and other American real estate moguls in 1995 — and the conversations were broadcast on Russian state television.
“Trump also traveled to Moscow in November 1996, where
he announced plans to invest some $250 million in several building projects,
including a high-rise tower just north of [the upscale shopping center] Okhotny Ryad,”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/02/tru...e+Raw+Story%29
page 2 6:22 AM first entry
Oops.
And you still have to explain why he would go out of his way to leave a paper trail when he could've just called in a tip.
You meant run again. Like what you are going to do right now.
Why do you run and hide so often when blows up in your face?
How did CNN obtain a draft copy of the indictment with metadata showing it was created and modified a full day before the indictment was filed under seal?
are we at least dropping the "pacer heading" part of the conspiracy?
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
