Reply With Quote
Spirited Chump
Stupid kid should have had the safety on.
J/K
I actually agree with you on the punishment you'd hand out.
Reminder to anyone who forgot
What is it that you think was accomplished Itt? Honest question.
Cold dead hands crew was pretty funny.
You look like a ing re .
Sure I could have been more clear. I did myself no favors by saying I had no dog in the hunt, then contradicting my position.
El Nono was able to clearly articulate the distinction. I was mocking the paranoid gun nut (read TSA) for his conspiratorial confiscation theory. My point was that there should be no federal restriction on researching the effects of guns on society so that we can make better informed decisions on gun control.
And I fully understand what the BoR is. You’ve already conceded that scotus has upheld limits on those rights. It’s just a matter of degree.
Last edited by Th'Pusher; 02-09-2019 at 09:13 AM.
No you looked like a re .
Low value post.
So many of your responses are non sequitur that any follow-up becomes a tedious exercise to get you back on the right path. Yet you continue to insist that you have an answer for something. Most of the time you don't even know the question.
This is the kind of stuff I am talking about. You throw out something so obviously wrong and when I point that out, instead of acknowledging that you just throw out something else to see what sticks. I don't know why anyone would want to have a conversation with you to be honest when keep throwing these darts.
btw - Federal law prevents hand guns from being sold to people under the age of 21. INFRINGED!!!!!!
The point is the right is not unlimited. It is just a matter of degree to which the right is limited which is done through legislation.
You keep going back to the “what part of shall not be infringed don’t you understand” argument while disregarding the fact that scotus has upheld limitations on the 2A.
Ab initio, gun possession was regulated in no small number of ways. The right to bear arms and gun control arose together.
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/stories/cou...ced-gun-237079
A 21 year old buying a gun and then legally giving it to an 18 year old is re ed.
Says a derp that grudge bumped a 5 year old thread for some derpy reason
You argue what's happened since the 2nd Amendment was written instead of the 2nd Amendment itself. It's like arguing that child molesting isn't a sin since the Catholic church seems to have endorsed those who do it.
It's illegal. It's called a straw purchase. If you weren't so ing stupid you'd know that. This is why debating these things is tedious with you low information posters.
Did you just discover this fact?
Not at all.
Please catch up, Mr. 2nd Amendment absolutist.
Do you really want to consider the concept of slaves being denied 2nd Amendment rights as built in gun control? If so you need to consider they also couldn't vote or do a lot of things. Was that built in control as well?
Again, you don't really have a grasp of this debate, you just fling to see what sticks. Spend a few years on it and get back to me when you have a point you can illustrate in one post.
Touched a nerve, would seem.
The fact that the Cons ution provided the ability to change itself inherently means that was was written then wouldn't be the the last word on the matter.
That's a feature, not a bug.
the Cons ution is not amendable in practice, which is a feature, not a bug. Should be trashed totally for a new Cons ution.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 02-10-2019 at 05:08 PM.
While in another thread, this discussion originated from your suggestion that a Bill introducing a 50% tax increase on ammunition was uncons utional. Why would we limit our discussion to the original text and not what has happened since the second amendment? If the bill were to pass and be challenged in court, wouldn’t established case law be used to determine if the law was uncons utional?
'An individual between 18 and 21 years of age may acquire a handgun from an unlicensed individual who resides in the same State, provided the person acquiring the handgun is not otherwise prohibited from receiving or possessing firearms under Federal law. "
https://www.atf.gov/questions-and-an...gun-unlicensed
Lol low information poster
gun-fellators get their so-called arguments from NRA, GOA, BigGun
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
