Hmmm. I suppose we don't have enough data to conclusively dismiss your theory.
And I guess I can agree that it's possible that he uses the ruse of "peeing in front of kids" to achieve his actual desired outcome of peeing on them.
What kind of a piece of pees on other people's kids -
and then pretends it was unintentional?
(i think i got it right this time!)
![]()
Hmmm. I suppose we don't have enough data to conclusively dismiss your theory.
And I guess I can agree that it's possible that he uses the ruse of "peeing in front of kids" to achieve his actual desired outcome of peeing on them.
I dont agree that its more throughout vetting.
Most “outings” come from deep state/party financed research groups like the Steele Dossier
Most have a hidden agenda. And many if not most of the “outings” turn out to be fake. But the damage is real
It will basically end up to who has the most $ to burn in these “research” smear camaigns
DEEP STATE blackface investigations
hater
I think it is safe to say - that ducks is just a piece of .
smh
Of course anyone looking for dirt on another politician has an agenda. That doesn't mean the found information isn't important. The fake news is a different aspect. I'm not sure how this will ever effectively be dealt with.
Going forward, I think that will be even more prevalent as technology has gotten to the point where pictures can be effectively faked. Videos as well.
Wonder if we'll get to a point of not believing anything on the internet. Which is ironic in that it's the best tool available to educate and disseminate the truth.
No idea. I don't know him. But I'm fairly certain that he just made an unfortunate joke and that he doesn't pee in front of, or on, kids.
Yes it is the best tool for that that but also the best tool available to disseminate lies. Sadly the US government is employing this tool to advance their agenda both to spread some truths and some lies
Correct
Apart from this non-disqualifying weird up by Liz,
any of you assholes have anything to say about her policies?
You ignored, and ignore, Trash's non-stop lying, pussy grabbing, financial fraud, ing, hidden tax and health records, traitorous Pootin fellation, emoluments violations, etc and voted for him, STILL support him anyway.
“weird up”
what benefit did she stand to get or actually get?
Sometimes this sort of information is collected for purely statistical purposes.
Are you certain that isn't the case here?
I think there's very little enthusiasm about her anyway.
Old, white Biden is your only hope.![]()
Was Trump your hope?![]()
Harvard gave recognition/praise to her for being a woman of color.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOO
PRAISE!
Nope
still with her
![]()
At least there are no pics of her in redface.![]()
Still with whom, Darrin?
Figure it out
Why are you always so afraid to explain yourself, Darrin?
No need to explain the blatantly obvious
What's obvious here, Darrin?
yes, weird up, weird quirk for such an accomplished lady
btw, Harvard said she got no advantage if she mentioned her NA heritage. She got into Harvard on merit, no affirmative action, which is how your loverboy dubya got into Yale AND Harvard.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)