Reply With Quote
no one is giving a pass to white boys but white boys also aren't swimming across the rio grande either.
... as in Repug Ditzy Devos protecting college rapists, mounting barriers for their victims?
rightwingers whining about sexual violence only by immigrants proves their racism,
while they give pass to White Boyz will be Boyz who commit nearly all of the sexual violence.
no one is giving a pass to white boys but white boys also aren't swimming across the rio grande either.
That's a nice narrative on due process.
Blacks commit rape at a higher rate than whites.
Pelosi Says She Will Back a Bipartisan Border Deal, Putting the Onus on Trump
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/06/u...rder-wall.html
Yeah, the US is currently in 31 national "emergencies" -- it's a ty law.
“President is on sound legal ground to declare a National Emergency. There have been 58 National Emergencies declared since the law was enacted in 1976, and 31 right now that are currently active, so this is hardly unprecedented.” Congressman Tommcclintock
Which declared emergencies cost $6 billion?
Show me the precedent for that.
If deomocrats wants a cap on how many ice can detain on one time
Just off the first one they caught and move on!
You do your own homework chump
I did.
There are no active emergencies that cost the US taxpayers anything.
lol ducks
ordered wars that cost twilloons we are talking about 1/100 of the budget
To protect USA citizens on their own soil
"twillions"
The War Powers Act is a ty law too.
native white terrorist have killed more Americans than Muslim terrorists.
Trash cancelled grants intended reduce white terrorism
Pooplov has the ass burgers
After holiday lull, Central American family migration returns to record levels, new figures show
https://www.lmtonline.com/news/artic...y-13602434.php
so having a wall is bad
Should USA spend 6 billion talking them down?
"native white terrorists"
Pooplov has the ass burgers
Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., on Sunday lashed out at congressional Democrats for not being “serious” about border security, charging they’ve ignored the best advice from experts on the issue.
In an interview on CBS News’ "Face The Nation," the head of the hard-right House Freedom Caucus said the experts are the ones who best know where money is needed.
“I think what Democrats are trying to do is say, ‘you can spend it here, you can't spend it there.’ Really the experts should decide how we spend it,” he said.
“Border Patrol came in to brief the conference. They gave their top-three priorities. And the conferees have said ‘zero money for those top three priorities,’” he added. “How can you be serious about securing our border if the very people that are experts on securing it say ‘these are our top three priorities, we need money,’ and yet they're saying ‘zero dollars for that?’”
How much of the fentanyl comes through ports of entry?
Also:
Enough to justify a wall I'm sure. If we can funnel it to ports of entry where it can be seized and destroyed that would be great.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions