Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 40
  1. #1
    I saw the video a few times, that was nothing.

    Glad he's back but why the Browns think they need him with Chubb there?

  2. #2
    Believe. Broly's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Browns
    Post Count
    151
    You can never have too many weapons.

  3. #3
    You can never have too many weapons.
    I agree but being there is a real situation with bringing in Hunt, you'd think only a team in real need of a RB would go that route.

  4. #4
    Believe. Fabbs's Avatar
    Post Count
    15,577
    excellent signing.
    Pussy Chiefs are a joke.

  5. #5
    excellent signing.
    Pussy Chiefs are a joke.
    Did the Chiefs really have a choice?

  6. #6
    Believe. Fabbs's Avatar
    Post Count
    15,577
    Did the Chiefs really have a choice?
    Absolutely.

    Let it take 1 year of going thru the kourt system.
    But ya I suppose Goodel and the phony owners would have forced an immediate suspension.
    Still should have tried to stall until the SuperBowl.

  7. #7
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    Baltimore Ravens
    Post Count
    83,678
    I saw the video a few times, that was nothing.

    Glad he's back but why the Browns think they need him with Chubb there?
    Because you cursed Chubb they needed insurance

  8. #8
    Andrew Dufresmed Millennial_Messiah's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Seahawks
    Post Count
    25,936
    Yeah, not cave to public pressure. KC front office’s job is to win les, not be a moral compass for the nation. I mean, they already lost any moral high ground when they signed Tyreek Hill. Considering how bad their third stringer torched New England, chances are KC would have gone to the Super Bowl if they had kept Hunt.
    Yeah and Ware was injured and barely played down the stretch of the season. They were left with Damien Williams and Charcandrick West who are pure scatbacks but nothing else.

    Main reason the Chiefs couldn't score in the first half was because Belichick wasn't afraid of the ground game.

  9. #9
    Absolutely.

    Let it take 1 year of going thru the kourt system.
    But ya I suppose Goodel and the phony owners would have forced an immediate suspension.
    Still should have tried to stall until the SuperBowl.
    How can they have Tyreek Hill AND Hunt?

  10. #10
    Yeah, not cave to public pressure. KC front office’s job is to win les, not be a moral compass for the nation. I mean, they already lost any moral high ground when they signed Tyreek Hill. Considering how bad their third stringer torched New England, chances are KC would have gone to the Super Bowl if they had kept Hunt.
    I agree with all that, it is a shame we are so damn uptight over that kind of thing.

    Just think of how many wanted to say....that got what she deserved....but couldn't.

  11. #11
    Andrew Dufresmed Millennial_Messiah's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Seahawks
    Post Count
    25,936
    I agree with all that, it is a shame we are so damn uptight over that kind of thing.

    Just think of how many wanted to say....that got what she deserved....but couldn't.
    I say that, too. To me all adults should be treated equally. Discriminating or giving an unfair advantage based on gender is simply ridiculous and antiquated. It's not like the was 13 years old or something.

  12. #12
    Veteran JoeTait75's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Browns
    Post Count
    5,378
    Low risk, high reward. If he screws up again or otherwise washes out they still have Nick Chubb and Duke Johnson. So what the , why not? As for any moral implications, Ryan Tucker played for the Browns for several years in the mid-2000's, and when he was at TCU he and three other football players beat up a kid so badly he ended up with permanent brain damage. That's a of a lot worse than what Kareem Hunt did. If I can root for a team with a head like Ryan Tucker, I can root for a team with Kareem Hunt.

  13. #13
    I say that, too. To me all adults should be treated equally. Discriminating or giving an unfair advantage based on gender is simply ridiculous and antiquated. It's not like the was 13 years old or something.
    Not what I'm saying.

    We do have to drop female/male and start looking at the individuals involved. Not just blanket men should never..... There are women out there right there who could beat the out of a guy around the same size. A big strong woman vs a skinny little guy.

    The fact Hunt is a powerful guy hurt him a lot here, but there was no doubt that girl wouldn't back off. If she had nothing would have happened.

  14. #14
    Andrew Dufresmed Millennial_Messiah's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Seahawks
    Post Count
    25,936
    Not what I'm saying.

    We do have to drop female/male and start looking at the individuals involved. Not just blanket men should never..... There are women out there right there who could beat the out of a guy around the same size. A big strong woman vs a skinny little guy.

    The fact Hunt is a powerful guy hurt him a lot here, but there was no doubt that girl wouldn't back off. If she had nothing would have happened.
    yeah, but just like in the Jermaine O'Neal vs. drunk Pistons fan case, it's bull to discriminate against someone because of something they can't help/related to their genetics, like their height and size. It's equally as bad as racial or sexual discrimination. You judge people based on who they are, not things that are out of their control like what they look like or what body parts they have.

  15. #15
    coffee's for closers FrostKing's Avatar
    My Team
    San Francisco 49ers
    Post Count
    19,410
    I saw the video a few times, that was nothing.

    Glad he's back but why the Browns think they need him with Chubb there?
    Yes that "was nothing" but Islam is evil

  16. #16
    yeah, but just like in the Jermaine O'Neal vs. drunk Pistons fan case, it's bull to discriminate against someone because of something they can't help/related to their genetics, like their height and size. It's equally as bad as racial or sexual discrimination. You judge people based on who they are, not things that are out of their control like what they look like or what body parts they have.
    100% wrong.

    You hear a bump in the night, who gets up to check it out?

    You have a flat tire, who gets out to fix it?

    You are at a bar, who asks who to dance?

    Little old lady walks into a bank with a cane, she goes right to the head of the line and everybody is cool with it.

    Some guy says something to you mom, sister, wife, now what?

    Young punks hassling a little old man, you walk up, now what?

    Dude, you are so damn wrong it's comical.

  17. #17
    ( •_•)>⌐■-■ (⌐■_■) AaronY's Avatar
    Post Count
    8,287
    Low risk, high reward. If he screws up again or otherwise washes out they still have Nick Chubb and Duke Johnson. So what the , why not? As for any moral implications, Ryan Tucker played for the Browns for several years in the mid-2000's, and when he was at TCU he and three other football players beat up a kid so badly he ended up with permanent brain damage. That's a of a lot worse than what Kareem Hunt did. If I can root for a team with a head like Ryan Tucker, I can root for a team with Kareem Hunt.
    sound lost in a maze of moral relativism

  18. #18
    Andrew Dufresmed Millennial_Messiah's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Seahawks
    Post Count
    25,936
    100% wrong.

    You hear a bump in the night, who gets up to check it out?

    You have a flat tire, who gets out to fix it?

    You are at a bar, who asks who to dance?

    Little old lady walks into a bank with a cane, she goes right to the head of the line and everybody is cool with it.

    Some guy says something to you mom, sister, wife, now what?

    Young punks hassling a little old man, you walk up, now what?

    Dude, you are so damn wrong it's comical.
    Nope, you're 100% wrong.

    My wife or I could check it out. Whoever is the most energetic/least tired?

    Who says women can't change tires as well as, or better than men? That's sexist.

    I ask girls to dance and girls ask me. Why shouldn't she be allowed to take the first move? It's sexy when girls do that.

    Shouldn't a little old man with a cane deserve the same courtesy and respect?

    Shouldn't I stand up for my dad, brother, best friend as well?


    Dude, you are so damn living in the past, it's comical.

  19. #19
    Nope, you're 100% wrong.

    My wife or I could check it out. Whoever is the most energetic/least tired?

    Who says women can't change tires as well as, or better than men? That's sexist.

    I ask girls to dance and girls ask me. Why shouldn't she be allowed to take the first move? It's sexy when girls do that.

    Shouldn't a little old man with a cane deserve the same courtesy and respect?

    Shouldn't I stand up for my dad, brother, best friend as well?


    Dude, you are so damn living in the past, it's comical.
    No woman of mine checks out that bump in the night or changes a flat. I think you are BSing there.

    Don't believe ya about girls asking you to dance, thought you were married?

    I have seen little old men with a cane stand there before.

    Usually other men don't need your help, you really did't pick up on that?

    Wrong about living in the past.

    I have never seen a woman change a tire with a man standing there watching her, if you tell me you have you are lying.

    You would really let your wife check out a bump in the night, really?

  20. #20
    If they already have one, clearly those ethical boundaries were already crosses. So who cares about another?
    I see it more like.....ok we somehow slide by with Hill, better not push it with Hunt.

  21. #21
    Veteran JoeTait75's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Browns
    Post Count
    5,378
    sound lost in a maze of moral relativism
    Moral relativism is part of the deal when you're a sports fan. Because the reality is you're going to be rooting for guys who have done bad , some you know about, some you don't. You're going to be rooting for guys who cheat on their women, who have broken the law, who are just meathead assholes in general. Not all of them, but some of them. Either you're okay with that or you're not. Either way I think it's stupid to act all high and mighty and preen about how rooting for this one particular guy is going to compromise you. Because if you've been a sports fan long enough, you've probably already been compromised.

  22. #22
    Andrew Dufresmed Millennial_Messiah's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Seahawks
    Post Count
    25,936
    No woman of mine checks out that bump in the night or changes a flat. I think you are BSing there.

    Don't believe ya about girls asking you to dance, thought you were married?

    I have seen little old men with a cane stand there before.

    Usually other men don't need your help, you really did't pick up on that?

    Wrong about living in the past.

    I have never seen a woman change a tire with a man standing there watching her, if you tell me you have you are lying.

    You would really let your wife check out a bump in the night, really?
    Just because I'm *legally* married doesn't mean I still don't date around. Because why wouldn't I?

    And yes, you're definitely living in the gothic medieval era with that double standards sexism bull .


    As for the tire, I wouldn't be standing watching her, I'd probably be helping her to my best ability. But that doesn't mean she can't help me do things like mowing the lawn or driving somewhere, or that I can't cook or do the dishes a chunk of the time. Because that's what egalitarianism is about, right?

    Yes, I take pride in my cooking, and no that doesn't make me an effeminate pansy. My mom was a single mom and the greatest cook in the world, and I was her only child, so I learned from her. Think I'm a because I like to cook? Tell that to Gordon Ramsay, or better yet... Guy Fieri, he'll beat your ass over that one.

  23. #23
    Just because I'm *legally* married doesn't mean I still don't date around. Because why wouldn't I?

    And yes, you're definitely living in the gothic medieval era with that double standards sexism bull .


    As for the tire, I wouldn't be standing watching her, I'd probably be helping her to my best ability. But that doesn't mean she can't help me do things like mowing the lawn or driving somewhere, or that I can't cook or do the dishes a chunk of the time. Because that's what egalitarianism is about, right?
    Dude, are you for real, no women don't need to change a flat or check out that bump in the nigt if we are around, what's wrong with you? And no I;m not living in anything other than reality, yes we are different, where in the have you been?

    Does she lead when you dance? Did she ask you to marry her?

    Sure with the cooking, but that's never really been just a female thing to begin with.

    Women are not men, honest injun~~~~~~~~~~~~

  24. #24
    Andrew Dufresmed Millennial_Messiah's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Seahawks
    Post Count
    25,936
    Dude, are you for real, no women don't need to change a flat or check out that bump in the nigt if we are around, what's wrong with you? And no I;m not living in anything other than reality, yes we are different, where in the have you been?

    Does she lead when you dance? Did she ask you to marry her?

    Sure with the cooking, but that's never really been just a female thing to begin with.

    Women are not men, honest injun~~~~~~~~~~~~
    We mutually agreed and I formally asked her November 2016 on her birthday, but I'd be just fine if a chick I like asks me... I'd be elated and proud of her for having the courage...

    You're way out of touch with the 21st century, tbh. What, does your ty job turn away qualified candidates with 9 1/2 years of relevant years of experience because they don't meet the 10 year minimum criteria?

  25. #25
    We mutually agreed and I formally asked her November 2016 on her birthday, but I'd be just fine if a chick I like asks me... I'd be elated and proud of her for having the courage...

    You're way out of touch with the 21st century, tbh. What, does your ty job turn away qualified candidates with 9 1/2 years of relevant years of experience because they don't meet the 10 year minimum criteria?
    Wrong as usual.

    Dude, you are living in a fantasy, ok?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •