There is an actual guide for gun control advocates to follow when debating.

[Pavlov]

Seriously, you've been using the derp playbook for a full day.

[DMC]

moar narrative

I've never seen you this upset.

The Chumpdumper surrender flag

You're genuinely upset about this.

You seem upset that someone knows more than you do about this.

lol you really are upset about this. I look forward to seeing you try hard from here on.

What does this have to do about your being upset at being a bigot?

Darrin is more upset about this than the journalists who got murdered live on the air.

I just asked a question.
Don't be upset or afraid.

It's not a crime to be worse than them, but the forum has not been as good. Don't be upset by it.

So this ESPY award is important to you.
Why get upset when this is pointed out?

lol these guys are genuinely upset by this black dude.

You, on the other hand, are just upset and spamming again.

Don't expect people like Tyson to believe what you believe and don't get upset when you are told you have no evidence.

And in with the ad hominems.
You're really upset now.

Nice straw man, CC. I can tell you're upset about this..

haven't seen you this upset since the last time I got you this upset.

lol you're such a sissy for getting this upset over your own error.

[DMC]

Seriously, you've been using the derp playbook for a full day.

You're now upset that I exposed you for the hypocrite you are.

Now you've been relegated to "hurr durr i got you to respond" type retorts. Your true forum worth is revealed.

[DMC]

Chumpy working on "you're stalking me" "you're upset" retort with copious amounts of emojis

[Blake]

You didn't say anything about the law. Are you still waiting for your wife to get home from her teaching job?

What do you think the "it" is in "it's re ed"?

To be clear for you, when I say "you're re ed", I mean "you=dmc".

To wit: "dmc is re ed."

[DMC]

What do you think the "it" is in "it's re ed"?

To be clear for you, when I say "you're re ed", I mean "you=dmc".

To wit: "dmc is re ed."

You didn't mention the law.

[boutons_deux]

[Blake]

You didn't mention the law.

What do you think "legally" means?

Good Lord dude you have horrible reading comprehension skills.

[DMC]

What do you think "legally" means?

Good Lord dude you have horrible reading comprehension skills.

Legally riding a bike down the highway during rush hour traffic is re ed. Now am I referring to the law or to the act of riding the bike?

[DMC]

A 21 year old buying a gun and then legally giving it to an 18 year old is re ed.

Here you can see the subject of this sentence is the 21 year old. Therefore you're saying the 21 year old is re ed. Or you are saying that the act of buying the gun and giving it to an 18 year old is re ed. Nowhere in your sentence Did you even indicate that the law itself is re ed.

You're just low rent and sloppily stupid. That's why you're on the bottom of the cuck totem pole here.

[Pavlov]

You're now upset that I exposed you for the hypocrite you are.

Now you've been relegated to "hurr durr i got you to respond" type retorts. Your true forum worth is revealed.

After you declared victory derp-style?

You got mad. Period.

Your true forum worth is revealed.

DerpMC

[Blake]

Legally riding a bike down the highway during rush hour traffic is re ed. Now am I referring to the law or to the act of riding the bike?

If riding a bike on a highway during rush hour is a re ed act on its own, you wouldn't need to preface the statement with the word "legally".

[Blake]

Here you can see the subject of this sentence is the 21 year old. Therefore you're saying the 21 year old is re ed. Or you are saying that the act of buying the gun and giving it to an 18 year old is re ed. Nowhere in your sentence Did you even indicate that the law itself is re ed.

You're just low rent and sloppily stupid. That's why you're on the bottom of the cuck totem pole here.

I probably could have written it clearer to make sure that all re ed posters very clearly understood my intent, but the word "legally" was in my post for a pretty obvious reason.

If it confused you, you could have just asked for clarification instead of building massive walls of legally re ed text.

[DMC]

If riding a bike on a highway during rush hour is a re ed act on its own, you wouldn't need to preface the statement with the word "legally".

You didn't preface your statement with "legally".

In essence, you said "A 21 year old is re ed" then gave the conditions.

If you think there's a loophole that allows a person who cannot legally purchase a firearm to acquire one legally, then say so instead of saying the 21 year old is re ed.

[DMC]

I probably could have written it clearer

I doubt it.

[DMC]

After you declared victory derp-style?

You got mad. Period.

Your true forum worth is revealed.

DerpMC

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/sho...=1#post9704939

[Blake]

You didn't preface your statement with "legally".

In essence, you said "A 21 year old is re ed" then gave the conditions.

If you think there's a loophole that allows a person who cannot legally purchase a firearm to acquire one legally, then say so instead of saying the 21 year old is re ed.

Jesus dude

Just because I didn't start with the word "legally" doesn't mean it has no purpose.

If I wanted to say the 21 year old was re ed for simply giving a gun to an 18 year old, I would have not needed nor would I have used the word "legally" at all.

I've said all I'm gonna say. You're just a drooling re from this point on.

[DMC]

I probably could have written it clearer

Jesus dude

Just because I didn't start with the word "legally" doesn't mean it has no purpose.

If I wanted to say the 21 year old was re ed for simply giving a gun to an 18 year old, I would have not needed nor would I have used the word "legally" at all.

I've said all I'm gonna say. You're just a drooling re from this point on.

Right now you're arguing against yourself.

[Blake]

Right now you're arguing against yourself.

Lol no.

Just because i could have set it clearer doesn't mean it wasn't clear enough.

Drooling illiterate re .

[DMC]

I've said all I'm gonna say.

Followed by

Lol no.

Just because i could have set it clearer doesn't mean it wasn't clear enough.

Drooling illiterate re .

How many times can you use the word "re " in a day, Blake? Is that the pinnacle of your vocabulary? You and Th'Pusher should hook up and play Scrabble, Ducks could beat both of you.

[Pavlov]

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/sho...=1#post9704939

you lied and I called you out.

Sorry, tough guy.

[Th'Pusher]

Followed by




How many times can you use the word "re " in a day, Blake? Is that the pinnacle of your vocabulary? You and Th'Pusher should hook up and play Scrabble, Ducks could beat both of you.

You’re being pedantic again itt. The first time I used that word to describe you you tried to correct me saying I was misusing the word and meant semantic

Btw - How’s that Hillary 2020 prediction going? I see you abandoned that bull pretty quickly.

[DMC]

you lied and I called you out.

Sorry, tough guy.

How did I lie?

I didn't lie, that's why you went to the "upset you" macro.

[DMC]

You’re being pedantic again itt. The first time I used that word to describe you you tried to correct me saying I was misusing the word and meant semantic

Btw - How’s that Hillary 2020 prediction going? I see you abandoned that bull pretty quickly.

You mean this?

Ham hands, the pedantic troll

If it's so pedantic, why do you spend 3 pages hiding from your own words? Just fess up and be done with it.

for memory too it seems. If I said you used the word wrong in a post, it's because you did.

[Pavlov]

How did I lie?

I didn't lie, that's why you went to the "upset you" macro.

Of course you lied.

You got upset after I called you out, tough guy.