Reply With Quote
"an active shooter situation"
"neutralized"
"officer-involved shooting"
ing stupid cop speak, must have been indoctrinated in Army speak.
https://abc7chicago.com/live--aurora...eriff/5140701/
It ain’t the brown migrants you have to worry about. It’s the psychopathic dumbass white peoples with penis envy with guns. Lmao
"an active shooter situation"
"neutralized"
"officer-involved shooting"
ing stupid cop speak, must have been indoctrinated in Army speak.
But the odds of being attacked by someone with a gun are pretty insignificant, therefore you don't need a gun to protect yourself. Right?
Trump supporters awfully quiet. Bunch of ing idiots. White people are the bigger threat and national emergency in the country lol
Not about gun control man. Just saying that mass shootings are a bigger threat to the country than “illegals”
Not necessarily. It's just the flavor of the moment. If mass shootings were such a threat everyone should be armed. Sensational events don't equate to systemic issues. Undo ented immigrants are systemic, chronic issues. It's not just about "illegal" but "undo ented". There are plenty do ented illegal aliens in the US.
I find it interesting that the left thinks an individual should be required to register an inanimate object like a firearm but then people can simply be here completely off the grid, undo ented that they even exist.
going by your logic poor health care, quality of education, the wealth gap, poverty, are ALL systemic issues.
also, I don’t see “undo ented” people shooting up schools and movie theaters.
They are systemic issues. Do you see escaped convicts shooting up schools and movie theaters? How about people who are carrying the Ebola virus? Child molesters? What about serial killers? Ergo none of them are an issue.
not everybody believes that moar guns is the solution to guns
The problem is this. Your statement implies that because something like mass shootings is non-systemic (which is arguable at best) and happens infrequently, it’s not an issue. But mass shootings do happen more frequent in our country than in any other developed one. Secondly, they affect our safety in public. If you argue that terrorism on our soil (which trump implies is brought on by illegals) affects our safety, then you have to argue that mass shootings do the same.
Because not everybody believes themselves to be in imminent danger. Oddly moar guns are called in to neutralize guys like this. Seems like the solution at the time, certainly those who were shot didn't seem to have a pe ion to sign at the time requesting tighter gun control laws.
Why does it matter if it's a mass shooting or a single person shot? If you're the victim, it's the same thing. As a 3rd party remote viewer you're more appalled by mass shootings and more frightened, but you have higher odds of being shot by someone you know than being involved in a mass shooting. I'm not saying it's not an issue, I'm saying that statistically mass shootings are insignificant.
Either way, if you're concerned about being caught up in a situation like that, would you rather be armed or disarmed?
you're too smart to believe the you spew, tbh
that's such a spurtacular level distortion of logic
Changing the subject. The argument is that mass shootings and domestic terror at the hands of disgruntled white dudes are a bigger threat than what’s at the border.
Do you think you can stop mass shootings? If not, how would you hope to defend yourself if you were ever involved in one? Show that the shooter has contradicted himself at some point in the past and hand him an lol emoji?
So it would be ok if it was disgruntled black dudes?
How many unsolved murders exist right now in El Paso Texas because there's no fingerprints on file for the killers? Bet you have no idea.
do you really think gun control legislation is supposed to work by stopping mass shootings that are currently underway?
I Dont see disgruntled black dudes shooting up concerts theatres or schools. Want to avoid black dudes with a gun? Get the out of south Chicago. Want to avoid disgruntled white dudes? Harder to hide from that. They are the bigger threat.
DMC it's like saying smallpox vaccines are worthless because they do nothing to help somebody who already has smallpox
No, which is why i don't rely on legislation to protect me.
Except there's no vaccine for this. Are you saying a person who is in a situation where a mass shooting is unfolding is sentenced to die already? If so I disagree, which is why I say they should be armed. If it was smallpox, they should be vaccinated. You're saying rely on legislation to protect you from smallpox instead of being vaccinated.
A vaccine is the body's version of being "armed". It doesn't stop smallpox from existing, but it does prevent/mitigate the damage it does.
Want to avoid disgruntled white dudes? You can avoid:
—churches
—temples
—schools
—movie theatres
—concerts
—night clubs
—colleges
—las vegas
—your work place
You know, just about everywhere in the country.
Sure as long as you register and get a psych evaluation every year. Oh and your children too.
Good luck getting that to pass. Everyone wants to be a single person legislative body but all these Utopian fantasies do jack to solve the issue.
I don't feel the need to avoid them. If you can respond when the time comes, you're all set. The fear is that you'll be a sitting duck, waiting to be shot. If you feel that way you have the ability (perhaps, you could be a felon) to carry a firearm and have some semblance of a fighting chance.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
