So 1910s and 1920s to rag on Americans for German surnames.
I’m not sure why I continue to go back and forth with you when you don’t even have the basic facts correct.
Trump didn’t tell the OIG to investigate McCabe. The Obama appointed Inspector General was called on by Democrats to investigate the FBI’s handling of the Clinton email investigation. McCabe got caught lying multiple times during these interviews with FBI/OIG.
Democrat’s doing Trump’s bidding calling for IG investigation
guys im having trouble remembering, who appointed Horowitz?I’m not sure why I continue to go back and forth with you when you don’t even have the basic facts correct.
Trump didn’t tell the OIG to investigate McCabe. The Obama appointed Inspector General was called on by Democrats to investigate the FBI’s handling of the Clinton email investigation. McCabe got caught lying multiple times during these interviews with FBI/OIG.
Sad that Spurs Homer still can’t get it correct
djohn dreading that Mueller report
impeachment crowd is going to be disappointed. imo this whole saga would have been a lot shorter if trump didn't fire comey because of the russia thing
im hard pressed to believe we're going to be seeing fresh indictments with the report around the corner
"obvious point to stress is that he has not yet made a single indictment alleging a Trump-Russia conspiracy"
The more obvious point is that he is saving the Trash as traitorous colluder charge for the grande finale after rolling up, flipping so many of Trash's mafiya.
... then there is SDNY that Trash failed to corrupt. Why did he try to corrupt SDNY? what is he hiding?
Why have Trash and his mafiya been
"forgetting", lying, obstructing for 2+ years,
if they are all innocent?
Last edited by boutons_deux; 02-20-2019 at 07:57 PM.
poor fella refuses to discuss it and has already lost all hope in Mueller and the report isn’t even out yetdjohn dreading that Mueller report
Lol
comrade tsa & comrade Qhris aiding and abetting the enemy and each other
FBI’s top lawyer believed Hillary Clinton should face charges, but was talked out of it
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-ho...4YglNw.twitter“I have reason to believe that you originally believed it was appropriate to charge Hillary Clinton with regard to violations of law — various laws, with regard to mishandling of classified information. Is that accurate?” Ratcliffe, a former federal prosecutor, asked Baker.
Baker paused to gain his lawyer’s permission to respond, and then answered, “Yes.”
He later explained why he came to that conclusion, and how his mind was changed:
“So, I had that belief initially after reviewing, you know, a large binder of her emails that had classified information in them,” he said. “And I discussed it internally with a number of different folks, and eventually became persuaded that charging her was not appropriate because we could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that — we, the government, could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that — she had the intent necessary to violate (the law).”
Asked when he was persuaded to change his mind, Baker said: “Pretty late in the process, because we were arguing about it, I think, up until the end.”
Baker made clear that he did not like the activity Clinton had engaged in: “My original belief after — well, after having conducted the investigation and towards the end of it, then sitting down and reading a binder of her materials — I thought that it was alarming, appalling, whatever words I said, and argued with others about why they thought she shouldn’t be charged.”
His boss, Comey, announced on July 5, 2016, that he would not recommend criminal charges. He did so without consulting the Department of Justice (DOJ), a decision the department’s inspector general (IG) later concluded was misguided and likely usurped the power of the attorney general to make prosecutorial decisions. Comey has said, in retrospect, he accepts that finding but took the actions he did because he thought “they were in the country's best interest.”
Baker acknowledged that during the weeks leading up to the announcement, Comey “would throw things out like that to get people to start talking and thinking about it and test his conclusions.”
Baker said that if he had been more convinced there was evidence that Clinton intended to violate the law, “I would have argued that vociferously with him (Comey) and maybe changed his view.”
He portrayed his former boss as someone who was open to changing his mind once he heard from his senior staff, even after drafting his announcement statement. "I think he would have been receptive to changing his view even after he wrote that thing," Baker said.
Baker’s account also shed light on revelations I first reported more than a year ago that the original draft of Comey’s announcement concluded Clinton had been “grossly negligent” in handling her classified emails. That is the term in espionage statutes for criminality, but the language later was softened.
Guess he didn't have a firm feeling about that. He changed his mind.
...
Lol emails bad
treason ok
What was Trill saying about boots on ground?
Coffee boy delusions of grandeur
Thoughts and prayers for resistance
Mueller’s DC Grand Jury was just extended 6 months. This report will focus on obstruction. As it would be smart to first report on obstruction and then you tell the conspiracy story through indictments, just as Mueller has been doing.
Because, if you are investigating a conspiracy amongst a group of people, you aren’t going to report that and tip them all off. Also, there is no mandate for Mueller to shut down after his report
‘There’s abundant evidence that Donald Trump has committed crimes in office’: Trump biographer
The Trump biographer took it a step further, saying: “I believe, wittingly or not, that he is a Kremlin agent….we actually have a Kremlin agent in White House.”
“When the day comes that he’s not president,” Johnston continued,
“he must be indicted and convicted by a jury and imprisoned,
otherwise he will do, on steroids, what he did during the 2016 campaign….
call [on] people to commit acts of violence…
argue that the US government is not legitimate,
that law enforcement/intelligence agencies are not legitimate
because they don’t see the world the way Donald Trump thinks it ought to be.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/02/the...e+Raw+Story%29
Because, if you are investigating a conspiracy amongst a group of people, you aren’t going to report that and tip them all off. Also, there is no mandate for Mueller to shut down after his reportMueller’s investigation is a big secret no one is aware of
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
