Reply With Quote
It freed all slaves in the union.
"did nothing for the slaves in the union."
You really don't know anything.
Derp.
Are you saying that the EP was uncons utional when Lincoln issued it?
It freed all slaves in the union.
You really don't know anything.
Derp.
I'm saying it's not the Cons ution and it did nothing for the slaves in the union.
Period.
What part do you not understand?
It's the Cons ution that allowed for the freeing of the slaves unless you're saying that EP was uncons utional.
Legally, yes.
You really don't know anything.
Derp.
"
Derptacular persistence is derptacular.
I'm not sure I've ever seen such studious avoidance of the plain meaning of what other people say.
Standard stuff for chump.
Standard for you.
Your avoidance of plain vanilla questions is remarkable.
those slaves weren't in the union.
lol derp
Tell that to Abraham Lincoln. He seems to have been under the impression that he had jurisdiction.
Tell that to the confederates that kept their slaves after that.
It did nothing for the slaves in the union.
And it wasn't the Cons ution.
Period.
Ah, poor chumpy. The law's the law 'cept when it's not.
Don't worry; you're fluffer(s) will come by and tell you this is a W for you.
Ah, poor chumpy. The law's the law 'cept when it's not.
You're wrong about the proclamation then.
It's not the Cons ution and it did nothing for the slaves in the union.
Period.
All law is either supported by the Cons ution or it's not, numb nuts. You haven's said that EP was uncons utional. You're trying to insult your way out of a giant L.
You're wrong about the proclamation then.
It's not the Cons ution and it did nothing for the slaves in the union.
Period.
Par.
Seriously, you're a ing idiot. Seriously. No lol.
Can you believe that guy? OMG!
I never claimed it was uncons utional. The EP only freed slaves because they were still considered property and the confiscation of property was allowed.All law is either supported by the Cons ution or it's not, numb nuts. You haven's said that EP was uncons utional. You're trying to insult your way out of a giant L.
Par.
It's not the Cons ution and it did nothing for the slaves in the union.
Period.
You simply have no idea what you're talking about.
Ah. So, the Cons ution worked for blacks after all.
Actually no.Ah. So, the Cons ution worked for blacks after all.
The Cons ution didn't work for them until it was amended.
The Cons ution either allowed the freeing of the blacks or it didn't. This is fundamental stuff, psychopav.Actually no.
It had to be amended to free the slaves.
Oh, so now it was uncons utional you've decided pscyhopav.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions