Translation:
"Stop pointing out the stupid things I said back then."
Dude, that is weak, even for you.
Using the inauguration as a slush fund, coddling dictators, trying to transfer nuke tech to Saudi, letting lobbyists regulate the industries they represent, conducting domestic policy and foreign relations to benefit his own family and business cronies, paying a huge bribe to the political donor class as a tax cut, screwing farmers, alienating US allies...it ain't all about the loss in 2016. The losses have piled up since.
Translation:
"Stop pointing out the stupid things I said back then."
Dude, that is weak, even for you.
Tobe fair Most of the things you listed were done by most presidents before Orange with Hair
Most are actual job requirements![]()
The funny thing my , one of the judges in Mueller’s investigation just name dropped collusion
but TSA seddddddd Mueller wasn’t investigating collusion![]()
I never once said Mueller wasn’t investigating collusion.
I said Mueller hasn’t indicted a single person for collusion. That’s a fact.
Holy that goddamn goalpost move![]()
![]()
![]()
Mueller investigating collusion. That’s it and that’s all folks.
"autistic screeching"
![]()
Trump: "I could shoot a man in the middle of 5th Avenue, and my supporters would call anyone who complained an autistic screecher. Sounds great, right? Autistic screecher. It's the best buzzphrase."
No amount of smilies will hide how re ed your take was. Find a single post of me saying Mueller was not investigating collusion.
You said collusion theory dead multiple times and said Mueller wasn’t investigating it![]()
Again, find a single quote of me claiming Mueller was not investigating collusion, or run away like a pussy again.
You are very careful not to go out on any limb for predictions. Wonder why.
What do you think is in all that redacted space in what we do know so far?
Is it possible that he is saving the worst for last?
Do racketeering trials generally paint pictures of individual misdeeds before the overall conspiracy charge?
The answer to both, is, yes.
Now what? No, not yet, and yes, we have a ways to go.
Care to predict whether someone will be charged? (makes chicken noises)
TSA in 2017 "no collusion"
TSA in 2019: No one has been indicted yet.
Happy to give you that. You have never claimed Mueller wasn't investigating collusion.
You just were deluded by paranoia and stupidity as to whose collusion was being investigated. Or duped. Feel free to tell me which word is better, duped, or deluded.
Sure. Manafort indicted AND convicted, not Podesta. To beat you to it: Not for Russian collusion, just for lying about meetings and ties with Russians, because that is simply what people do.
I’ve nevered waivered on collusion from the get go. I predict no one from Trump campaign will be charged with colluding with Russia during the election.
None of what Manafort was indicted for had anything to do with election collusion. The things Manafort were actually indicted for are directly tied to Podesta so I fully expect Tony Podesta and Craig Greg to be indicted as well since they were involved in the scheme. You should be calling for their indictments as well.
"no collusion"
"no collusion"
TSA in 2017 "no collusion"
TSA in 2019: No one has been indicted yet.
Happy to give you that. You have never claimed Mueller wasn't investigating collusion.
You just were deluded by paranoia and stupidity as to whose collusion was being investigated. Or duped. Feel free to tell me which word is better, duped, or deluded.
Sure. Manafort indicted AND convicted, not Podesta. To beat you to it: Not for Russian collusion, just for lying about meetings and ties with Russians, because that is simply what people do.It's like you can't help yourself.
Sure, if they did something wrong, they should be charged/indicted. Easy. For what? Don't say "things". 'n stuff.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)