1. #44501
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,927
    Using the inauguration as a slush fund, coddling dictators, trying to transfer nuke tech to Saudi, letting lobbyists regulate the industries they represent, conducting domestic policy and foreign relations to benefit his own family and business cronies, paying a huge bribe to the political donor class as a tax cut, screwing farmers, alienating US allies...it ain't all about the loss in 2016. The losses have piled up since.

  2. #44502
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    You know the Cohen testimony has RG shook when he’s having to go back to posts from 2017
    Translation:
    "Stop pointing out the stupid things I said back then."

    Dude, that is weak, even for you.

  3. #44503
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105
    Using the inauguration as a slush fund, coddling dictators, trying to transfer nuke tech to Saudi, letting lobbyists regulate the industries they represent, conducting domestic policy and foreign relations to benefit his own family and business cronies, paying a huge bribe to the political donor class as a tax cut, screwing farmers, alienating US allies...it ain't all about the loss in 2016. The losses have piled up since.
    Tobe fair Most of the things you listed were done by most presidents before Orange with Hair

    Most are actual job requirements

  4. #44504
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    38,218
    Yeah, it’s annoying hearing you whine about college kids all that time.
    The funny thing my , one of the judges in Mueller’s investigation just name dropped collusion


  5. #44505
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    38,218



    but TSA seddddddd Mueller wasn’t investigating collusion

  6. #44506
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596



    but TSA seddddddd Mueller wasn’t investigating collusion
    I never once said Mueller wasn’t investigating collusion.
    I said Mueller hasn’t indicted a single person for collusion. That’s a fact.

  7. #44507
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    38,218
    I never once said Mueller wasn’t investigating collusion.
    I said Mueller hasn’t indicted a single person for collusion. That’s a fact.
    Holy that goddamn goalpost move

  8. #44508
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    38,218
    Mueller investigating collusion. That’s it and that’s all folks.

  9. #44509
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    Using the inauguration as a slush fund, coddling dictators, trying to transfer nuke tech to Saudi, letting lobbyists regulate the industries they represent, conducting domestic policy and foreign relations to benefit his own family and business cronies, paying a huge bribe to the political donor class as a tax cut, screwing farmers, alienating US allies...it ain't all about the loss in 2016. The losses have piled up since.
    "autistic screeching"

  10. #44510
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825

  11. #44511
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    Trump: "I could shoot a man in the middle of 5th Avenue, and my supporters would call anyone who complained an autistic screecher. Sounds great, right? Autistic screecher. It's the best buzzphrase."

  12. #44512
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    Holy that goddamn goalpost move
    No amount of smilies will hide how re ed your take was. Find a single post of me saying Mueller was not investigating collusion.

  13. #44513
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    38,218
    You said collusion theory dead multiple times and said Mueller wasn’t investigating it

  14. #44514
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    You said collusion theory dead multiple times and said Mueller wasn’t investigating it
    Again, find a single quote of me claiming Mueller was not investigating collusion, or run away like a pussy again.

  15. #44515
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    I never once said Mueller wasn’t investigating collusion.
    I said Mueller hasn’t indicted a single person for collusion. That’s a fact.
    You are very careful not to go out on any limb for predictions. Wonder why.

    What do you think is in all that redacted space in what we do know so far?

    Is it possible that he is saving the worst for last?

    Do racketeering trials generally paint pictures of individual misdeeds before the overall conspiracy charge?

    The answer to both, is, yes.

    Now what? No, not yet, and yes, we have a ways to go.

    Care to predict whether someone will be charged? (makes chicken noises)

  16. #44516
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Again, find a single quote of me claiming Mueller was not investigating collusion, or run away like a pussy again.
    You've had Pelosi, Feinstein, Schiff, Waters, Comey all say no collusion.
    TSA in 2017 "no collusion"

    TSA in 2019: No one has been indicted yet.

    Happy to give you that. You have never claimed Mueller wasn't investigating collusion.

    If you roll with the anons theory of Trump bringing Mueller on to go after the Clinton's the team Mueller assembled makes sense.
    You just were deluded by paranoia and stupidity as to whose collusion was being investigated. Or duped. Feel free to tell me which word is better, duped, or deluded.

  17. #44517
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    RandomGuy is it Mueller time yet?

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...odesta-n812776

    Mueller Now Investigating Democratic Lobbyist Tony Podesta
    Sure. Manafort indicted AND convicted, not Podesta. To beat you to it: Not for Russian collusion, just for lying about meetings and ties with Russians, because that is simply what people do.

  18. #44518
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    You are very careful not to go out on any limb for predictions. Wonder why.

    What do you think is in all that redacted space in what we do know so far?

    Is it possible that he is saving the worst for last?

    Do racketeering trials generally paint pictures of individual misdeeds before the overall conspiracy charge?

    The answer to both, is, yes.

    Now what? No, not yet, and yes, we have a ways to go.

    Care to predict whether someone will be charged? (makes chicken noises)
    I’ve nevered waivered on collusion from the get go. I predict no one from Trump campaign will be charged with colluding with Russia during the election.

  19. #44519
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    Sure. Manafort indicted AND convicted, not Podesta. To beat you to it: Not for Russian collusion, just for lying about meetings and ties with Russians, because that is simply what people do.

    None of what Manafort was indicted for had anything to do with election collusion. The things Manafort were actually indicted for are directly tied to Podesta so I fully expect Tony Podesta and Craig Greg to be indicted as well since they were involved in the scheme. You should be calling for their indictments as well.

  20. #44520
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Flynn’s testimony will be devastating in ways you haven’t imagined
    +++
    Godspeed

  21. #44521
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121

    1. Oh, man. If I’m looking at things right, this OIG report is going to stun the nation. This is going to be MASSIVE.

  22. #44522
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Rep. Peter T. King: Donald Trump Jr. interview casts doubt on any ‘collusion’

    Rep. Peter T. King said Sunday it’s difficult to conclude there was any collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign based on a recent interview Donald Trump Jr. gave to congressional investigators

    “Nobody listening to that interview could come out of that thinking there was any collusion at all. This is totally phony,” Mr. King, New York Republican, said on Fox News.

    Mr. King is a member of the House Intelligence Committee, which recently interviewed the younger Mr. Trump as part of its investigation into ties between Russia and the Trump campaign.

    Mr. King said the worst thing the president could do now would be to remove special counsel Robert Mueller, who is conducting a criminal investigation, saying such a move would give Democrats and the media an opportunity to “blow this up and come up with another phony issue.”

    He said once the collusion issue is set aside, investigators can turn to matters involving former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the president’s 2016 campaign opponent, such as a uranium deal involving Russia and the Clinton-led State Department during the Obama administration.

    http://amp.washingtontimes.com/news/...mpression=true
    "no collusion"

  23. #44523
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    You've had Pelosi, Feinstein, Schiff, Waters, Comey all say no collusion.
    "no collusion"

  24. #44524
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    I’ve nevered waivered on collusion from the get go. I predict no one from Trump campaign will be charged with colluding with Russia during the election.
    Again, find a single quote of me claiming Mueller was not investigating collusion, or run away like a pussy again.
    You've had Pelosi, Feinstein, Schiff, Waters, Comey all say no collusion.
    TSA in 2017 "no collusion"

    TSA in 2019: No one has been indicted yet.

    Happy to give you that. You have never claimed Mueller wasn't investigating collusion.

    If you roll with the anons theory of Trump bringing Mueller on to go after the Clinton's the team Mueller assembled makes sense.
    You just were deluded by paranoia and stupidity as to whose collusion was being investigated. Or duped. Feel free to tell me which word is better, duped, or deluded.

  25. #44525
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Sure. Manafort indicted AND convicted, not Podesta. To beat you to it: Not for Russian collusion, just for lying about meetings and ties with Russians, because that is simply what people do.
    None of what Manafort was indicted for had anything to do with election collusion. The things Manafort were actually indicted for are directly tied to Podesta so I fully expect Tony Podesta and Craig Greg to be indicted as well since they were involved in the scheme. You should be calling for their indictments as well.
    It's like you can't help yourself.

    Sure, if they did something wrong, they should be charged/indicted. Easy. For what? Don't say "things". 'n stuff.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •