"None of what Manafort was indicted for had anything to do with election collusion."
goddamn, you're fukkin stuped
Manafort Accused of Sharing Trump Polling Data With Russian Associate
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/08/u...-kilimnik.html
Yes collusion
It’s not “if” they did something wrong, Mueller already established that in Manafort’s indictment. They were intimately involved with Manafort in the scheme in Ukraine.It's like you can't help yourself.
Sure, if they did something wrong, they should be charged/indicted. Easy. For what? Don't say "things". 'n stuff.
Mueller didn’t charge him with any crime for that. This has gone on so long you Russiagaters don’t even remember your original conspiracy theory of Manafort and Page conspiring with Russia and Wikileaks to damage Hillary."None of what Manafort was indicted for had anything to do with election collusion."
goddamn, you're fukkin stuped
Manafort Accused of Sharing Trump Polling Data With Russian Associate
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/08/u...-kilimnik.html
Yes collusion
‘A Criminal Proceeding Is Not a Free for All’: Stone Judge Tells Corsi and Klayman to Take a Hike
These were Judge Amy Berman Jackson‘s words in a Thursday minute order
telling Corsi and Klayman that granting them leave to file an amicus brief
did not mean permission to “inform the Court of facts that he wished to bring to the Court’s attention on an ongoing basis.”
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile...o-take-a-hike/
‘A Criminal Proceeding Is Not a Free for All’: Stone Judge Tells Corsi and Klayman to Take a Hike
These were Judge Amy Berman Jackson‘s words in a Thursday minute order
telling Corsi and Klayman that granting them leave to file an amicus brief
did not mean permission to “inform the Court of facts that he wished to bring to the Court’s attention on an ongoing basis.”
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile...o-take-a-hike/
Sure, if they did something wrong, they should be charged/indicted. Easy. For what? Don't say "things". 'n stuff.
Translation:
"they did... things"
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000...f-7f735cc70000Translation:
"they did... things"
TSA is the horowitz FISA stuff gonna lay dormant until mueller is done?
legit wondering, cause i haven't heard anything about that report in a while. could it be they dont want to release that kind of info about an active investigation?
Do you follow emptywheel like winehole does? You’re going down the same path she is trying to keep your narrative afloat.
Yes and yes. Huber as well.
yeah... its just weird because in the FBI bias report, they talked about decision making of FBI with respect to prioritizing the russia investigation, etc
doesnt seem consistent
What will you guys have if those turn out to be nothingburgers?
Not following...what doesn’t seem consistent?
The same thing as your Russian collusion investigation.
Nah, we'd kick the can down to SDNY and state courts.
Where will you kick the can for Hillary and Obama?
Do what?
they were willing to talk about some aspects of the russia investigation in that previous report... so it wouldnt necessarily stand to reason that THIS is why they wont release the FISA one.
i dont think its a big deal or anything
'Memba det Huber status update hearing?
i actually dont. i've basically tuned out all the huber stuff because for a while they couldnt make up their minds about whether or not they wanted/needed a second special counsel'Memba det Huber status update hearing?
It was a lame duck session last year. No one from Huber's office showed up so the Republicans had some conspiracy theorists testify about Clinton Foundation financial statements.
just looked it up andthey actually brought in the judicial watch guy
just looked it up and
A guilty plea
There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 11 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
