![]()
That's exactly the question I asked you, dumbass.
I accept your white flag again.
You tell us why your boy was meeting with the terrorists, chump.
![]()
That's exactly the question I asked you, dumbass.
I accept your white flag again.
You don't have a good alibi: check.
You asked me exactly the same question I asked after failing to answer that question five times.
Why did you think that would work for you?
You realize that is waving your white flag.
Back up one claim in your life.
You think meeting with the terrorists was an upright act and not at all su ious: check
Psychopav
you still can't say what he did.
Now you're begging me to answer my own question.
That's some sad , derp.
Was he investigated by the FBI?
I don't know.
If you say he was, back up your claim.
Say when he was investigated and what for.
That's how this works.
Or wave your white flag again.
Your choice.
Should the FBI have investigated him?
For what?
His interactions with terrorists. Try to keep up.
Oh, so we're back to where you failed.
What were his interactions with terrorists?
Describe them in your own words.
He conferenced with them. Try to keep up.
Or do you think the FBI should've been disinterested in a high-profile American (let alone any American) interacting with terrorists?
"Conferenced"?
What does that even mean?
What was "conferenced"?
WTF do you think it means? Don't ask me stupid questions.
What was "conferenced"?
Your word.
Your claim.
Back it up.
It's a word that people use in speech all the time. Is this the W you're looking for, or are you just trying to steer away from your L?
I asked you straight up what they conferenced."
What did they "conference"?
That's a good question. For what reasons would you meet with terrorists?
I think you're lying about it tbh.
So, you haven't seen the pictures of McCain meeting with ISIS?
Psychopav Chump
You'll have to be more specific.
Who in ISIS?
If someone just said they're ISIS in some blog because they were Arab, that would be stupid.
Is that what happened?
This is not an obscure narrative. Do your own research if you're unfamiliar. This is why I said at the outset that you don't have the requisite understanding for this conversation.
If you don't even know the name of this guy, what's your point?
I'm just going to conclude it's bull .
I could give two s about the name of the guy (@ yet another desperate narrative though). McCain's meeting with ISIS is not in question.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)